- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SEC’s threat to penalize.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:20 am
Is the penalty based on if the player plays in a game or if they are out on the 105 roster (deadline today)?
5
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am to LSUTIGAHS123
They’ll change the goal post either way
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am to LSUTIGAHS123
On roster. It's not enforceable in my (unqualified) legal opinion
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:38 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:23 am to MasterAbe1
quote:
They’ll change the goal post either way
This is the answer.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:27 am to LSUTIGAHS123
Nonsense. OIe Miss has an ineligible QB on their roster and the SEC said that's just fine. So we're good. 
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:05 pm to LSUTIGAHS123
It is interesting. Brings up another question for the board legal scholars.
The SEC suit specifically states that Lane actively “RECRUITED” nfl players. Does not mention as far as I am aware anything about “SIGNING” them.
So how can the SEC go after Lane and LSU for recruiting these players yet ignore what seems to be established fact that other SEC schools “RECRUITED” nfl players too?
Seems like all it would take is one single agent or player to testify under oath that another SEC school recruited them to destroy the SECs argument.
Even better would be document like email, text or offer sheet from any other SEC school showing said recruitment.
The SEC suit specifically states that Lane actively “RECRUITED” nfl players. Does not mention as far as I am aware anything about “SIGNING” them.
So how can the SEC go after Lane and LSU for recruiting these players yet ignore what seems to be established fact that other SEC schools “RECRUITED” nfl players too?
Seems like all it would take is one single agent or player to testify under oath that another SEC school recruited them to destroy the SECs argument.
Even better would be document like email, text or offer sheet from any other SEC school showing said recruitment.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:12 pm to LSUTIGAHS123
quote:Hopefully its based on the players being on the roster. Given his court mandate, Jorden will slap the SEC/Stankey with contempt faster than you can say "ouch!"
Is the penalty based on if the player plays in a game or if they are out on the 105 roster
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News