- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Skip Bertman does not believe Jeremy Hill will be back
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:50 am to LSURussian
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:50 am to LSURussian
Then why did the other kid also get a misdemeanor? He wasn't a football hero
I know a lot of people that were at Redempotrist at the time and a lot of people that are friends with the other kid involved. It is pretty widely known that it was consensual
I know a lot of people that were at Redempotrist at the time and a lot of people that are friends with the other kid involved. It is pretty widely known that it was consensual
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:51 am to LSURussian
Sorry Hill punched your bro. 

Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:53 am to Cap Crunch
quote:
Then why did the other kid also get a misdemeanor? He wasn't a football hero

That would not have been too obvious, would it? Nah, that couldn't be it.....
quote:Under our law, a 14 year can't give consent. Other than that, you're right.
It is pretty widely known that it was consensual
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:53 am to Charter n Coke
quote:Ya' got me. That was my beloved 'bro.'
Sorry Hill punched your bro
And I'm sorry Hill got your 14 year old sister to give him a bj.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:54 am to LSURussian
quote:
That would not have been too obvious, would it? Nah, that couldn't be it.....
Do you really think we would let TWO kids off of a rape charge because one of them was potentially going to be a good player for LSU?
quote:
Under our law, a 14 year can't give consent. Other than that, you're right.
Which is why he got arrested, because in legal terms, he was in the wrong
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:56 am to Cap Crunch
quote:It doesn't matter what I think. That is what happened.
Do you really think we would let TWO kids off of a rape charge because one of them was potentially going to be a good player for LSU?
quote:Not just a 'wrong' but a felony.
Which is why he got arrested, because in legal terms, he was in the wrong
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:57 am to LSURussian
quote:
It doesn't matter what I think. That is what happened.

quote:
Not just a 'wrong' but a felony
Whatever helps you sleep at night
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:10 pm to LSURussian
quote:
And I'm sorry Hill got your 14 year old sister to give him a bj.

You just sound like you're completely butthurt over this whole ordeal. Catching a blowjob as a Senior in high school from someone 3 years younger than you is not that creepy. Not to mention black girls usually mature earlier (11-13), and if she wanted to suck his dick, Im sure it wasn't a very tough decision. As far as punching a dude, maybe he shouldn't have done it, but its not like he hit him multiple times or kicked him in the head while he was on the ground. He deserves a couple game suspension, but ruin his pro prospects and possibly his entire future?... I think not
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:12 pm to Charter n Coke
quote:
Not to mention black girls usually mature earlier (11-13)
1. This is dumb
2. She was white

Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:14 pm to Charter n Coke
quote:
from someone 3 years younger
quote:
black girls
You're 0 for 2.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:17 pm to LSURussian
LSURussian, you're either posting drunk or posting stupid. Neither is a very good idea.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:23 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Under our law, a 14 year can't give consent. Other than that, you're right.
Well that's just fricking wrong
quote:
Misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile is committed when a person who is seventeen years of age or older has sexual intercourse, with consent, with a person who is thirteen years of age or older but less than seventeen years of age, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender, and when the difference between the age of the victim and age of the offender is greater than two years, but less than four years.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:26 pm to EarthwormJim
This thread is winning and is awesome.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:31 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
Misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile is committed when a person who is seventeen years of age or older has sexual intercourse, with consent, with a person who is thirteen years of age or older but less than seventeen years of age, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender, and when the difference between the age of the victim and age of the offender is greater than two years, but less than four years
Not a felon!

Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:32 pm to EarthwormJim
I noticed you didn't post a link.
I will post links.
LINK
I will post links.
quote:
What is the 2013 Age of Consent in Louisiana?
The Louisiana legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 17 years old. nine states have a legal age of consent of 17.
LINK
quote:LINK
RS 14:80 Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile -- States that the consenting age for sexual relations is 17.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:35 pm to LSURussian
quote:
I noticed you didn't post a link.
LINK DUMBASS
quote:
Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile
Why are you linking felony carnal knowledge? It was a misdemeanor.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:35 pm to nycajun
You guys have no clue what you're talking about.
I'll leave it at that.
The more I hear about this case, its seems more plausible that what Skip says has a lot of validity.
I'll leave it at that.
The more I hear about this case, its seems more plausible that what Skip says has a lot of validity.
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:37 pm to EarthwormJim
Maybe there's a legal "Consent" definition and an ambiguous "consent" definition. 

Back to top
