- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official QB Thread...(do not start a new thread to discuss QB's)
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:32 pm to MichiganTiger
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:32 pm to MichiganTiger
quote:
I have to think that he did so well against GT b/c 1) expectations were low and he played with nothing to lose...he simply wasn't tight b/c of this 2) he had a crap load of time to prepare for a single game/game plan.
People always point to this game as JJ's coming out party and fail to recognize he went 5/13 in the second, less than 39% completion rate, and the O put up a whopping 3 points the second half----sound familiar? Yeah, he had a good first half, but GT couldn't have been more compliant with turnovers and overall crappy performance, they simply weren't into that game and thought they deserved a better bowl game.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:32 pm to just me
My comments have always been simple on the issue, and that is the coaches are in practice with these guys every single day. They see every rep, every throw, and have the most exposure to the QBs on a daily basis - much more than we the fans. In college, you have to believe that the coaches are putting the QB in the game which gives our team the best chance to win. Unlike the NFL where a coach gets tied to a QB due to large contracts, in college coaches contracts and their very own job security is based on WINS - so don\\\'t you think Miles wants to win and wants to keep his job and therefore will absolutely put the best performing player at practice in the game?
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:43 pm to truck man
quote:Look at the completion percentage of Lee's last five starts or the last five games in which he played; take your pick. He completed over 50% in only one game. The trend is a downward sloping line. That's regression.
you also must bring realize that Jefferson is regressing
Jefferson made five mistakes against UNC, but he also completed over 71%.
quote:Lee 2008 = RS Fr = True Sophomore = Jefferson 2009.
which should almost be expected from a REAL YOUNG QB. (i say real cause a RS is young)
quote:He's played two games of his junior year.
nor will he ever get it done
quote:Again, what in the world makes you think that Lee can throw it better than Jefferson?
at least let the guy who can throw do it
The game performance almost solely favors Jefferson.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:51 pm to grif82
quote:I honestly don't know if he has improved. Did he improve from 2008 to 2009? No, he didn't. The coaches are still playing Jefferson. So, although one might be inclined to think that he improved, it is speculation.
Do you honest think that there's no way he couldn't of made any improvements since 08' and LaTech of 09'????
quote:Yes, I do. He made 5 mistakes in the UNC game. He played a horrible Vandy game. However, those were the first and second games of the year. They were on the road.
and do you honestly see any improvement in JJ since the GT game????
I have seen Jefferson play much better. I have no reason to believe that the Vandy game is how Jefferson will play the rest of the year. It was, after all, his worst game ever.
quote:That's not really the question. The real question is whether Jefferson will give us a better chance to win than Lee. I haven't seen them practice. I don't know who is better. The coaches want to start Jefferson. I hope Lee will get some snaps too. I hope they both play well.
do you honestly think that we could run the ball effectively against much better SEC defenses with Jefferson at QB
However, it is nothing but absolutely pure speculation to think that Lee is better than Jefferson.
Moreover, all of the known facts suggest that Jefferson is better than Lee.
This post was edited on 9/14/10 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 9/14/10 at 1:57 pm to Sammobile
quote:
quote:
Very few posters have stated that Lee should start. You will see the vast majority of the posters stating that they would like to see him play.
what?
you must have avatars turned off
So what if they do? Right or wrong, probably better than 3/4 of LSU fans want Lee after the Vandy game.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:02 pm to just me
Not going to read the entire 17 pages and not answering just me specifically. Just want to chime in.
What pissed me off most about Saturday night is that CLM could have used the 4th quarter to actually let Lee show whether or not he could have a better game than JJ. He chose to hang with JJ, who was OBVIOUSLY not up to snuff until the last two series. I think at some point,CLM will have to show that JJ is MUCH better than Lee, I personally would have played JL the entire second half. JJ was terrible, for whatever reason.
What pissed me off most about Saturday night is that CLM could have used the 4th quarter to actually let Lee show whether or not he could have a better game than JJ. He chose to hang with JJ, who was OBVIOUSLY not up to snuff until the last two series. I think at some point,CLM will have to show that JJ is MUCH better than Lee, I personally would have played JL the entire second half. JJ was terrible, for whatever reason.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:03 pm to msutiger
The way I see it is Les wants to be stubborn and stick with his guy, so I say keep waiting on him to have his awakening and prove you right or for your termination to occur and let's see which one happens first. I know which one I'd put my money on. Hope I am wrong.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:07 pm to tigadog
I can see it already:
Fans boo JJ when he takes the field. To shut them up, Miles sends JL out on the field. 1st snap, JL throws a pick-6.
Fans cheer JJ's return to the field.
Miles sports a coy little smirk. LSU goes on to win.
/point made
/end QB controversy
Fans boo JJ when he takes the field. To shut them up, Miles sends JL out on the field. 1st snap, JL throws a pick-6.
Fans cheer JJ's return to the field.
