Started By
Message

re: Pretty funny by Guilbeau

Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:14 pm to
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41313 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

He nailed this one.


No
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23086 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

2 quarterback system? You mean Jefferson playing 90% and Lee getting mop up when the game is out of reach?
you mean that one time that happened last night vs WKU?

Rantard Law 1306.1(a): Any good thing (or something you like) that happens several times is a fluke; conversely a bad thing (or something you just don't like) happens once and it is guaranteed to happen every single time for the foreseeable future.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81948 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

No
Point out what's wrong.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41313 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Rantard Law 1306.1(a): Any good thing (or something you like) that happens several times is a fluke; conversely a bad thing (or something you just don't like) happens once and it is guaranteed to happen every single time for the foreseeable future.




Posted by TIGRLEE
Northeast Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:18 pm to
GEEEEEEEEEEEEES,,,


Alright outside riding the mike the tiger cage paragraph (which was funny and a legit opinion shared by many LSU fans) which part of that whole story is pathetic and a slap to the face to LM and or our football program?

I must have missed it.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41313 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Point out what's wrong.


It is trying to create a controversy where there isn't one. Not surprising that the Leetards who only support one qb would support this shite rag of an article.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263218 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Do you think miles cares more about JJ getting playing time than he does about winning a national championship?



I don't think anyone disputes that Miles thinks he can work solely with JJ and win the NC. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that a coach or coaching staff has a bias. Are you saying that there can't be a bias?
There is a reason why most people who follow LSU think there is a chance there is a bias.
If LSU wins the NC it will not matter anyway.

This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 5:22 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81948 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

It is trying to create a controversy where there isn't one. Not surprising that the Leetards who only support one qb would support this shite rag of an article.
So like, point out what's wrong.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:22 pm to
The entire paragraph is shite spew that all but says in plain English, "I think Miles favors JJ just because he does, even though there is no merit to it."

The implication of that is pretty insulting IMO.
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85063 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:22 pm to
You might be right, or maybe not. I guess we'll see. But it seems to me that since JJ returned, there has been a conversion to him as starter taking place, increasing each game, culminating last night.

Many think Lee, after his last 2 passes against Bama, needed an opportunity to get back on track. Instead, he was benched, for at least a game. Do you think we're going to see equal playing time going forth, or revert to last year, with JJ starting and Lee spot duty bailing him out?
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

I've actually written to the Town Talk before over GG. He's horrible. He nailed this one.


Some posters can't understand how they can be so wrong.

They have to justify their error by assuming that the head coach has an undeniable love affair with a player.

They have to justify their error by assuming that the head coach and staff would rather play one player and thereby jeopardize everything that the coaches, staff, and the rest of the team has worked for.

Even though the head coach and staff has worked with the rest of the team everyday, even though the head coach and staff have witnessed the rest of the team's hard work and sacrifice, even though the head coach and staff have grown personal relationships with every member of the rest of the team.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23086 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that there can't be a bias?
to the extent that it's being supposed on this board? Hell no.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81948 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

The implication of that is pretty insulting IMO.
It is, but the case has been made.
Posted by TIGRLEE
Northeast Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Not surprising that the Leetards who only support one qb would support this shite rag of an article.


and then here you come.

Im not sure if I know anyone IRL that disagrees with that article.

Which exact part of it makes you so irritated?
Serioulsy... quote it so I can read it and hopefully understand why you're so angry.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263218 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

to the extent that it's being supposed on this board? Hell no.




You must be seeing things that I am not. What things are you talking about?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98691 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
Sounds like a sarcastic dig at the anti JJ Rantards to me.
Posted by Dirty Pierre
West Chimes St
Member since Sep 2011
745 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
Are you kidding? What an stupid comment by Guilbeau.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

There is a reason why most people who follow LSU think there is a chance there is a bias.


This implies that most people who follow LSU are stupid, therefore I disagree.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263218 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 5:26 pm to
quote:



This implies that most people who follow LSU are stupid, therefore I disagree.




I don't believe you understand the definition of bias.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram