- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Offensive Line vs Scheme. NE vs KC - perfect explanation why LSU's scheme needs to change
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:34 am to SammyTiger
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:34 am to SammyTiger
quote:
The fact that they couldn’t pick up blitzes that we’re ahwon pre snap in games like the Florida Game was an issue.
It scheme is also an issue
This is correct. LSU was trying to block very good edge rushers with a running back. A mismatch from hell. Its because LSU wasn't athletic enough on the edge. This is why it's critical to get better play at the tackle position. How anyone could argue against this is bewildering to me but posters have literally argued against putting better more athletic players at the tackle position.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:39 am to bencoleman
Not just edge rusher.
We couldn’t pick up blitzes.
Against Florida Joseph are you lunch and he’s a LB.
No one is going to argue that OL play was good.
But it wasn’t our only issue on offense.
Players weren’t the only issue on offense.
We couldn’t pick up blitzes.
Against Florida Joseph are you lunch and he’s a LB.
No one is going to argue that OL play was good.
But it wasn’t our only issue on offense.
Players weren’t the only issue on offense.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:43 am to SammyTiger
The fact that they couldn’t pick up blitzes that we’re ahwon pre snap in games like the Florida Game was an issue.
It scheme is also an issue
This is correct.
I agreed with you sammy.
Please don't argue just to argue.
It scheme is also an issue
This is correct.
I agreed with you sammy.
Please don't argue just to argue.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:47 am to bencoleman
So what are we doing to improve from an Xs and Os standpoint? Because I dont See us beating teams consistently without a clear talent advantage.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:50 am to SammyTiger
quote:
So what are we doing to improve from an Xs and Os standpoint? Because I dont See us beating teams consistently without a clear talent advantage
I don't know but scrap some of the current pass blocking schemes. It's really just the one that is so bad. It's also the one LSU likes to use the most.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:51 am to bencoleman
I’d like to see a lot more RPOs and take pass blocking out of the equation more.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 9:55 am to SammyTiger
quote:
I’d like to see a lot more RPOs and take pass blocking out of the equation more
I don't know. Get more athletic at tackle and get healthy at tight end and we may see an entirely new offense. In fact that may be the plan. Some kind of hybrid offense. I'd be all for that.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:19 am to TrevRollings29
quote:
Patrick Mahomes' average Time to Throw is 2.91 seconds. Tom Brady's is 2.61 seconds. Only a few teams in the NFL are over 3 seconds.
What you are stating here, without apparently know it, is that experienced quarterbacks recognize where to throw the ball earlier than inexperienced quarterbacks.
I'm fairly confident the issue is not that Tom Brady has a terrible offensive line - he just reads the defense and takes what is available. Quickly.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:22 am to ChEgrad
Tom Brady gets the ballnout very fast.
He also makes over 80% of his passes within 10 yards.
LSU runs asks burrow to throw 10+ yards and wait for those routes to develope far too often.
He also makes over 80% of his passes within 10 yards.
LSU runs asks burrow to throw 10+ yards and wait for those routes to develope far too often.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:23 am to bencoleman
quote:going to throw this out there as it pertains to talent vs. scheme...
I don't know but scrap some of the current pass blocking schemes. It's really just the one that is so bad. It's also the one LSU likes to use the most.
What if our talent on the OL functioned as well as it did ONLY because that zone scheme(s) masked some, not all... but some, of the deficiencies.
The assumption is that zone blocking schemes are the source of the problem, but then I see many (and I'm not singling you out bencoleman) in the same breath say we don't have the talent on the OL. I don't see how one can argue that both are true.
And for the record, I do think we lack talent in certain places. And that our blocking scheme has helped in certain areas. In the same breath my argument while missing some talent is complemented by zone schemes, our overall scheme is not complementing those two (mainly formations).
I'm going to point out something I saw both the NFC and AFC champions do last night... 2 TE sets, either with motion man or FB... pass play with at least 4 in routes. It is possible to line up in power or protect, and run a pass play, including spreading the field along both axis... from a run/protect formation. It can be done. Don't make yourself hostage to the formation. There's my biggest pet peeve regarding a complementary overall scheme. Works very well with zone schemes because the initial keys for the back 7 look exactly, well... not exactly but very similar, whether that is a run out of power or a pass with protect, or a pass with 3-5 in routes.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:30 am to bencoleman
LSU Pass Pro: Max Protect Blocking Schemes/Sacks/Reduced Off Production
The Foster Moreau Problem
TE scores in less time than LSU takes to throw
RB scores in less time than LSU takes to throw
A - Max Protect does not work and takes RB & TE out of OFF
B - The faster the ball is thrown or run past the LOS the quicker it is a problem for the Defense
quote:
I wrote last month about the Foster Moreau problem and how he was never really able to flex on people like he could have because the staff thought they needed him more as a pass protector than receiver.
LSU has also kept the running back in for protection often. This has led to some of our best athletes not getting the ball in space.
You have to go back to 2006 to find a running back with over 30 catches
The Foster Moreau Problem

