- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU MBKB: Is there now precedence for RJ Luis to be eligible?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:45 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Wouldn’t this ruling be precedence for declaring RJ Luis eligible?
Both accepted money from professional teams
Both made no official roster
Both participated in no affiliated games with their respective franchise.
And as far as I’m aware, RJ Luis is and has been remaining around the program, correct?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:50 pm to MrWiseGuy
I believe RJ Luis played in games.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:55 pm to LSBoosie
Luis was waived by the Celtics before signing an Exhibit 10 contract with the Maine Celtics, Boston's G League affiliate. The Maine Celtics then waived Luis, who was injured, before he played a game.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:55 pm to LSBoosie
quote:He played in pre season games and was traded. Had a surgery and never played in any summer league or regular season games.
I believe RJ Luis played in games.
I don't believe pre-season games count toward a player's service time/tenure.
If the UT kid is ruled eligible, I don't know how it doesn't help with Luis.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:59 pm to PP7 for heisman
I have no idea if pre season games count towards service or tenure in the NBA. I’m just saying that he played in games and the UT guy didn’t. That’s the difference between the two.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:22 pm to MrWiseGuy
The NCAA doesn't care about precedence. They've shown that time and time again. The only thing consistent about their rulings are their inconsistencies.
This post was edited on 8/7/26 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
U.S. District Judge Charlotte Sweeney
the question is did she have the authority to make that ruling
Posted on 8/7/26 at 5:07 pm to LSBoosie
quote:That's certainly what the NCAA will argue.
I have no idea if pre season games count towards service or tenure in the NBA. I’m just saying that he played in games and the UT guy didn’t. That’s the difference between the two.
After looking into it a little more, players do not accrue service time, nor do they receive games checks for pre-season competition in the NBA. So, by NBA standards, he never appeared in a game.
What (imo) differentiates the two is Luis signed a contract with an NBA orginzation after going undrafted, whereas the UT guy didn't.
Still, Luis didn't sign a guaranteed NBA contract. He signed a two way deal, didn't play in the SL, was traded, waived, signed a 10 day with $0 guaranteed (payment only guaranteed if he made the roster), was waived, and never actually appeared on the G-league roster.
So at most he got a signing bonus as part of his UDFA or 10 day contracts. So we're talking, at the absolute ceiling, he could've gotten about $170k. It's very possible he never got a direct deposit from any of these contracts.
He's got a much stronger case than I originally thought.
More than ever do I wish I tried harder for an externship with the NCAAs counsel in between semesters during law school
This post was edited on 8/7/26 at 5:09 pm
Popular
Back to top
3






