- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Objective Oregon Analysis
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:04 am to litangel
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:04 am to litangel
quote:
ADVANTAGE OREGON
1. Darren Thomas -
That is your only advantage and I agree that is a big advantage. As far as depth, you talk out of both sides of your mouth. You say Oregon doesn't pull top 10 classes like LSU, then say you have better depth. Depth advantage is LSU by a good bit. Coaching is better on a week to week basis for Oregon imo. You cannot ignore the fact that in four big games when teams had time to prepare you are 0-4 under Kelly. Two losses to Boise State, a loss to Ohio State, and Auburn in the NC. On the other hand, if it wasn't for the worst field conditions seen since the 20's in a bowl game, Les would be undefeated at LSU outside the SEC. As it is, he still has a ridiculous record of something like 26-1. Les is the best coach in the nation with time to prepare. I'm not sure how anyone could even argue this when you look at his record.
0
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:22 am to keeerrrttt1
quote:
He misspelled Darron Thomas...if a fellow Duck fan can't spell a player's name right, I stop reading at that point. Credibility lost.
It's not like Darron is tough either
have you ever seen ppl on this board try to spell Mauck?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:24 am to ATLTiger
You did make some good points kudos to that, but the last score you threw out there C'mon man that aint gonna happen. 
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:37 am to litangel
quote:Game's at night, but it will still be hot ~90°F perhaps 95°F. The pace will be interesting ETA: If the a/c is out .
but Oregon's pacing (even faster than 2010)
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 7:46 am
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:41 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
quote:
but Oregon's pacing (even faster than 2010)
Game's at night, but it will still be hot ~90°F perhaps 95°F. The pace will be interesting.
Dallas has a roof dude. It will be 78* on the field.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:43 am to Wedge
quote:
Dallas has a roof dude. It will be 78* on the field
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:44 am to litangel
quote:
I think LSU has the depth on the D-Line, but I wonder how your backup Secondary and Linebackers will do?
our secondary depth is just flat out nasty. LBs not so much, but since I doubt we'll use more than 2 LBs that much, we should be ok. getting guys subbed in is what worries me somewhat.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 7:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
ETA: If the a/c is out .
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:16 am to Wedge
LSU LB's will be as good as the DL is at occupying blockers. I'm confident of Brockers, Freak, etc. Our LB's will be fast to the outside with an open lane.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:20 am to litangel
Id vs Ego. Id is who you are. Ego is who you'd like to be.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:21 am to tiigerr1
Our O line is banged up Bad. We may start a true freshmen on the O line. Our strongest poss has become our weakness. 3 starters are out.
Herbert to start undersized.
Herbert to start undersized.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:30 am to zeebo
quote:
Our defense will be the big story, shutout.
This is not going to happen,
that makes our fanbase look certifiably nuts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:31 am to gotygers
quote:
3 starters are out
3 OL starters, or Josh D, JJ and Shep?
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:34 am to litangel
the passive aggressive oregon fans put VT's fans to shame
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:35 am to litangel
quote:
Oregon wins 52-10
there is no chance in hell to this happening.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 8:35 am to litangel
quote:
C- Oregon gets a couple of quick scores and LSU is forced to play catch up, Lee is intercepted 3 times, and Oregon wins 52-10.
This scenario is not only not going to happen, but is virtually impossible. UO isn't playing Portland State...ya know.
LSU 34
Nike 27
Posted on 8/27/11 at 9:18 pm to goodgrin
As the originator of this thread, thanks for all the comments, I learned a lot. It seems that according to the majority of LSU fans, you have excellent depth in the secondary, and your depth issues in defense might be more at linebacker and a little bit on the line. I learned that the LSU offensive line is a little bet dinged up, and that might be an issue against Oregon.
These two facts make me lean toward a defensive struggle in the final score. Oregon games tend to have more scores because more plays are run because of the Ducks pacing, so 21-17 is a pretty low score for a Duck game, and 15-13, last years score Oregon at Cal is really low.
I think we might be looking in that range for a score. Maybe 17-13.
But despite all the abuse I took for the 52-10 Oregon scenario, I still think that is a real possibility. The thing LSU fans may not know about Oregon, is that can put up 21 Points in less than 5 minutes better than any team in the nation. If LSU just has a short attention lapse, boom, and then if they get way behind, with the current players, they are not set up for a comeback, that is why I saw 3 interceptions in the 52-10 scenario.
Maybe to be fair I could add a LSU 34-6 scenario. It would be just as dominant as Oregon 52-10 but just wouldn't have the point spread cause the Ducks are more explosive on offense.
But in my heart, I see it as a close game, odds about even as to who wins, or an Oregon blowout.
These two facts make me lean toward a defensive struggle in the final score. Oregon games tend to have more scores because more plays are run because of the Ducks pacing, so 21-17 is a pretty low score for a Duck game, and 15-13, last years score Oregon at Cal is really low.
I think we might be looking in that range for a score. Maybe 17-13.
But despite all the abuse I took for the 52-10 Oregon scenario, I still think that is a real possibility. The thing LSU fans may not know about Oregon, is that can put up 21 Points in less than 5 minutes better than any team in the nation. If LSU just has a short attention lapse, boom, and then if they get way behind, with the current players, they are not set up for a comeback, that is why I saw 3 interceptions in the 52-10 scenario.
Maybe to be fair I could add a LSU 34-6 scenario. It would be just as dominant as Oregon 52-10 but just wouldn't have the point spread cause the Ducks are more explosive on offense.
But in my heart, I see it as a close game, odds about even as to who wins, or an Oregon blowout.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:04 pm to litangel
Did you really just say that DT is better than any QB we've seen in the SEC????
You do know we played against Ryan Mallet & Cam Newton??? DT is OK, so let's not get overboard with ridiculous statements like that one.
You do know we played against Ryan Mallet & Cam Newton??? DT is OK, so let's not get overboard with ridiculous statements like that one.
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:09 pm to litangel
And I also don't understand how the HELL you think Chip Kelly is a better coach!!!
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:21 pm to fan251
quote:
Did you really just say that DT is better than any QB we've seen in the SEC????
He said in the SEC ( i would assume currently), don't think he said "ever"
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News