- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:18 pm to jacquespene8
quote:I think it was a penalty, but your post above is just wrong. The stripe of our blocker's helmet is to the left of the leftmost 4 of the SC player.
Our blocker’s helmet is in between the 4 and 4 of #44. Looks like #44 is smack dab inside the framework
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:25 pm to Chicken
Distance between punter and blockers is too damn close. We may soon see punts hit the back of blockers. We block our own punt.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:30 pm to jacquespene8
quote:
Our blocker’s helmet is in between the 4 and 4 of #44. Looks like #44 is smack dab inside the framework
I mean, as nitpicky as I can be, the helmet stripe (could be the photograph angle, mind you), of our blocker is shaded ever so slightly to that left (blocker's perspective) of the 2 4s, but on the other hand, his head is tilted a little to the left, too.
It is arguable that he is closer to being perfectly centered than "outside the framework". Damning for whomever at the SEC made/confirmed that call.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:41 pm to SUB
Fine.
I will not protest the win.
I will not protest the win.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:47 pm to paulb52
quote:
Distance between punter and blockers is too damn close. We may soon see punts hit the back of blockers. We block our own punt.
Special teams play has not been good under Kelly.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:55 pm to DBG
I’m just giving you a reason that it might not have been an interception. If you don’t believe that Julio was touching the ball while out of bounds that’s fine too. You asked me to give you a reason so I did.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:58 pm to SUB
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/20/24 at 10:53 am
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:03 pm to MOT
quote:
He’s going to play the Julio touched it while out of bounds card, which isn’t the reason it was ruled incomplete to begin with but was conveniently noticed after the fact.
Yeah I can’t remember them giving a clear explanation on why, I’m just giving you a reason as to why it might actually be incomplete according to the rulebook.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:04 pm to 33inNC
quote:
Really? Why don't you quote the rule book and what rule it was "close" to? It was an NFL interception, he got 2 feet in.
I wanna hear it.
Do you think it’s legal for a player to be touching the ball while he is standing out of bounds?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:13 pm to SUB
"He leaped outside the framework...."
Into the framework...
Into the framework...
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:40 pm to LSBoosie
That is funny, not one person has provided evidence that this is even remotely true. Hell, if that was possible, why didn't the SEC themselves state that this was the reason?
Hint: they didn't because they couldn't.
Hint: they didn't because they couldn't.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:49 pm to tigersbh
Damn you sure made boosie look like a idiot lol 
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:52 pm to LSBoosie
But that’s not valid. The ref didn’t cite that either.
It was and still is a completely illogical decision.
It was and still is a completely illogical decision.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:59 pm to tigersbh
Clearly pp7 had levitation abilities and never touched the ground
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:32 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Do you think it’s legal for a player to be touching the ball while he is standing out of bounds?
This is an oddly phrased question.
Players touch the ball while out of bounds all the time. Very rarely is it “illegal.”
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:36 pm to Purple N Gold Blood
quote:
Damn you sure made boosie look like a idiot lol
How did he do that?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:38 pm to DrEdgeLSU
quote:
Players touch the ball while out of bounds all the time. Very rarely is it “illegal.”
You are telling me players touch loose balls while they are out of bounds and they let they play go on? And you are telling me that it happens all the time?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:39 pm to DBG
quote:
But that’s not valid. The ref didn’t cite that either.
It was and still is a completely illogical decision.
What’s not valid? Are you mad that they got the call wrong or that they didn’t cite why exactly they made the call?
Popular
Back to top



2



