0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Omar says "not to my knowledge "
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:22 pm to JackDempsey
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:22 pm to JackDempsey
But did she ask her brother....."What's in the box?"
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:23 pm to JackDempsey
Honorary degree from University of Tennessee incoming...
Elsewhere on the web...
Elsewhere on the web...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
you are being called an idiot by every other poster in this thread.
By a guy who posted this:
quote:
BBONDS25
quote:
Based upon her response to a very simple question I would say she did.
And that was after you edited your initial response to clean up your stupidity
This post was edited on 10/22/26 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:24 pm to ronricks
quote:
that the person she was married to is not related to her in any way, shape, or form
Now, don't go changing words since your entire history in this thread is based upon the words of the interviewer and Omar.
She said, "Not to my knowledge." She did not say 'any way, shape or form.'"
Plausible deniability at it's finest.
One could easily extrapolate that this choice of words by Omar will lead to a defense of, " I had no idea we were related."
Very odd choice of words, don't ya think?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:24 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:26 pm to ronricks
quote:
That is a whole separate topic. Me understanding:
A. The question
B. Her answer
is a distinctly different thing from whether I believe her or not. Two totally separate and different things. Hope this helps you understand it better.
So you're saying you understand why her answer was deliberately deceiving?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:29 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
So you're saying you understand why her answer was deliberately deceiving?
You seem to be having a hard time understand this. Her answer does not just pertain to her brother. You understand that don't you? Once you answer and understand that part we then can discuss what my opinion on this is. Your rejoinder.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:29 pm to JackDempsey
quote:
When asked in an interview if the guy she used to be married to was related to her.
There is no possible way that's a question you can answer with "not to my knowledge."
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:33 pm to ronricks
quote:
Her answer covers siblings, uncle, cousin, etc. it isn't just her brother. Her answer is that the person she was married to is not related to her in any way, shape, or form. You do understand that. Right?
talk about misrepresenting facts!! she absolutely did not say this. this is your interpretation
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:35 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
There is no possible way that's a question you can answer with "not to my knowledge."
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:39 pm to minister of truth
quote:
talk about misrepresenting facts!! she absolutely did not say this
People think she was married to her brother at one point. Right? So, her answer implies that to her knowledge she was not married to anyone that she was related to. Do you understand this? This isn't just about her brother her answer would cover cousins for example. Why do you think she answered that way? Think about it.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:40 pm to ronricks
quote:
Why do you think she answered that way?
To cover her arse. No other reason at all.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:42 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
To cover her arse.
Go on..... extrapolate on this. Walk us through what your opinion is.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:43 pm to imjustafatkid
"Is your real name Nur Said Elmi?"
"Not to my knowledge."
"Not to my knowledge."
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:51 pm to ronricks
so you think. "not to my knowledge " is equivalent to
"Her answer is that the person she was married to is not related to her in any way, shape, or form"?
Is you believe those statements have the same meaning, then I can see why you thought Kumala was going to beat Trump. You hear what you want to hear.
"Her answer is that the person she was married to is not related to her in any way, shape, or form"?
Is you believe those statements have the same meaning, then I can see why you thought Kumala was going to beat Trump. You hear what you want to hear.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:55 pm to ronricks
In the clip, the interviewer is referencing her marriage and asked if she was related to him.
Omar answers, "Not to my knowledge."
Now, why would she answer in this fashion? That answer does not tell us she is not related to him. It tells that if she is related to him, she claims to not have known. This is telling.
Do you not understand this choice of words here? Obviously not, or you choose to play dumb, which I lean towards because your post history does not come across as someone that is stupid.
She is deliberately answering this way so that she can claim she never knew she was related to him if it is later proved she is. Her defense will be "oopsie, sorry about that. I did not know."
Omar answers, "Not to my knowledge."
Now, why would she answer in this fashion? That answer does not tell us she is not related to him. It tells that if she is related to him, she claims to not have known. This is telling.
Do you not understand this choice of words here? Obviously not, or you choose to play dumb, which I lean towards because your post history does not come across as someone that is stupid.
She is deliberately answering this way so that she can claim she never knew she was related to him if it is later proved she is. Her defense will be "oopsie, sorry about that. I did not know."
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:56 pm to JackDempsey
I've come to the conclusion that politicians are not people.
Kind of like strippers.
Some less than others but its a souless profession.
Kind of like strippers.
Some less than others but its a souless profession.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 3:13 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Now, why would she answer in this fashion? That answer does not tell us she is not related to him. It tells that if she is related to him, she claims to not have known. This is telling.
This doesn't just pertain to her brother. At one point in time inbreeding was common in Somali social structure. Somalis can marry their cousins because the practice is permissible under Islamic law for one.
quote:
Do you not understand this choice of words here?
Yes I do. It has been rumored the Feds got DNA from her household via the garbage. Her answer was to her knowledge she was not married to a family member (not just her brother)
quote:
She is deliberately answering this way so that she can claim she never knew she was related to him if it is later proved she is.
She answered this way because due to inbreeding in Somalia if it comes back that the person she was married to even share 1% of DNA she can say she didn't know. You are too focused on the borther. So lets say it is found out that the person she was married to they share 2% of the same family DNA everyone on here will say "see she married a family member!!" when her answer left her an out not for her brother but for the chance she was married to some very distant cousin from many generations ago.
quote:
Her defense will be "oopsie, sorry about that. I did not know."
That isn't a valid defense to any sane person from being married to your brother
Some of you aren't thinking this though.
This is just my opinion. I am not saying I know one way or the other unlike other posters on here.
Conclusion: her answer of "not to my knowledge" doesn't protect her from being married to her brother but it certainly would from a very distant relative. Do you understand the logic here? Tell me.
This post was edited on 10/22/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 10/22/26 at 3:21 pm to ronricks
quote:
And that was after you edited your initial response to clean up your stupidity This post was edited on 10/22/26 at 1:40 pm
Within one minute of my original post, you moron. I fixed a spelling error. I did not change the substance of the post. You are such a dumb idiot. You accuse me of having to change my post to “hide stupidity.” It was within seconds.
quote:
Posted by BBONDS25 on 10/22/26 at 1:40 pm to ronricks
None of that is relevant to the utter stupidity of your initial post trying to correct the OP, because you thought the OP mentioned her brother. You dumb frick.
And laughing at me not believing Omar further proves your idiocy. Anything than an emphatic “no” to the question she was asked implies guilt. Everyone here, except you, grasps that very simple point. You’re melting over an attempt to defend Omar. You’re clearly DSA. It’s strange you’re so ashamed of that.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 3:26 pm to ronricks
quote:
Go on..... extrapolate on this. Walk us through what your opinion is.
Holy shite! I don’t know why your stupidity still surprises me. You put it on full display constantly. Go to Google and type in “plausible deniability” and learn the obvious fact every single poster in her except you already knows.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News