TE scores in less time than LSU takes to throw

RB scores in less time than LSU takes to throw
A - Max Protect does not work and takes RB & TE out of OFF
B - The faster the ball is thrown or run past the LOS the quicker it is a problem for the Defense
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:32 am to SEC Grapevine
Ensminger does not comprehend this.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:37 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
IMO it's a little tough to be comparing two of the best NFL offenses to what LSU is doing. Obviously, we need to improve in a number of areas on offense, but players are in the NFL for a reason.
I agree. Also, the 20 hr rule is a big difference.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:38 am to jgriffith

Lawrence's quick release and speedy WR 6'5" tee Higgins effectively take everyone else out of this play, if you accept the tactical concept and don't choose to get tangled up in the weeds.


Rams looking a lot like Clemson.
This post was edited on 1/21/19 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:51 am to TrevRollings29
quote:
Patrick Mahomes' average Time to Throw is 2.91 seconds. Tom Brady's is 2.61 seconds. Only a few teams in the NFL are over 3 seconds.
Friendly reminder, and obvious point - all of the offensive lines in the NFL are, well NFL offensive lines.
So, whether it's LA Tech or Alabama (who will always have NFL or near NFL caliber defensive line) - LSU's offensive scheme needs to update itself.
Also, can someone find me a team in the NFL that doesn't use motions and jet sweeps or swing passes these days?
Thanks.
When any team has multiple players that dominate the line of scrimmage, it's very hard to execute any scheme.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 10:54 am to cj2002
quote:
I agree. Also, the 20 hr rule is a big difference.
If that were the problem, rather than an "LSU excuse", how do you explain spread High School, & College Offenses which the NFL copies?
I think the NFLPA limits practice to essentially the same as college.
Banging you head against a wall for more hours a day does not make you more efficient at being obsolete.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 11:02 am to SEC Grapevine

This 31 yr old guy has plenty of time for this.
He turned the Rams around in 1 year running the same 5 people out of the same personnel formation.
He did not add complexity. He simplified and sped the plays up.
Making a 5 yr plan is great job security.....and a great excuse for status quo
LINK
This post was edited on 1/21/19 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 1/21/19 at 2:00 pm to I20goon
quote:
The assumption is that zone blocking schemes are the source of the problem, but then I see many (and I'm not singling you out bencoleman) in the same breath say we don't have the talent on the OL. I don't see how one can argue that both are true.
I see a problem with certain zone blocking schemes. I don't know why the coaches are locked into certain ones but they must feel that they're hands are tied. The reason that I told sammy that I was hoping for a hybrid is that I didn't want to completely abandon what they're doing.
LSU has to get better at tackle. Asking a running back to take on elite edge rushers isn't working.
People like to bitch about the play action but plenty of teams use this to great effect.
If LSU can make the heavy set work be it run or pass I'm all for it.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 2:22 pm to SammyTiger
After watching the blocking scheme against the Florida play posted on here, I didn't like the way brossette went across the formation to block and then didn't have anyone to block anyway. Should have been used to pick up the lb up the middle who eventually gets the TFL. In most of the plays illustrated, the tackles were easily whipped or blew assignments, this is the most critical position to upgrade on the team along with upgrading the blocking schemes and route combos.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 2:35 pm to I20goon
I've said this many times on here, you need to run/pass out of "heavy sets" and do the same out of "spread sets" and do it on similar down and distances to stay unpredictable. It wouldn't be the "fix all" but it would take some pressure off the line when you have the defense guessing and not just selling out because they know it's what you have always run in that formation/personnel and down and distance. Very rarely have you seen SE on 2nd and short line up in heavy/run set and throw it, I find this troubling.
Popular
Back to top
