Started By
Message

re: Prefer Skenes to Open the Super or Potentially Close it Out??

Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
73796 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

In Supers you have win 2 games against the same team. LSU would obviously be trying to win both games. In fact someone NOT NAMED SKENES will need to beat Kentucky to go to CWS.


Skenes gives us the highest probability to win any particular game. Winning game one gives us the highest probability to win the series.

Skenes also has the highest probability of getting deeper into the game, which means fewer bullpen decisions. Reducing the number of decisions reduces the number of chances to be wrong. It also preserves the bullpen for later in the series.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22817 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

There is no rationalizing starting anyone but Skenes


I can make the rationalization that if you win game 1 with Floyd then that could demoralize UK since they know their chances have just been greatly reduced on wining game 2.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
19120 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Skenes starts game 1, without question.

Agreed. But the constant overthinking from the fanbase will happen because of a 2pm start time, and worried about a 3:30 rain delay essentially burning Skenes.

I still start Skenes because rain is not guaranteed to happen, so you don't overthink it. Just have Hurd mentally ready to go extensive innings if the weather forces you to pull Skenes early.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
5560 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

In the Supers, you play to win every single game.
Is that to say by starting Floyd in Game 1 that they wouldn't playing to win?

And no, I'm not suggesting they do that.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22817 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Skenes also has the highest probability of getting deeper into the game, which means fewer bullpen decisions. Reducing the number of decisions reduces the number of chances to be wrong. It also preserves the bullpen for later in the series.


I could make the argument that throwing Skenes 2nd gives your 1in bullpen guys additional rest bc Skenes won’t need the help.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33392 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Is that to say by starting Floyd in Game 1 that they wouldn't playing to win?

No, it’s to say that Skenes gives you the best chance to win. You take the best chance, every time.

Playing cute and trying to ensure a game 2 victory is a fantastic way to lose game one and burn half the bullpen while doing it.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
5880 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:03 pm to
No brainer. You go with your Ace in Game#1. Close it out? If you lose first game you have to win the next two. Winning first game is a must.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33392 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I can make the rationalization that if you win game 1 with Floyd then that could demoralize UK since they know their chances have just been greatly reduced on wining game 2.

Guess what is more likely: LSU winning a Skenes start or LSU winning a Ty Floyd start?

Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
76605 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:04 pm to
The only way we don't start Skenes game 1 is if we know ahead of time that rain will threaten all day.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33392 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:04 pm to
Agreed about the weather.
Posted by PenguinPubes
Frozen Tundra
Member since Jan 2018
11461 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Prefer Skenes to Open the Super or Potentially Close it Out?? b


Is our fanbase really this stupid or are these trolls?
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
18010 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Ok so what is the difference if he pitches 1st game or second?


Because needing to win game 2 AND 3 is different than needing to win game 2 OR 3

This isn’t even debatable, you pitch your ace in game 1.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22817 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Playing cute and trying to ensure a game 2 victory is a fantastic way to lose game one and burn half the bullpen while doing it.


How is this playing cute? You need 2 wins. I would almost be more interested in who Kentucky pitches 1st. Skenes v Uk’s ace and Floyd vs Uk’s #2 is ideal bc our stud is better than their stud and I feel confident that our #2 is better than their #2. Skenes v UK’s #2 in game one and Floyd v Uk’s ace is NOT ideal.
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 12:07 pm
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
73796 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

I could make the argument that throwing Skenes 2nd gives your 1in bullpen guys additional rest bc Skenes won’t need the help.


Then make a fricking argument. You haven't actually made one in this thread yet.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
5560 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

No, it’s to say that Skenes gives you the best chance to win. You take the best chance, every time.
I think I understand what you're saying, it's just your wording is funky.

What you are trying to say is you go with highest win probability each game as you go along. So Skenes Gm 1, Floyd Gm2 and so on.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33392 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:07 pm to
I can only repeat the same information to you so many times.

There’s a reason everyone in the thread is telling you the same thing. Winning game one is the goal in game one. Paul Skenes gives us the best chance to win game one. Ty Floyd is a good pitcher and our second best arm, but he does not give us a a better chance to win game one than Paul Skenes.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22817 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Then make a fricking argument. You haven't actually made one in this thread yet.


Let’s say Floyd requires 3 bullpen guys to go 1in each and Skenes would only require 1 bullpen guy to go one inning.

If Floyd goes 1st then 2 of the pen guys could get an additional days rest to be used for game 3. If Skenes goes 1st then more guys will have pitched the day before.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22817 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

There’s a reason everyone in the thread is telling you the same thing. Winning game one is the goal in game one. Paul Skenes gives us the best chance to win game one. Ty Floyd is a good pitcher and our second best arm, but he does not give us a a better chance to win game one than Paul Skenes.


How good is Kentucky #1 and #2? Is their #1 significantly better than their #2? This info matters.

We all know our ace is better than everyone else in the country’s ace so whoever UK throws out there LSU will be favored with Skenes on the mound. The question is “IF” one of UK’s pitchers is better than Floyd. If so if I am UK then I WANT that pitcher to pitch againt Floyd vs Skenes.

If I am UK I like my chances A LOT more IF I can get this to a 3rd game. If I am LSU, I want this series to end in 2 so I want to make sure the matchups are in my favor.
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 12:17 pm
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22625 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:24 pm to
After what we just saw in the regionals with Jays management of the pitching staff I would say let Jay handle it. He obviously knows more than we do and takes everything including weather into making his decisions
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
16918 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

How would Floyd be conceding a game?


I was speaking about UKs coach. Reread post.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram