- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Offensive Scheme - LSU or USC
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:20 pm
I like USC's better. I don't like the QB running. If the QB is running, that means, Williams, Tolliver, Lafell, Scott are not running.
So, I prefer USC's scheme. But I still hate USC. Give them credit though for the 3-pete, no i mean 2-pete, no that's right the 1-pete.
So, I prefer USC's scheme. But I still hate USC. Give them credit though for the 3-pete, no i mean 2-pete, no that's right the 1-pete.
4
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:21 pm to specs1
bad time to compare the 2......duck!
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:21 pm to specs1
so, what's the point of having a mobile qb, if you aren't going to have them run, yeah, USC's offense is better, what's they score, 18 points the other night
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:28 pm to josh336
quote:
so, what's the point of having a mobile qb, if you aren't going to have them run, yeah, USC's offense is better, what's they score, 18 points the other night
USC win was MUCH better.
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:29 pm to josh336
SC can afford an immobile QB mainly because no one in their conference can rush the passer. Their OL is huge and might be as good as the asskissing media says. When it was time to beat OSU, they just punched the Bucks in the mouth and ran down their throats.
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:29 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
USC win was MUCH better.
No doubt. On the road in front of 106k red clad fans. Barkley stepped up. Mcknight looks awesome.
Not a fan of USC by any means, but the next three years are going to be good to Petey.
Posted on 9/13/09 at 10:56 pm to specs1
USC won, so hats off for that.
But, did you watch the game? OSU controlled the game except for the final drive.
USC first scoring drive...3 yards on 4 plays.
Stats..
313 total yards with 87 yards on the last poss.
Barkley 15/31 for 195 yds.
Mcknight 16 carries for 60 yards.
Barkley will eventually be incredible, just not this year. OSU is good, but not as good as the media thinks.
Bottom line..
USC O-line is better than ours and thus their Scheme will look better this year than ours. I think we have more talent in the WR/RB positions as a unit than USC. But without a solid O-line it is hard to showcase it.
But, did you watch the game? OSU controlled the game except for the final drive.
USC first scoring drive...3 yards on 4 plays.
Stats..
313 total yards with 87 yards on the last poss.
Barkley 15/31 for 195 yds.
Mcknight 16 carries for 60 yards.
Barkley will eventually be incredible, just not this year. OSU is good, but not as good as the media thinks.
Bottom line..
USC O-line is better than ours and thus their Scheme will look better this year than ours. I think we have more talent in the WR/RB positions as a unit than USC. But without a solid O-line it is hard to showcase it.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:25 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
USC O-line is better than ours and thus their Scheme will look better this year than ours. I think we have more talent in the WR/RB positions as a unit than USC. But without a solid O-line it is hard to showcase it.
That's a valid point. I've just never been a fan of the running qb. I did not like it when Flynn would run either. I prefer the offense we played w/ Jamarcus.
Granted, Les does not call me for advice.
This post was edited on 9/14/09 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:42 pm to specs1
SC is not really very complicated. they run the shite out of inside and outside zone (I hate 'em but God it looks good when they run it). they play action with specific coverage beater concepts off of those two runs, and they isolate their athletes in space on mismatches.
Obviously there is a little more to their offense than that but what I mentioned above is probably about 75% of what they'll do this year, especially with a young QB.
The Tigers do a good job of getting it to their players in space as well. I really like the way they get Dickson chasing space in the short game. He's very good at it. Lafell has taken over Doucet's role in the option route package.
I can't say I prefer one over another. They both are tailored to personnel and fit well with what each coordinator has.
Obviously there is a little more to their offense than that but what I mentioned above is probably about 75% of what they'll do this year, especially with a young QB.
The Tigers do a good job of getting it to their players in space as well. I really like the way they get Dickson chasing space in the short game. He's very good at it. Lafell has taken over Doucet's role in the option route package.
I can't say I prefer one over another. They both are tailored to personnel and fit well with what each coordinator has.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:47 pm to pilsnerpusher
OSU the team that struggled against navy, good?
Washington may upset USC.
Washington may upset USC.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:49 pm to gotygers
quote:
Washington may upset USC.
That would be great, but I doubt it. USC is far more complete than Washington.
Although, I would not be surprised to see Washington win 8 games and go to a decent bowl. And yes was very impressed w/ Locker.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:50 pm to gotygers
quote:
Washington may upset USC.
tenn may upset Fla
see where Im going with this?
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:50 pm to gotygers
quote:
OSU the team that struggled against navy, good?
Washington may upset USC.
washington, the team that lost to LSU?
USC may hang a hundred.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:50 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
USC win was MUCH better.
Not really...both teams 2-0 with a long way to go. usc will get beat...so will we, it just depends on when and to who.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:51 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
it just depends on when and to who.
shouldn't that be "to whom"?
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:53 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
Not really...both teams 2-0
Okay. A win on the road in front of 105K agsainst a top 10 team is not really better than a win at home against a perennial dormat of the SEC.
It means more points in puter polls.
This post was edited on 9/14/09 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:53 pm to specs1
quote:
Granted, Les does not call me for advice.
Well, Les does get advice from me, and I told him we clearly needed to see more of Scott up the middle.
This post was edited on 9/14/09 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:55 pm to DocBugbear
compare them after this weeks usc-washington game.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:56 pm to gotygers
quote:
Washington may upset USC.
USC will beat Wash comfortably.
Posted on 9/14/09 at 8:57 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
Not really
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News