Miles sports a coy little smirk. LSU goes on to win.
/point made
/end QB controversy
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:13 pm to just me
quote:
but he also completed over 71%
You like to lean on JJs completion percentage.
Have you considered the fact with a high completion percentage, JJ did not move the offense against UNC?
Because of his poor accuracy (doesn't hit receiver's in stride)and his poor choices of who to throw to (almost always underneath on 3rd down to receivers with no chance to make 1st down).
How is JJ going to improve his production? He already has a high completion percentage, and did last year as he lead one of the most inept offenses in LSU history.
He lacks all of the intangibles that cannot be taught to a QB.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:23 pm to Housplants
One point to consider, probably considered already is this massive thread, is that we have three big-time playmakers who are essentially useless as receivers right now.
We have to find a way to get the ball to RR, TT and RS via the pass and we need to be able to stretch the field.
Saban will blitz us to death if we can only rely on the run and short passes to move the ball. To loosen up a great defense, we must be able to stretch the field.
Lee, although not great, does give us that ability. I think if Lee can get over his turnover issue, he could function in a similar fashion to John Parker Wilson at Bama two years ago...only Lee has a better arm. Remember, Bama went undefeated in the regular season that year with a great defense, strong running game and manager of a QB who could stretch the field two or three times per game.
We don't need Elway, but we do need someone who can loosen the defense up and allow us to utilize the amazing talent we have as wideouts. There is an whole dimension to this team, perhaps the best dimension, that is almost completely unexplored because we cannot pass down the field.
We have to find a way to get the ball to RR, TT and RS via the pass and we need to be able to stretch the field.
Saban will blitz us to death if we can only rely on the run and short passes to move the ball. To loosen up a great defense, we must be able to stretch the field.
Lee, although not great, does give us that ability. I think if Lee can get over his turnover issue, he could function in a similar fashion to John Parker Wilson at Bama two years ago...only Lee has a better arm. Remember, Bama went undefeated in the regular season that year with a great defense, strong running game and manager of a QB who could stretch the field two or three times per game.
We don't need Elway, but we do need someone who can loosen the defense up and allow us to utilize the amazing talent we have as wideouts. There is an whole dimension to this team, perhaps the best dimension, that is almost completely unexplored because we cannot pass down the field.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:24 pm to just me
quote:
I honestly don't know if he has improved. Did he improve from 2008 to 2009? No, he didn't. The coaches are still playing Jefferson. So, although one might be inclined to think that he improved, it is speculation.
True, most of the assumptions regarding Lee are based on pure speculation.
quote:
Yes, I do. He made 5 mistakes in the UNC game. He played a horrible Vandy game. However, those were the first and second games of the year. They were on the road.
I have seen Jefferson play much better. I have no reason to believe that the Vandy game is how Jefferson will play the rest of the year. It was, after all, his worst game ever.
I have to somewhat disagree with you on this. Jefferson hasn't shown any significant improvement last year or this year. Evidence that Miles has to dumb down an already vanilla playbook after 18 starts supports this.
quote:
That's not really the question. The real question is whether Jefferson will give us a better chance to win than Lee. I haven't seen them practice. I don't know who is better. The coaches want to start Jefferson. I hope Lee will get some snaps too. I hope they both play well.
I like to look at this as to whether which QB has more upside. IMO, JJ has hit his ceiling as evidence to his 09' season and so far this season. JL's ceiling is so far an unknown. If he's got a hold on the decision making aspect of the QB position then we may be a NC contender this year or next year. What we do know is that JL's mechanics are far superior to JJ's. It's just the "between the ears" aspect that's holding him back.
Also, as far as the coaches, I won't go there. I think Miles' insistence on running the option speaks for itself in characterizing him as stubborn and unwilling to make decisive changes before it's to late.
quote:
However, it is nothing but absolutely pure speculation to think that Lee is better than Jefferson.
Moreover, all of the known facts suggest that Jefferson is better than Lee.
The word "known" it key. It's what we don't know. That's the fuel for the controversy.
Wouldn't you agree to allow Lee to get meaningful snaps to "know" and to put all this speculation to rest?
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:26 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
One point to consider, probably considered already is this massive thread, is that we have three big-time playmakers who are essentially useless as receivers right now.
We have to find a way to get the ball to RR, TT and RS via the pass and we need to be able to stretch the field.
Saban will blitz us to death if we can only rely on the run and short passes to move the ball. To loosen up a great defense, we must be able to stretch the field.
Lee, although not great, does give us that ability. I think if Lee can get over his turnover issue, he could function in a similar fashion to John Parker Wilson at Bama two years ago...only Lee has a better arm. Remember, Bama went undefeated in the regular season that year with a great defense, strong running game and manager of a QB who could stretch the field two or three times per game.
We don't need Elway, but we do need someone who can loosen the defense up and allow us to utilize the amazing talent we have as wideouts. There is an whole dimension to this team, perhaps the best dimension, that is almost completely unexplored because we cannot pass down the field.
