- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU defensive starters in Texas Bowl and number of starts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:01 am to ibleedprplngld
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:01 am to ibleedprplngld
Was West Weeks injured? Confused why he wouldn’t want to play in potentially his last game ever if he wasn’t.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:01 am to Klark Kent
quote:
stupid thread from a stupid poster. log out
Posting facts is stupid? LOL sorry facts hurt your little feelings!
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:02 am to Shanks A Lot
sure, disingenuous facts while ignoring the bigger picture of op outs. all so you can paint a ridiculous irrelevant point. log out
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 9:03 am
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:02 am to Shanks A Lot
quote:
Gilbert 12 starts at LSU (24 starts overall)
First start at this position.
quote:
Spears 4 starts at LSU
Not the FT starter at this position. His starts were previous years.
Butler and Keyes were 2nd string. Just because they’ve started due to injury before doesn’t mean they are starters. Don’t be stupid.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:04 am to bayou85
quote:
Just because they’ve started due to injury before doesn’t mean they are starters. Don’t be stupid.
Plenty enough starts and playing time to not get dominated by Houston.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:06 am to ibleedprplngld
quote:
So your take is not having Haulcey, the Weeks brothers, Delane, or Perkins had zero impact on the defensive performance?
I don’t think that’s what he said. The point is that there was plenty of experience out there for the defense to not get a complete pass. The defense got worked just like they have several times this year, unable to get ahead early in the series, unable to stop QB runs or defend the middle of the field.
Houston nearly won ToP on scoring drives, and that was after going down 14 pts. I would expect someone that is getting elite money like Baker to be more effective with just about any 11 players on our roster.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:06 am to Shanks A Lot
Why are you getting all flustered over some meaningless bowl game?
You obviously have zero knowledge of football, So Stop posting. We got enough jackasses on here as is.
You obviously have zero knowledge of football, So Stop posting. We got enough jackasses on here as is.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:06 am to Klark Kent
quote:
sure, disingenuous facts while ignoring the bigger picture of op outs. all so you can paint a ridiculous irrelevant point. log out
If you don’t think that they have enough starts and playing time under their belt to defeat the 64th ranked offense in Houston then you’re full of it. Gave up the most TD passes to Weigman all year!
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:07 am to OceanMan
quote:
I don’t think that’s what he said. The point is that there was plenty of experience out there for the defense to not get a complete pass. The defense got worked just like they have several times this year, unable to get ahead early in the series, unable to stop QB runs or defend the middle of the field. Houston nearly won ToP on scoring drives, and that was after going down 14 pts. I would expect someone that is getting elite money like Baker to be more effective with just about any 11 players on our roster.
THIS
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:08 am to HarryHoudini
quote:
Why are you getting all flustered over some meaningless bowl game? You obviously have zero knowledge of football, So Stop posting. We got enough retards on here as is.
It’s a sports message board LOL. Don’t be the fun police.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:11 am to rlebl39
quote:
Starting a new thread to try and make this low IQ point. 1) Most of those players were rotational guys. 2) missing your Thorpe award finalist at CB, all your starting linebackers, several others on D line doesn’t matter?
Again, someone is making the point that star players are more important than being able to scheme without them.
Yes, having all the starters available should improve expectations, but no having them should not throw expectations out the window.
But we have people trying to make this obviously flawed argument while calling people low IQ.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:19 am to Shanks A Lot
Related, but Cooley was horrible tonight.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:20 am to Shanks A Lot
Of those you listed only a few of them were any more than part time contributors in the overall scheme of things. Butler and Gilbert are hardly household names.
Look, the defense didn't play well. Haulcey was veteran who helped make the secondary more cohesive. His absence was huge. Delane had an AA season and was sorely missed. The entire linebacking corp was missing.
To be honest, I thought Baker got a lot out of the defense this year considering the talent and the injuries. It pretty hard to cook a gourmet meal without having the proper quality ingredients.
