- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pretty sure this now cements LSU will NOT start #1 in AP.........
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:28 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:28 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Are you upset that someone disagreed with you...on a message board?
Good Lord...
Good Lord...
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:30 pm to Macintosh
quote:
If we are Top 10 I will be SHOCKED
We don' gon' full-rantard.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:30 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
We don' gon' full-rantard.
That's genuine genuining...
Did I do that right? lol
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:34 pm to Tiger Voodoo
They might fall to #3 if that...they probably would have been behind USC even w/o this.
Coaches voted before Silas Redd transferred to USC and the difference between the top 3 was so small.
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if LSU was #1.
Media isn't taking this news as anything that damaging.
Example, CFN regarding the dismissal:
Nothing stops. LSU should still win the national title.
Coaches voted before Silas Redd transferred to USC and the difference between the top 3 was so small.
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if LSU was #1.
Media isn't taking this news as anything that damaging.
Example, CFN regarding the dismissal:
Nothing stops. LSU should still win the national title.
This post was edited on 8/10/12 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:35 pm to RummelTiger
Not upset at all.
But if you actually don't think a single member of the media will move us down a spot or two after losing a Heisman finalist leaving us with an even younger and more inexperienced secondary, it makes me roll my eyes. I already posted that Hebstreit has already said he's moving them down in his rankings. Hence the
But no, not upset at all. Hence the

But if you actually don't think a single member of the media will move us down a spot or two after losing a Heisman finalist leaving us with an even younger and more inexperienced secondary, it makes me roll my eyes. I already posted that Hebstreit has already said he's moving them down in his rankings. Hence the

But no, not upset at all. Hence the


This post was edited on 8/10/12 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:36 pm to slutiger5
quote:
11 players on the field at once buddy.
yes, you are correct, but the rankings are probably based on 22 players.
so, i think the hit is 1/22 not 1/11.
and, we are already hearing great things about the freshmen backup.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 3:42 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
But if you actually don't think a single member of the media will move us down a spot or two
The media is full of idiots, so I guess you could be right.
quote:
losing a Heisman finalist leaving us with an even younger and more inexperienced secondary, it makes me roll my eyes
That makes me roll my eyes. Chavis has already said that this will be the best secondary that we've had, so I don't think losing one of the worst cover guys will hurt all that much.
quote:
I already posted that Hebstreit has already said he's moving them down in his rankings.
Well, there you go, idiot #1.
quote:
But no, not upset at all.
That's nice.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 4:17 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Rankings don't mean shite until the start of bowl season, and only if you are #1 or #2.
This - it's preseason, who cares about standings when a down of football has yet to be played.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 4:32 pm to S157947
rankings matter twice - when 1 and 2 are selected for the BCS Championship Game AND following the BCS Championship Game.
I cannot imagine that we are not AP preseason Top 5, but I couldn't care less.
Best of luck to #7 - get your head straight young man
Geaux Tigers
I cannot imagine that we are not AP preseason Top 5, but I couldn't care less.
Best of luck to #7 - get your head straight young man
Geaux Tigers
Posted on 8/10/12 at 6:08 pm to Tiger Voodoo
AP was always going to rank FUSC #1 regardless. We'll be #2.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 6:18 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Rankings don't mean shite until the start of bowl season, and only if you are #1 or #2.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 6:21 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Does anyone here actually want to begin the season ranked #1? All it does is add unneeded pressure. If we win out, we're in the BCSNCG...so why not start out somewhere comfortable like 3?
Posted on 8/10/12 at 6:30 pm to LSU Beach Lover
99% of TD posters didn't think he was a distraction 2 days ago or a few weeks back when I said Tyrann wouldn't make it through the season.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 7:03 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Maybe we should just forfeit the season! Or better yet, cancel the football program all together? We lost our starting QB last year before the season, and when he did return, placed much more pressure on Chavis' defense than losing TM. This is a PROGRAM! Come on brother, our schedule compared to last, cake....

Posted on 8/10/12 at 7:05 pm to LSU Beach Lover
quote:
Grow up.... there are a lot more players than Mathieu... he was good but obviously a distraction....
Lol
Yes, such a huge distraction.
Posted on 8/10/12 at 7:09 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Good. Let SC have that giant target on their back for the first half of the season.
if LSU wins the SEC it wont matter
if LSU wins the SEC it wont matter
This post was edited on 8/10/12 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 8/10/12 at 7:27 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Rankings don't mean shite until the start of bowl season, and only if you are #1 or #2.
pretty sure AP rankings don't mean shite, ever?
This post was edited on 8/10/12 at 7:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
