- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Stoops for DC?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:07 pm to TheCaterpillar
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:07 pm to TheCaterpillar
"Since 2003", which meant his first stint in Norman was not included.
1
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:07 pm to BuckheadBetty
quote:You think the athletic director at a school doesn't have a say in what coaches his school hires?
You don't think its solely Miles decision? You've lost your mind.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:08 pm to LSUVA
Not sure I trust this guys sources. Nothing about this agrees with any of the other information we've seen out there.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:08 pm to GRTiger
quote:
"Since 2003", which meant his first stint in Norman was not included.
With Venables?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:09 pm to BuckheadBetty
quote:
ou don't think its solely Miles decision?
Clearly not
Its not his money thats going to pay the DC
The only question left, Is Alleva closing the purse or is the TAF closing the purse on Miles?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:09 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Offenses have greatly changed since 1999-03.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:09 pm to bencoleman
quote:
I didn't say anything to you so you can GFY you fricking worm
Calm down and take a deep breath....
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:10 pm to danman6336
Nope. Not at a big time school.
Salary is obviously out of the coaches hands but who they hire isn't as long as someone who has stayed out of trouble isn't offered.
Salary is obviously out of the coaches hands but who they hire isn't as long as someone who has stayed out of trouble isn't offered.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:10 pm to TheCaterpillar
Yes, as co-dc. Giving all the credit to one half of that equation is pretty disingenuous. At least throw up the defensive stats with venables after Stoops left to become a hc if you want to do that.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:11 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
With Venables?
Exactly why I'm excluding that timeframe. Stoops got the HC gig after, but his brother probably had a lot to do with that. Also, a defensive minded HC like Mike Stoops should field salty defenses every year. He didn't.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:13 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Yes, as co-dc. Giving all the credit to one half of that equation is pretty disingenuous. At least throw up the defensive stats with venables after Stoops left to become a hc if you want to do that.
If you want to fawn over a stint from a decade ago, go ahead.
He's had 4 defenses ranked in the top 25, and 3 in the top 10, in the last 15 years. In the last 10 years, he's had 1 defense ranked in the top 25 and none in the top 10.
That doesn't really sound that much better does it?
This post was edited on 1/3/15 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:15 pm to bencoleman
quote:Agreed. You continually embarrass yourself in most threads. Your violent threats are amusing considering you can't walk across the room unaided and without catching your breath. Or, at least that's what you've posted in the past.....
but I'm the one with issues
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:16 pm to LSUVA
Dearest God in heaven, don't let Les hire this guy. Tia.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:16 pm to gOLDTiger
quote:oh thank god. please let this be the case again. stoops is honestly the worst name we've heard yet.
Not sure I trust this guys sources. Nothing about this agrees with any of the other information we've seen out there.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:18 pm to RB10
I'm not fawning over anything. Just looking at the whole picture. Does that bother you? All of my posts have been questions, pragmatism, and fact based. And I also said I preferred CP after looking at Stoops history.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:19 pm to danman6336
quote:The AD hires the head coaches of each sport. The assistant coaches are hired by the head coaches, within a budget provided by the AD and TAF. That's how it works.
You think the athletic director at a school doesn't have a say in what coaches his school hires?
If the AD starts interfering by telling the head coaches who to hire or not hire, they will have recourse against him if he fires them in the future.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:20 pm to BayouBengal0505
So Dellenger wrote a blog post just parroting the info from the Oklahoma website.
I wish I was a journalist.
I wish I was a journalist.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:21 pm to GRTiger
Most recent decade and the years he's been by himself are not good. At all.
It changes nothing to count what he did from 1999-2003.
He has been bad for the entirety of the last decade.
It changes nothing to count what he did from 1999-2003.
He has been bad for the entirety of the last decade.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:21 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I'm not fawning over anything. Just looking at the whole picture. Does that bother you? All of my posts have been questions, pragmatism, and fact based. And I also said I preferred CP after looking at Stoops history.
It doesn't bother me at all. You just keep bringing up 1999-2003 like it really makes a difference. Stats from over 10 years ago generally don't mean a thing when hiring a coach.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:24 pm to BayouBengal0505
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News