The past is the past. On to the future. It will have some bumps in the road but at least there is hope now.
BTW, your user name might be more accurate if you replaced Shanks with Sucks.
Look, the defense didn't play well. Haulcey was veteran who helped make the secondary more cohesive. His absence was huge. Delane had an AA season and was sorely missed. The entire linebacking corp was missing.
To be honest, I thought Baker got a lot out of the defense this year considering the talent and the injuries. It pretty hard to cook a gourmet meal without having the proper quality ingredients.
The past is the past. On to the future. It will have some bumps in the road but at least there is hope now.
quote:
Shanks A Lot
BTW, your user name might be more accurate if you replaced Shanks with Sucks.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 9:24 am
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:22 am to Shanks A Lot
quote:
If you don’t think that they have enough starts and playing time under their belt to defeat the 64th ranked offense in Houston then you’re full of it. Gave up the most TD passes to Weigman all year!
It’s a bit surprising that you are getting so much push back on this point. It was a terrible defensive showing last night. Rather than focusing on the players that weren’t there, it’s reasonable to focus on the players that were, and the coaches that will be retained.
But then you check other threads and they want to put this on Frank Wilson, who doesn’t coach defense and is out the door.
LSU fans are very tribal in allegiance to coaches. It’s strange for people that want to judge the team objectively, because you have to overcome ridiculous assumptions based on these allegiances.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:32 am to OceanMan
quote:
Again, someone is making the point that star players are more important than being able to scheme without them. Yes, having all the starters available should improve expectations, but no having them should not throw expectations out the window. But we have people trying to make this obviously flawed argument while calling people low IQ.
I’m not going to argue the defense played well, they did not obviously. But I do not understand yall saying Baker sucks and Kiffin needs to fire him already.
Do you not understand that missing these players has an impact on guys like Pickett who had a bad game last night for example?
Missing Delane and Haulcey has a huge impact on any CB but especially a true freshman. Without Delane now Pickett is your #1 and is going to get picked on. Without Haulcey you don’t have dependable safety coverage over the top.
Missing Perkins and the D line impacts guys like Pickett as well because now you have to cover longer.
Missing your best players has an impact on everyone. Your expectations for role players playing in a meaningless bowl game for a team that just fired its coach, has a new staff coming in, has players opting out, and others deciding where they are playing next year are unrealistic expectations.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:34 am to Shanks A Lot
Nearly 1/3 of Houston’s 32 first downs were due to stupid LSU penalties.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:42 am to rlebl39
Kinda embarrassing that Haulcy didn’t play and LSU ends up losing to the school they bought him from.
Posters on this site were dogging Perkins all year calling him a liability especially against a dual threat qb but now they are using it as an excuse to why LSU lost.
Delane was a big loss. Pickett was dominated.
All I read all year was how the d-line was a highlight of this team. Zero sacks yesterday.
Baker is among the highest paid DCs in cfb. He deserves to be ridiculed after that performance.
Posters on this site were dogging Perkins all year calling him a liability especially against a dual threat qb but now they are using it as an excuse to why LSU lost.
Delane was a big loss. Pickett was dominated.
All I read all year was how the d-line was a highlight of this team. Zero sacks yesterday.
Baker is among the highest paid DCs in cfb. He deserves to be ridiculed after that performance.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:43 am to BitBuster
quote:
Nearly 1/3 of Houston’s 32 first downs were due to stupid LSU penalties.
Due to poor coaching.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:51 am to Shanks A Lot
Don’t waste your time arguing with this loser. LSU played without 5 of their best defensive players. Take 5 of Houston’s best players off the field and they lose. He’s an idiot.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:55 am to Shanks A Lot
quote:
Baker is among the highest paid DCs in cfb. He deserves to be ridiculed after that performance.
Baker and this defense is also the only reason this team is bowl eligible this season.
Popular
Back to top


0