Great post!


Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:27 pm to Housplants
quote:Well, let's start with the facts. He did move the offense against UNC. Unfortunately, he made five mistakes. However, we also lost four fumbles and suffered some very inopportune penalties. Those fumbles and penalties killed more drives than Jefferson did. Indeed, on the plays where Jefferson threw underneath on 3rd down, we were facing 3rd and long because of penalties. In other words, it was a low percentage play to convert third down anyway.
Have you considered the fact with a high completion percentage, JJ did not move the offense against UNC?
quote:The majority of last year's ineptness does not fall on Jefferson's shoulders. In addition, he was only a very young sophomore. He's learning.
last year as he lead one of the most inept offenses in LSU history
quote:Does he? I don't know about that. It's not the issue anyway. The issue is whether Jefferson gives LSU a better chance to win than Lee.
He lacks all of the intangibles that cannot be taught to a QB.
Right now, the coaches think Jefferson gives us the better chance to win. The known facts also suggest that Jefferson gives LSU the better chance to win. I hope Jefferson plays much better against Mississippi State. I hope Lee gets to play at least one possession against Mississippi State, and when he does, I hope he also plays much better than the way he played in the past.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:29 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
The roar when he goes into a game, at this point with what is going on, will far outweigh and totally erase the boos.
Death Valley will go ape shite when JL jogs onto the field this time.

Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:32 pm to just me
quote:
The majority of last year's ineptness does not fall on Jefferson's shoulders
Then who does it fall on???
quote:
In addition, he was only a very young sophomore. He's learning.
There a TRUE FRESHMAN that start at Div I schools. They put up good numbers and can hit receivers in stride (and by numbers, I mean MORE than just completion percentage, like not taking sacks totaling almost -300 yards).
He is a JUNIOR this year....So far he looks no better(UNC game) and worse (Vandy game) than last year. That does not inspire confidence in his ability to "progress" this season.
Considering the young and learning thing, why not extend that same courtesy to Lee?
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:42 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Considering the young and learning thing, why not extend that same courtesy to Lee?
I guess the occasional interception to the end zone is far worse than multiple stagnant drives two yards prior to the first down marker (see that's where JJ's high percentage passes are going to go).
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:50 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
I can see it already:
Fans boo JJ when he takes the field. To shut them up, Miles sends JL out on the field. 1st snap, JL throws a pick-6.
Fans cheer JJ's return to the field.
Miles sports a coy little smirk. LSU goes on to win.
/point made
/end QB controversy
Nah, I can see us having less than 100 total yards by halftime with us up 6-0 thanks to our defense giving us good field position. Then Les, being stubborn as usual, sends JJ back out only to be greeted with a rain of "boos". JJ then goes 3 and out the next two series finally forcing Mile's hand. JL then comes out and moves the ball through the air and gives us our first TD of the game with a 15 yard slant route to Randle. After that Ridly and Shep gives us a pair of TDs on the ground for a 27-0 win.
For the next 36 hours after the win and solid 2nd half performance by Lee we all (except for the few JJ sunshine pumpers left)agree that he should be given the starting job for the time being. Miles, at his Monday luncheon, announces that he's still wants to stick with JJ and gives a bunch of half-coherent reasons as to why. As a result, the Rant is even worse than it is now.

Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:54 pm to grif82
quote:
Miles, at his Monday luncheon, announces that he's still wants to stick with JJ and gives a bunch of half-coherent reasons as to why. As a result, the Rant is even worse than it is now.
Maybe Miles is **trying** to destroy the rant....maybe he has that particular "want"
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:58 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:Yeah, if only Randle and Shepard could get balls thrown to them so that they could score touchdowns.
One point to consider, probably considered already is this massive thread, is that we have three big-time playmakers who are essentially useless as receivers right now.
Like maybe a 50+ yard pass to Randle. I bet that would be nice. Maybe some short passes to Shepard in space where he can use his skill to score touchdowns. Oh, that could never happen with Jefferson at QB.
I guess we can only dream.
Oh . . . no . . . wait . . .
R. Randle 4 71 17.8 1 51
R. Shepard 2 12 6.0 1 6
quote:Please, show me the game statistics that demonstrate that Lee has more long pass completions than Jefferson. I'll wait.
To loosen up a great defense, we must be able to stretch the field.
Lee, although not great, does give us that ability.
quote:You didn't watch the first half of the UNC game, did you.
There is an whole dimension to this team, perhaps the best dimension, that is almost completely unexplored because we cannot pass down the field.
Posted on 9/14/10 at 2:59 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Maybe Miles is **trying** to destroy the rant....maybe he has that particular "want"
It would be the crowning moment of his coaching career at LSU.
LES: The Man that Silenced Tiger Nation!
Coming to a theater near you
Popular
Back to top
