View in: Desktop
Copyright @2018 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
No Catches for WR'sPosted by JerseyTiger07 on 10/22/17 at 8:09 am
17
0First off, this is not a bashing of the offense. Nearly 600 total yards and almost 400 rushing. LSU moved the ball at will but it is just crazy that not one reception for WR's. Obviously, we won't win in 2 weeks if that happens but maybe this will give the Bama D more to think about...covering backs and TE's in the passing game.
Again, 3 SEC wins in a row is a great thing after Troy. Just hope the WR produce more the remainder of the year.
Again, 3 SEC wins in a row is a great thing after Troy. Just hope the WR produce more the remainder of the year.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by monsterballads on 10/22/17 at 8:16 am to JerseyTiger07
With no downfield passing To WR’s i don’t know how LSU is going to beat Bama
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by TaderSalad 
on 10/22/17 at 8:17 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:17 am to JerseyTiger07Our Wrs have to catch balls that hit them in the hands. I believe it was Sullivan who dropped one in the end zone. I cant remember all of them, but our WRs had a few drops.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Laman1978 on 10/22/17 at 8:18 am to TaderSalad
on 10/22/17 at 8:18 am to TaderSaladGage dropped one that almost hit him in the face. That's the second time this season at least.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Deuces on 10/22/17 at 8:20 am to TaderSalad
on 10/22/17 at 8:20 am to TaderSaladquote:
Our Wrs have to catch balls that hit them in the hands. I believe it was Sullivan who dropped one in the end zone. I cant remember all of them, but our WRs had a few drops.
I'd give the corner credit for that one. Sullivan hauled it in but he knocked it out.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by JerseyTiger07 on 10/22/17 at 8:21 am to TaderSalad
You are right and Gage dropped another. But Etling only had 4 incompletions and those are 2. So we didn't really even throw to the WR's. Its like giving up on the run to early in a game. Again, the game didn't really call for us to throw that much because we ran on them at will.
Maybe we could have worked on some things up 20+ points. Nice win though.
Maybe we could have worked on some things up 20+ points. Nice win though.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Laman1978 on 10/22/17 at 8:22 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:22 am to JerseyTiger07quote:We used to bitch about the TEs and RBs not being targeted when they're open...
No Catches for WR's
I was happy with last night. Now future opponents will have to scheme for that, meaning our WRs will draw more single coverage.
This post was edited on 10/22 at 8:27 am
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by lsu xman on 10/22/17 at 8:23 am to JerseyTiger07
Chark went for 150 the week before to 0 yards this week.
I feel sorry for LSU wr's.
I feel sorry for LSU wr's.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Antonio Moss on 10/22/17 at 8:23 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:23 am to JerseyTiger07Etling is exremely limited
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by JerseyTiger07 on 10/22/17 at 8:24 am to Laman1978
I'm not really complaining. Can't we have both? WR and TE & RB's catching the ball in a single game. I actually said Bama will now need to account for TE's and RB's in original post. 
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by tigereye58 on 10/22/17 at 8:26 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:26 am to JerseyTiger07I'm not sure how many times this happened but sometimes the TE or RB line up in the slot which is really like passing to a WR. There were quite a few plays with Guice lined up as a WR. It also forces them to cover everyone on the field. Canada must have seen something as a weakness to lean in this direction. Obviously it worked.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by JimmyHDeridderhigh 
on 10/22/17 at 8:27 am to monsterballads
on 10/22/17 at 8:27 am to monsterballads Saban doesn't adapt well to change.
Run for almost 400 on OM, Bama preps to stop the run with blitzes and safeties. Instead Canada challenges the secondary with a confident Etling.
Run for almost 400 on OM, Bama preps to stop the run with blitzes and safeties. Instead Canada challenges the secondary with a confident Etling.
This post was edited on 10/22 at 8:29 am
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Laman1978 on 10/22/17 at 8:28 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:28 am to JerseyTiger07quote:Absolutely! It's coming... HOPEFULLY!
Can't we have both? WR and TE & RB's catching the ball in a single game
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by JimmyHDeridderhigh on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to JerseyTiger07FanATICS seriously. There's one game and one game only LSU circles on the schedule and that's bama. Do you honestly think Canada hasn't been planning for Bama all season?
I'm calling it now. Bamas focus on UGA will let LSU surprised them with a rb and down field passing attack. Bama may win but everyone will look much differently on Canada and LSU after this game.
I'm calling it now. Bamas focus on UGA will let LSU surprised them with a rb and down field passing attack. Bama may win but everyone will look much differently on Canada and LSU after this game.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by boxcar willie on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to Laman1978
on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to Laman1978they took what the defense was giving and in this game it as the TE's and RB's. I'm just happy that we have an OC who knows that TE's and RB's are eligible recievers
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Lester Earl 
on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to lsu xman
on 10/22/17 at 8:32 am to lsu xmanquote:
Chark went for 150 the week before to 0 yards this week.
I feel sorry for LSU wr's.
He's been non existent in 3 of 4 SEC games. I mean it's not that shocking
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Pauldean on 10/22/17 at 8:33 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:33 am to JerseyTiger07On 5-7 step drops Etling was scrambling for his life.
It's a trade off. Short and intermediate passes to TE and RB or put extra pressure on OL to pass block.
It's a trade off. Short and intermediate passes to TE and RB or put extra pressure on OL to pass block.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by tigers32 on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to JerseyTiger07Hard to argue with the play calling last night but wish we'd get the WR's more involved. And I don't mean jet sweeps.
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Laman1978 on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to boxcar willie
on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to boxcar williequote:THIS
they took what the defense was giving and in this game it as the TE's and RB's. I'm just happy that we have an OC who knows that TE's and RB's are eligible recievers
re: No Catches for WR'sPosted by Jay Quest 
on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to JerseyTiger07
on 10/22/17 at 8:37 am to JerseyTiger07LSU only threw the ball 13 times last night. Obviously the emphasis and focus of the gameplan was on the run (54 attempts).
I would expect, at least hope, to see more balance in two weeks.
I would expect, at least hope, to see more balance in two weeks.
This post was edited on 10/22 at 8:39 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News