Started By
Message

questions for anti O's negatards? LSU Coach Fedora?

Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:05 am
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:05 am
do you think we would have finished with a better record and had a better recruiting class with coach Fedora (for way more money, PROB 5 MIL/YR) if we would have taken him instead of hiring coach O. He and Fleck seemed next up on our board as far as realistic candidates that may have actually taken the job. Fleck was probably to young and much of a stretch at that time.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 9:07 am
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:06 am to
frick you are stupid
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29126 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:07 am to
what is this gibberish
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33793 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:07 am to
These type of questions serve no purpose. If I were to say yes, all you would basically say is "NUH UHHHH!"

All we know is we have Orgeron and he's a career loser.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

uck you are stupid



not as stupid as you!
Posted by shaqtaw
Member since Oct 2009
4969 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:08 am to
You don’t think O was a stretch?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:08 am to
Fedora would've been a really bad hire. Just like Orgeron was.
quote:


He and Fleck seemed next up on our board as far as realistic candidates that may have actually taken the job.


Where is your evidence of this?

It was apparently just Herman then Orgeron according to reports.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 9:09 am
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

questions for anti O's negatards?


Is this list in the binder or do you fricking clowns all get together and make them up?

Because they're stupid.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:10 am to
quote:

not as stupid as you!


Way more actually.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20355 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:10 am to
It's not just about last season, think long term man.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:12 am to
quote:

You don’t think O was a stretch?


all that we were left with were stretchs. He was already here and already had a tryout for the job, so we knew what his floor was and a little about what we were getting.

I would have liked the Fleck hire also but he probably would have had more of a learning curve than o and the fans would have had to be more patient ( d our fans being patient) with Fleck.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Where is your evidence of this?


He has none...he's talking completely out of his arse.

quote:

It was apparently just Herman then Orgeron according to reports.


Correct.

Despite having what amounted to over a year to create a list and vet every potential football coach in America, we had two guys on the white board and the third was our very own DL coach and his 10-25 career coaching record.

Underneath him, there were notes like "Buy more paper for the copier" and "Who's buying lunch???"
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Way more actually.


way way less actually.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:15 am to
quote:

way way less actually.


Your post history proves that to be false many times over.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:15 am to
quote:

all that we were left with were stretchs


You keep believing that fairy tale. After a year of knowing we'd be needing a coach and everything we have to offer, apparently Ed Orgeron bailed our asses out! Because there were NO OTHER OPTIONS AT ALL after the two top candidates.

None.

Anywhere.

In THE WHOLE COUNTRY!

Right...
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:19 am to
quote:

t was apparently just Herman then Orgeron according to reports.

wheres your evidence of this?

After Herman and Fisher all the talk centered on unrealistic choices such as Kelly and Chris Peterson, then they had the 2nd tier like Fedora and Fleck .


Neither of us know who was really under serious consideration but these are the names that at the time on this board were being talked about as candidates
Posted by 00 Tech Grad
My homestead, AL
Member since Nov 2009
10694 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:21 am to
Teams that made a better football HC hire than LSU since LSU hired Orgeron = every NCAA team that hired a football HC since LSU hired Orgeron.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 9:22 am
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:21 am to
quote:

our post history proves that to be false many times over.


that's your opinion which proves my point.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37242 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:22 am to
quote:

all that we were left with were stretchs.


Let's call them risks. And not all risks are the same.

quote:

He was already here and already had a tryout for the job


So we're back to the idea that the problem was solely Les Miles...therefore, O should have had immediate success this season right?

quote:

so we knew what his floor was and a little about what we were getting.


So his floor is only his interim stint and NOT his Ole Miss stint. Is that correct?

quote:

I would have liked the Fleck hire also but he probably would have had more of a learning curve than o and the fans would have had to be more patient ( d our fans being patient) with Fleck.




I still don't understand how you guys look at things so broadly. Hiring Fleck would have been saying "LSU is trending downwards as a program , we need a new staff, a new vision, a new foundation for the program." So, by default, he does get more time to reshape LSU into his image, and I guarantee everyone would give him time to do that. At least 3 years.

Hiring O was saying, as you clearly said above "he was already here," "Les Miles is a problem, we are a fringe championship team, and Les is holding us back. If we remove Les, and allow someone who doesn't meddle to come in and recruit well, we can compete immediately." The thought was O's 6-2 interim stint was proof that Les was a problem, and that O could be successful right now and this wasn't a rebuild.

Hiring Fleck, Fedora, Fuente, Kelly, and hiring O are different things.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 9:23 am
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21677 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 9:24 am to
So many things wrong with your post. Oh my oh my.

quote:

do you think we would have finished with a better record and had a better recruiting class with coach Fedora


Considering that Fedora is a better coach, Yes. He wouldn't have lost to Troy. Would he have a higher ranked class than O? Yes, because O's class is 15th and I would say it wouldn't be too impossible for Fedora to have a top 14th ranked class.

quote:

(for way more money, PROB 5 MIL/YR)


Wait is this a pro O thread? Wow, this nullifies your point. You don't cheap out. You pay for successful coaches. What does this say about O?

quote:

Fleck was probably to young and much of a stretch at that time.




Was more successful at his previous destination and as a position coach in the NFL than your boy O. frick youth. If he's good, then you wouldn't have to conduct a coaching search for 10-15 years at the minimum. Orgeron will be 57 soon.


Good try though Boxcar Ponamsky.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram