- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU: weak in the QB stable
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:34 am to tiger88
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:34 am to tiger88
quote:
You're introducing the strawman fallacy in your post: I never said any QB on the roster will be "bad"
Hmmm...yeah, you never said 'bad', but "an unacceptable liability", and "Why is LSU constantly plagued at the most critical position?" might be worse than just saying they are bad.
quote:
seriously, after Mett we have basically an average bunch of horses in the stable, and I'm including all recent committments. And the scary thing is, we really haven't seen enough of Mett. And this is, in my opinion, an unacceptable liability to a program such as LSU's, or should be given the $ being paid to *CLM. Were there truly no prospects in the country (or elsewhere) interested in LSU remaining after GK decommited?
Why is LSU constantly plagued at the most critical position? And I'm talking since Tommy Hodson days.
quote:
based on the information I have, I can't say they will be good
0
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:35 am to Ice Cold
someone please hit this thread with the GTFO stick.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:35 am to N.O. via West-Cal
I never said all prior LSU QBs were bad. Damn, it's really either left or right in the Rant, isn't it?
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB of the, e.g., Luck, Barcley, Griffin, and Wilson variety.
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB of the, e.g., Luck, Barcley, Griffin, and Wilson variety.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 11:37 am
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:37 am to tiger88
quote:How many of them have won national championships, or even played in a BCS title game?
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB of the, e.g., Luck, Barcley, Griffen, and Wilson variety.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:37 am to tiger88
quote:
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB of the, e.g., Luck, Barcley, Griffen, and Wilson variety.
maybe we have....you don't fricking know. thats our point. so just sit back, relax, and stop with the stupid threads.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:38 am to tiger88
quote:
I never said all prior LSU QBs were bad.
quote:
Why is LSU constantly plagued at the most critical position? And I'm talking since Tommy Hodson days.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:38 am to stho381
quote:
Noone cares if you have 4 QBs that can start right now, becasue if you had 4 QBs that could start right now, 3 would be transferring out. You need a definitive starter who is familiar with playbook, a couple backups who are being groomed, and a RS that is getting familiar with the program. We have that.
One of the best posts I've EVER seen on TD........seriously
OP you are so dumb
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:38 am to Ice Cold
quote:
How many of them have won national championships, or even played in a BCS title game?
irrelevant as I'm talking about the skill level of one position.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:38 am to tiger88
quote:
I never said all prior LSU QBs were bad.
Jesus, man...
Are you not able to comprehend your own writing?
How the frick is saying current players are a 'liability to the program', and that we've been 'plagued' at that position for years NOT saying that they are bad?
I mean...FO REAL?
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:40 am to tiger88
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 11:43 am
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am to RummelTiger
quote:
How the frick is saying current players are a 'liability to the program
Rummel,
the not having a better vetted stable is the unacceptable liability.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am to tiger88
quote:
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB
That end up the #1 NFL pick or one who thows 6 TDs for GB in one game???
That the kinda QBs we never get at LSU?
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:42 am to tiger88
quote:
I can shake a pomp pomp with the best of them. But, no, I'd rather not stick my head in the sand, or trust *CLM completely right now given how he "managed" the last game.
This post right here shows what a dumbass you are. You don't trust the coach that went 13-1 while blowing out everyone except the best Bama team of all time? Yet you trust your own judgement about players abilities that you have need seen take a snap. Come on bruh. Miles isn't above reproach but we just had the 3rd best season in Tigers history an yet you want to shite on our qb's. For the last 3 yrs our qb play has been abg at best ad we have won a lot of games. All we need is for a qb to not turn the ball over, we don't need a Manning or Brady.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:45 am to tiger88
what i got out of this thread....
you're not as smart as you think you are. perhaps you should just request a ban and start over with a new name because your last two threads have made you look stupid as shite.
quote:decided to start another thread in a subtle attempt to bash the LSU coaching staff and got his arse completely handed to him.
tiger88
you're not as smart as you think you are. perhaps you should just request a ban and start over with a new name because your last two threads have made you look stupid as shite.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:47 am to tiger88
quote:
I'm talking about LSU landing the types of QB of the, e.g., Luck, Barcley, Griffin, and Wilson variety
Barkley was the only one that was considered a can't miss 5 star prospect. The rest were 4 stars. Jerrard Randall is also a 4 star. just admit that you don't have a clue what kind of QB's we have on our roster and quit starting dumb threads
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:48 am to Choctaw
quote:
decided to start another thread in a subtle attempt to bash the LSU coaching staff and got his arse completely handed to him.
you're not as smart as you think you are. perhaps you should just request a ban and start over with a new name because your last two threads have made you look stupid as shite.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 11:49 am
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:49 am to tiger88
quote:
the not having a better vetted stable is the unacceptable liability.
So, if they were all 5*, then you'd be cool with that?
Because, I mean, we do have 3 4* (Randall, Liggins, and Rivers) depending on what recruiting service you look at...
Yeah, 4* backing up a 5*...shitty vetting indeed.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:50 am to Rickdaddy4188
We don't need a rock star at QB, just someone the coaches trust. We did not have that this year, and still had the most wins ever. If Met and company can deliver smart play, we can beat anyone we play in the next two years.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:50 am to RummelTiger
Good Lawd this is really dumb.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:51 am to RummelTiger
I dot know why posters on here think it's cool to be doom and gloOm
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News