Of all the frames, this one seems most telling...(yet some still defending the call!!!??)

Defenseless player...check.

Contact to the head or neck area.....check.

Yes, targeting.

quote:

---

Defenseless player

---

The qb should have protected himself instead of throwing the ball. Sounds like it was his own fault.

Now that you admit it is targeting, you can work on changing the NCAA defenseless player definition.

Progress is being made.

uhhhhhhhh, maybe you should read Note 1.


The bullet points are just indicators, a few of them. The rule is clearly defined. And White clearly broke it.

Don’t see it... only see hands to the chest —not head or neck area and momentum carries it through. I’d like to see all frames in one post

quote:

---

The rule is clearly defined. And White clearly broke it.

---

Then 90% of tackles in football are “targeting”.

Watch the video, look at the picture, connect the dots of what happened in between.

Or is that too much thinking for that tiny brain?

quote:

---

So if a Bama player pushes Joe B anywhere on the chest or higher it is targeting right?

---

God damn yall are like teen age girls.

If Joe B throws a pass and is defenseless. That is point 1.

If the Bama player utilizes forcible contact, which can be defined as contact in excess of what a normal tackle would require (Paraphrasing, but that is basically it.) that is point 2

If the Bama player comes in high, and comes close to the head or neck area....point 3. Yes he should be called for targeting.

quote:

---

Then 90% of tackles in football are “targeting”.

---

and now every QB is defenseless after throwing a pass. Sad state of football.