Started By
Message

re: LSUAD is videotaping students chanting obscenities.

Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:08 am to
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:08 am to
Why should this be limited to the student section? Will they apply this rule in the suites where liquor is allowed because "it isn't a part of the stadium"? Oh, that's right, different rules when it fits the agenda of the university and the athletic department.

Posted by 20MuleTeam
West Hartford
Member since Sep 2012
3862 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:35 am to
More stupidity from Allevas office. He needs to be canned immediately.
Posted by Sherman Klump
Wellman College
Member since Jul 2011
4566 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:17 am to
quote:

The OP says tailgating on a street corner is illegal while shouting obscenities is not (or at least rarely enforced), therefore you can't compare one act against the other. The OP asks: Why wouldn't you pop a beer and barbeque on the street corner? A: Because you don't want to go to jail. The OP also asks: Why wouldn't you yell at someone to suck your prick on the same corner? A: Because you know such behavior is reprehensible and don't want to embarrass yourself. At some point it comes down to self-pride and self-awareness even at the relatively immature age range of 18-22. As far as policing the stadium, the OP thinks LSU Admin should modify the legal disclaimer on the back of the tickets by replacing "suggested" with "unlawful", define the behaviors, and state that violators are subject to removal from the stadium.


I agree. "Self-pride" and "self-awareness" doesn't get you kicked out of a game. As far as policing it, I think they shouldn't play it if 80% of the stadium has a problem when the student section sings it. They won't stop; it sucks. but that is the reality of the situation. Trying to police is it just a waste of time, money, and effort.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:29 am to
quote:

allscaster, I'm sure you are resting confident that you're making the world a better place with your little cause celebre.

Then again, wouldn't it be more worthwhile to defend "free speech" for something that actually has some redeeming value or utility?


Valpeaux, what balls doesn't realize (because he never bothered to ask-he just assumes) is that I support free speech, even when I don't agree with it. However what he mistakes is the idea of free speech with free speech without consequences. Depending on the circumstances, free speech is allowed but there are consequences that can arise. You are certainly free to yell "gun" in a crowded theater however there will likely be consequences when your "free speech" causes people to be hurt. If you make a threat against someone, there can be consequences to your "free speech". This idiot also doesn't realize that sometimes exercising that right to "free speech" may not be appropriate. I am willing to bet that if he went to work and started chanting STTDB, his chances to succeed there will likely decrease. But he is still free to go that route. Also, he is unwilling to acknowledge and respect that others have differing opinions on how this has been/is potentially going to be handled by the venue who provides this event, which is entirely theirs to regulate. It is printed very clearly on the tickets (essentially a contract) that every one of us accept to participate in this event. Lastly, he isn't even intelligent enough to realize that this isn't a "free speech" issue. The university reserves the right to monitor its events for activity that it deems inappropriate and stop that activity. They have taken all of the steps that they could that reasonable people would respond to (removing songs from the daily playlist, asking the students to exercise some self-restraint) and the students have now forced them to take more direct action. He doesn't realize that it is not the university's fault that this is potentially going to take place but it is the students.

Besides, I still can't understand how he can call everyone here the "language police" when we have no decision making authority at the university. He is trying hard to be a "rebel with a cause" but instead he is actually crying to be a "rebel without a clue".
Posted by Sherman Klump
Wellman College
Member since Jul 2011
4566 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:47 am to
quote:

I am willing to bet that if he went to work and started chanting STTDB, his chances to succeed there will likely decrease.


I was with you till here. You don't actually, in your heart of hearts, believe this is a good comparison and sheds light on your stance? Tiger Stadium is not the work place, people do not act the same at work as they do at Tiger Stadium. Just like people don't act the same at a bar as they do at work. People do not act the same at the fishing camp as they do at work. A comparison to such is foolish.
Posted by RedTigerRulz
BFE
Member since Oct 2013
15317 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Then again, wouldn't it be more worthwhile to defend "free speech" for something that actually has some redeeming value or utility?


No because he HAS to be right all the time.
Posted by TNTigerman
James Island
Member since Sep 2012
11811 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:04 am to
quote:

As far as policing it, I think they shouldn't play it if 80% of the stadium has a problem when the student section sings it. They won't stop; it sucks. but that is the reality of the situation. Trying to police is it just a waste of time, money, and effort.

I agree. Just stop playin' it. Problem solved.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:30 am to
quote:

I was with you till here. You don't actually, in your heart of hearts, believe this is a good comparison and sheds light on your stance? Tiger Stadium is not the work place, people do not act the same at work as they do at Tiger Stadium. Just like people don't act the same at a bar as they do at work. People do not act the same at the fishing camp as they do at work. A comparison to such is foolish.


As he likes to make analogies, this was simply an analogy to point out that because he has the "freedom" to act in this way doesn't make it appropriate or even acceptable. Any venue (fishing camp, work, free speech alley, Tiger Stadium, business meeting, bar, etc...) will have its own "standard" of what is more or less acceptable. I am not comparing the environment at Tiger Stadium to work any more than I would to a fishing camp outside of that it is a venue where what is acceptable is determined by the person/organization organizing an event there.
This post was edited on 12/17/13 at 9:32 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88713 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:31 am to
quote:

As he likes to make analogies


The issue is his analogies make sense, and yours was ridiculous. Someone as smart as you claim to be should easily see that.
Posted by aajdnj
Shreveport
Member since Oct 2007
31 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:33 am to
Anyone with serious issues about chants regarding felletio needs to deal with that issue somewhere other than a sports rant page. Students will be students. Parents (and the administration) need to quit helicoptering them and let them go through the awkward (but sometimes fun) stages of growing up. It doesn't take thousands of posts to know that.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:51 am to
quote:

The issue is his analogies make sense, and yours was ridiculous. Someone as smart as you claim to be should easily see that.


Since you seem to be incapable of comprehending this, I can give you what you might find to be a "more appropriate" analogy. How about if you attend a play at LSU. Would the chant be acceptable there? What do you think that the likely outcome would be. How about a benefit dinner for TAF? Or if you go see the BRSO's presentation of The Nutcracker? Would it be appropriate there? You are just as free to chant it there as you would be at Tiger Stadium but there would likely be consequences. Are you capable of understanding the analogy now?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88713 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Since you seem to be incapable of comprehending this, I can give you what you might find to be a "more appropriate" analogy. How about if you attend a play at LSU. Would the chant be acceptable there? What do you think that the likely outcome would be.


This is another terrible analogy. Is it common for the crowd to chant at plays now?
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:05 am to
quote:

This is another terrible analogy. Is it common for the crowd to chant at plays now?


I am done with you since you lack even the most basic comprehension and reasoning skills.
This post was edited on 12/17/13 at 10:07 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88713 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I am done with you since you lack even the most basic comprehension and reasoning skills.


Yea, chants at a play are remotely close to chants at a football game.

Posted by RedTigerRulz
BFE
Member since Oct 2013
15317 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Just don't be surprised when you end up in jail and also have a civil suit filed against you.


I'm good with this as long as they put me in the same cell block with Blackjackjackson!!!!
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Yea, chants at a play are remotely close to chants at a football game.


Do you have one more appropriate? You are simply looking for any reason, no matter how wild, to attempt to discount my comparison. In this case, chants are only secondary to the fact that it is a private, paid admission event which is put on by an organization which has the right and ability to determine what is acceptable or not acceptable for the event. But even in your line of thinking, how about answering the questions that I posed. Or answer what you think that any chanting of anything during one of these events would get you, since you seem to be all over the "free speech" argument.

I can't believe that I you are not able to understand the basics of this. You are obviously simply looking to troll for an argument, regardless of how far off topic you can drag this so unless you can either come up with a reasonable point that or answer the questions that I posed, this is the last time that I will respond to you.
Posted by lsulefty5
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
901 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:27 am to
At a play, you aren't screaming your face off trying to get the bad guys to mess up. Different social setting. The students chanted the song to All of the Lights which aren't event the lyrics to the song so the chanting will continue with or without the songs.
Who knows maybe this is 1984 and the LSU admin thought police will persecute us for even thinking such obscenities!
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88713 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

You are simply looking for any reason, no matter how wild


My reason to discount you wasnt very wild.

quote:

n this case, chants are only secondary to the fact that it is a private, paid admission event which is put on by an organization which has the right and ability to determine what is acceptable or not acceptable for the event.


Or it's because the audience is quiet at a play and not quiet at a football game. A chant would be incredibly out of place at a play, but perfectly acceptable at a football game.

But yea, it's a pretty wild concept.
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:35 am to
My problem is LSU is very selective in enforcement of "rules" and it is most evident with alcohol. Students are searched greatly for it. The remainder of the bowl part of the stadium gets searched a little. The suites, well, they pay lots of money so those rules don't apply and they can drink all they want and LSU sells it to them.

The same can be said for the policing of language. Has the university told Miles that if he is caught cussing on the field that they are going to dock his salary. He's the employee at the university. The students and their parents are the ones paying the tuition, room and board at LSU along with their student tickets yet they are treated with some disdain by the university. I, for one, am getting tired of this bullshite that universities become.

I am much more offended with LSU's wasteful spending on these PC positions that have become typical at everything government touches. They are the numerous "Vice Chancellors" of various nonsense titles such as "diversity awareness", "community outreach", etc. I'm also much more offended by how LSU under the new President, is above the laws of the state regarding hiring practices.

Yes, let's focus on the students chants in Tiger Stadium and not what is truly vulgar and obscene. I'm referring to the many nonsense "victims studies" degrees and programs as well as the numbers of bullshite, ever expanding "vice chancellors of nonsense causes and subjects" that LSU has created. You know, those 6 digit income ones that the ever increasing tuition rate hikes actually pay for but don't have anything to do with anything but giving well-connected good paying jobs. Let's not leave the professors out. Of course, the best are now treated with disdain, like Dr. Homberger was because her freshman biology class was "too hard" and she went through hell for having "standards of expectation" that used to be considered the norm at a university. Of course, those standards are tough and students are now viewed as being babies by them that must be protected from such rigours in the classroom but when you are in the stadium, then they'll "protect those offended by fowl language" with cameras to watch your every word. That is most offensive to me as an LSU alumnus and an American citizen.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 10:40 am to
quote:

At a play, you aren't screaming your face off trying to get the bad guys to mess up. Different social setting. The students chanted the song to All of the Lights which aren't event the lyrics to the song so the chanting will continue with or without the songs.


Yes, it is a different social setting and a very good point. Even more, that illustrates well how inappropriate this or any chant would be at a private, ticketed event like this and that the organization what puts it on would reserve the right to remove you from the event, if they choose to.
Jump to page
Page First 24 25 26 27 28 ... 45
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 45Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram