Started By
Message

re: Regarding Jay’s late inning decisions

Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:36 am to
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14933 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:36 am to
I didn’t like the Morgan bunt based on all the factors you listed and it’s just not something we do. In a vacuum it would be fine.

I liked the steal play, merrifield is just too slow for it, and Kling maybe should have broke for second instead of diving back.
Posted by LSUstephen17
Houston
Member since Aug 2010
13112 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:39 am to
He made great moves with pitching last night and that’s what won the game. This is ALL that matters
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11187 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:47 am to
quote:

This is a play we ran in high school and I have to assume it’s a similar call here. The runner on first takes a a slightly larger lead than usual to induce a pick off. The “play” is, if the pitcher throws to first, the runner on 3rd breaks for home




Maybe the runner on 1st messed it up by not breaking for 2nd? That makes it a tougher play on the 1b and if he tries to throw out the runner at home ,he’s throwing across his body and even if he makes a great throw, still allows the runner on 1st to reach scoring position. Makes more sense that way.
This post was edited on 6/22/23 at 6:50 am
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
17112 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:49 am to
Bunting Tre was stupid. Hot hitters should hit. Not bunt.
And how many times has bunting worked out for us in CWS?



Posted by MarineVet
Member since Aug 2018
916 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 7:38 am to
I think when you face a good team and you have the momentum along with a 3 run lead, you let the game come to you. That failed bunt bailed the pitcher out who was definitely feeling pressure.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12013 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 7:42 am to
quote:

1st and 3rd play- Honestly, no issue. You have Pearson up against that same lefty, really difficult AB. Tried to swipe 1 insurance run. Probably could have been executed better by Merrifield, but decision wise I thought it was fine.



You’re up 3. It was a fine call. WF wasn’t coming back.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20032 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 8:34 am to
quote:

No, it isn't. Statistics say this is false.


What statistics? What assumptions are we using in your scenario?

In game decisions are not made in a vacuum. Relying strictly on historical outcomes ignores the fact that decisions are a function of risk and reward, and that you are in the same position as the the statistics you are relying upon were derived. I mean I think “statistics” can basically be thrown out the window just based on the anecdotal observation that we are a below average bunting team.

Statistics suggest that nobody would ever win money at a casino. Not only do people still gamble, some actually win.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58130 posts
Posted on 6/22/23 at 9:06 am to
quote:

2 on, no out, bunting with Tre Morgan- In a vacuum, it’s a good call.


No way would I have taken the bat out of Morgan’s hands in that situation
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram