- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:06 pm to lsutigertalk
quote:
I think this isn't real
That's what I thought at first, then I downloaded it and that is a very professional spreadsheet. Must be true.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:07 pm to munchman
quote:
I thought the SEC conf. rules state that everyone has to play everyone else in there side of the conf.....
It's a NCAA rule so unless Miss State is put in a different division we are playing them.
From the NCAA Rulebook:
quote:
17.9.5.2 Annual Exemptions. [FBS/FCS] The maximum number of football contests shall exclude the following:
(Revised: 10/28/10)
(C) Twelve-Member Conference Championship Game. [FBS/FCS] A conference championship game
between division champions of a member conference of 12 or more institutions that is divided into two
divisions (of six or more institutions each), each of which conducts round-robin, regular-season competition
among the members of that division;
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:08 pm to Chd1478
The permanent games will continue as long as Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, and Auburn are all in opposite divisions.
They'd have to go to a 9-game schedule. A lot of the other 12-team conferences are doing it.
They'd have to go to a 9-game schedule. A lot of the other 12-team conferences are doing it.
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:08 pm to Ace Midnight
Why not play A&M instead of Towson? Still can't believe they scheduled Towson! Who the frick are they! Unless they were they ONLY team that had an open date, that is just plain ridiculous.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:09 pm to silstang23
Anyone know who Christian Lundy is? He's listed as the author of that file.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:09 pm to lsutigertalk
quote:
No way we lose MSU from the schedule and keep 2 games from the East.
Agreed. Makes no sense.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:09 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:
17.9.5.2 Annual Exemptions. [FBS/FCS] The maximum number of football contests shall exclude the following:
(Revised: 10/28/10)
(C) Twelve-Member Conference Championship Game. [FBS/FCS] A conference championship game
between division champions of a member conference of 12 or more institutions that is divided into two
divisions (of six or more institutions each), each of which conducts round-robin, regular-season competition
among the members of that division;
the mac has 13 teams, play an unbalanced schedule, and have a champ game.
its called a waiver brah
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:10 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
sec office really does hate lsu
quote:
frick you slive
STFU.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:11 pm to silstang23
quote:and have more conference games than everyone else?
Why not play A&M instead of Towson? Still can't believe they scheduled Towson! Who the frick are they! Unless they were they ONLY team that had an open date, that is just plain ridiculous.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:12 pm to Chd1478
quote:
LSU and FLorida athletic departments both lobbying for permanent removal of the annual rivalry game.
And I don't blame either organization. I don't mind playing every team in the division - that's part of the deal. I don't mind rotating all the cross-division rivals, as long as everybody else does - that's fair. But to hang us with Florida for 20 freakin' years (and lately, they may feel the same way about us) - seems blatantly unfair when others in the West get to play Vandy or Kentucky every year (and E teams get to play Ole Miss or Miss State every year).
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:12 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
its called a waiver brah
Why would the SEC schedule games so they have to ask for something there is a possibility that wouldn't be granted?
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:13 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:
Why would the SEC schedule games so they have to ask for something there is a possibility that wouldn't be granted?
why wouldnt it be granted? if the mac can get one for having 13 what grounds would the ncaa have in not granting the same to the sec.
makes no sense
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:14 pm to bee Rye
That schedule is some serious bullshite if genuine.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:14 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:why don't you know what provisional means?
Why would the SEC schedule games so they have to ask for something there is a possibility that wouldn't be granted?
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:17 pm to jcole4lsu
Doubt many Big 12 schools are a big fan of the SEC right now, nor the Big East or ACC which could be raided for SEC team #14.
Its not a given they'd get waiver (probable but not absolute given)and why would the SEC put itself in a subservient position unless it really had no other choice, which it does.
I see a 14th Team by 2012 or legislation to modify the rule before the SEC puts itself in a position of asking for anything from other schools.
Its not a given they'd get waiver (probable but not absolute given)and why would the SEC put itself in a subservient position unless it really had no other choice, which it does.
I see a 14th Team by 2012 or legislation to modify the rule before the SEC puts itself in a position of asking for anything from other schools.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:18 pm to bee Rye
They will most likely add a 14th team soon, but if not I would be a big supporter of moving Auburn to the east division and kicking Vandy out of the SEC...problem solved.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:19 pm to bee Rye
quote:
why don't you know what provisional means?
If you open the file and look at it, it is clearly a fabrication of what one person, who has no say in the scheduling, thinks would happen if we stay at 13 teams. Anyone buying in to it even being provisional has been duped.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:19 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:
Doubt many Big 12 schools are a big fan of the SEC right now, nor the Big East or ACC which could be raided for SEC team #14.
what does any of this have to do with the ncaa granting a waiver?
hell the head of the ncaa was head of lsu when i was there, hes not going to screw the sec over.
besides, it did say "provisional" you know
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:19 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:I don't think the Big 12, Big East or ACC would have a say so in the NCAA granting a waiver or not
Doubt many Big 12 schools are a big fan of the SEC right now, nor the Big East or ACC which could be raided for SEC team #14.
Its not a given they'd get waiver (probable but not absolute given)and why would the SEC put itself in a subservient position unless it really had no other choice, which it does.
I see a 14th Team by 2012 or legislation to modify the rule before the SEC puts itself in a position of asking for anything from other schools.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News