Started By
Message

re: My Breakout Grades of the Baseball Team 3 Weeks In

Posted on 3/4/25 at 11:31 pm to
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
7786 posts
Posted on 3/4/25 at 11:31 pm to
Elite speed and defense at a premier defensive position to go along with above average hitting. Pretty solid 9 hole while one of your most proven left handed bats is in a slump.

And you're only afforded that luxury because you managed to get a top 10 HS recruit, who you've been recruiting for a decade, to campus, all while developing your other outfield bats.

Jay Johnson
This post was edited on 3/4/25 at 11:33 pm
Posted by Classy Doge
Member since Nov 2021
4172 posts
Posted on 3/4/25 at 11:49 pm to
Let's geaux
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
5249 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Elite speed


Doesn’t show on the basepaths

quote:

defense at a premier defensive position


Curiel plenty capable. Stanfield showed he struggles tracking balls when running back. Not even close to catching that one last night. Missed it by a foot with his glove.

quote:

above average hitting.
.

This is highly debatable and to be seen

quote:

Pretty solid 9 hole


This is basically a confession he’s not very good. Larson has real upside with the bat.

quote:

you managed to get a top 10 HS recruit


I agree Curiel is better and should be playing CF


Posted by lsurulz1515
Member since Mar 2007
7417 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:14 am to
You are a miserable human being, Magician2
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70937 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Doesn’t show on the basepaths



You havent paid attention much then, he stretched what should have been a double into a triple and it was very impressive. Because they arent trying to swipe a bag with him every game doesnt mean he isnt the fastest player on the team, theyve said he is multiple times. Also why he plays CF. He's ran down a number of balls that would be tough to get to making diving catches this year.


quote:

Stanfield showed he struggles tracking balls when running back.


This literally has happened once and it was a little windy to start last night.


quote:

This is highly debatable and to be seen (in regards to above average hitting)



He hit .276-.281 in 2 years starting at Auburn, thats not debatable.


quote:

This is basically a confession he’s not very good. Larson has real upside with the bat.



So Milam isnt good either because he gets thrown in the 6-8 hole at times?



Why are you trying to take a premium defensive player hitting .333 with a.469 OBP and has hit plenty of SEC pitching in the past out of the lineup exactly?
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 8:24 am
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
5249 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:29 am to
quote:

You havent paid attention much then


Sure I have. His speed is overrated

quote:

He's ran down a number of balls that would be tough to get to.


I think Curiel could get to these

quote:

This literally has happened once and it was a little windy to start last night.


Concerning look

quote:

He hit .276-.281 in 2 years starting at Auburn


That’s not great. Hits the ball in the air too much. My point is Larson is a better bat.

quote:

So Milam isnt good either because he gets thrown in the 6-8 hole at times?


You answered your own question. If the coach puts 5-6 hitters over you then it means you’re not top 5-6 in his eyes. So this team had better rake to prove they’re loaded.

Schimpf was a good 9-hole hitter but that was on a national championship team with multiple 1st Round picks in the batting order
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70937 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Sure I have. His speed is overrated


You're wrong.

quote:

I think Curiel could get to these



Maybe he could, but again Stanfield is the fastest player on the team, is hitting well and getting on base, replacing him and putting a significantly worse outfielder out there currently struggling at the plate in Larson would be a stupid move. Larson has had 1 hit (A single) since the very first series of this season. He is struggling and looking plain bad at the plate recently, on top of that, is one of the worst defensive outfielders we have...and you'd rather see him out there than Stanfield. Pretty laughable right now. Taking our not struggling at the plate best defensive outfielder (in Jay's eye, since he starts pretty much every game in CF) and replacing them with a guy who has 1 hit in the last like 9 games and is significantly way worse an outfielder is pretty hilarious. Thank God you arent the coach.


quote:

That’s not great. Hits the ball in the air too much. My point is Larson is a better bat.



You literally replied to someone saying he's an above average hitter, .276-.281 is pretty much the definition of that, and as we saw with Braswell, could improve from he came from on their previous team.


quote:

You answered your own question. If the coach puts 5-6 hitters over you then it means you’re not top 5-6 in his eyes.


Again, a pretty dumb assertion. But nothing shocking coming from you.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 8:43 am
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
7786 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Doesn’t show on the basepaths

Do you know that there are things guys can do with speed besides steal bases? He's scored from 2nd on balls that haven't left the infield. Stretched errors from 1st to 3rd on plays where 99% of guys aren't even thinking of going past 2nd, scored from 2nd every single time the ball has entered the outfield. Shockingly, you're wrong.
quote:

Curiel plenty capable. Stanfield showed he struggles tracking balls when running back. Not even close to catching that one last night. Missed it by a foot with his glove.

Stanfield didn't grab a ball by about 12 inches while running straight back with the wind carrying the ball, while turning over his shoulder, and now his defense is discounted. Got it. We're just going to ignore the plethora of plays he's made this season. shite, he's made better plays in center in 10 games than any of our center fielders have made in entire seasons.
quote:

This is highly debatable and to be seen

Guy who hit .280 in the SEC and is hitting .333 right now can be considered an average to above average bat. That is not debatable.
quote:

This is basically a confession he’s not very good. Larson has real upside with the bat.

Well, no, it's not. It was me being tongue in cheek because I think Stanfield has more potential than most players on the roster and he does tons of things at a very high level.
quote:

I agree Curiel is better and should be playing CF

Curiel is not better than Stanfield defensively as of March 5, 2025. He is incredible (hat tip to Jay for getting him to campus) but Stanfield is better leading the OF.

Also hilarious that you spawned this argument by insulting Larson, then when I pushed back on that stupid post propping up another player, you had to use Larson's potential and ability to bring that other player down.

It's honestly pathetic how bad you are at this.
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
7786 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

If the coach puts 5-6 hitters over you then it means you’re not top 5-6 in his eyes.
A coach that notoriously flips L/R hitters in the order? Retard.
quote:

Schimpf was a good 9-hole hitter but that was on a national championship team with multiple 1st Round picks in the batting order

Ryan Schimpf had 2nd highest BA, highest SLG, second highest OBP, and highest OPS on that team. He then had the 4th most successful professional career.

Shocking that his spot in the order didn't dictate his ability to hit the baseball.

Even when you try and use data to make a point, you do the opposite. Truly incredible.
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
5249 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Curiel is not better than Stanfield defensively as of March 5, 2025. He is incredible (hat tip to Jay for getting him to campus) but Stanfield is better leading the OF.


I disagree. Negligible difference on defense, but what I think would definitely be better is if we get Larson up to speed. I think he'll hit for same or better average than Stanfield AND give you some pop which Chris is far less likely to do
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
5249 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

A coach that notoriously flips L/R hitters in the order


Yep. Good hitters hit in the top 4-5, it doesn't matter if you do a handstand while swinging

quote:

Even when you try and use data to make a point, you do the opposite.


That's not data based lol. It's just a fact that Ryan batted 9th in a loaded order with multiple 1st Rounders in it

This team is not that. If Milam was a great hitter he'd be higher in this order. Period.
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 17Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram