- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:38 pm to sgallo3
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:38 pm to sgallo3
quote:I know I'm far behind but what happened doesn't constitute an emergency.
You are recommended to follow at those distances because they allow you to stop in case of an emergency
I'll ignore the fact that you said, "you are recommended", because that leaves a lot of grey.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:40 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
I'll ignore the fact that you said, "you are recommended", because that leaves a lot of grey.
There is a grey area but it is still the law.
Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 32:81 establishes the "following too closely" offense, requiring drivers to maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front, and creates a legal presumption that the driver who rear-ends another vehicle is at fault.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:42 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 32:81 establishes the "following too closely" offense, requiring drivers to maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front, and creates a legal presumption that the driver who rear-ends another vehicle is at fault.
But she didn’t rear end anyone, so what exactly is your argument? If anything, she swerved the wrong way.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:43 pm to RB10
"A grand jury was set to hear the case on April 14, 2025."
That's all I could find. Did you see something that said all three charges were still pending?
Hard to believe the DA would seek indictment on those two charges when the DA's report said the evidence didn't support them.
Of course, that wouldn't effect the homicide charge.
That's all I could find. Did you see something that said all three charges were still pending?
Hard to believe the DA would seek indictment on those two charges when the DA's report said the evidence didn't support them.
Of course, that wouldn't effect the homicide charge.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:44 pm to jangalang
The lawyer looks bad for a few reasons... heavily cropped and edited videos, contradictions, playing it all out in the media, etc... Plus the locals all know he's slime.
Whatever you choose to believe about funyuns, its a losing game. She gets to say that she was taking evasive action and made the best split second judgement for her own survival that she could. Trying to "prove" that she was too close, when the law doesn't even define what "too close" is, is such a waste of time. Lacy doesn't get to hide behind evasive actions. He willfully violated the law. And all, I mean ALL, of the evidence points to him as the lynchpin of the accident.
Whatever you choose to believe about funyuns, its a losing game. She gets to say that she was taking evasive action and made the best split second judgement for her own survival that she could. Trying to "prove" that she was too close, when the law doesn't even define what "too close" is, is such a waste of time. Lacy doesn't get to hide behind evasive actions. He willfully violated the law. And all, I mean ALL, of the evidence points to him as the lynchpin of the accident.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:45 pm to jmh5724
dont feed the retards.
thanks
thanks
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to jmh5724
quote:
But she didn’t rear end anyone, so what exactly is your argument? If anything, she swerved the wrong way.
Because she swerved into another lane to avoid rear ending the truck in her lane.
That does not mean she wasn't following too closely.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to zuluboudreaux
That stupid attorney that said the video actually exonerates Lacy insults the intelligence of everyone but him. What a fool.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
That's all I could find. Did you see something that said all three charges were still pending?
Hard to believe the DA would seek indictment on those two charges when the DA's report said the evidence didn't support them.
Of course, that wouldn't affect the homicide charge.
He was being charged with negligent homicide, hit and run and reckless endangerment.
Leaving the scene was not listed and is what the DA was referring to. It may have been on there originally and removed. I don’t know about that, but the other 3 charges were at least going to a grand jury.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm to RB10
I first heard that the "no leaving the scene" language was on page 5 of the DA's investigation from Lacy's attorney's latest video.
Then I found it in the link which I posted, which someone else had already posted here.
This has no bearing on whether or not Lacy was culpable in the death.
Then I found it in the link which I posted, which someone else had already posted here.
This has no bearing on whether or not Lacy was culpable in the death.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm to sgallo3
quote:Why would I want to think about it like OSHA rules when it's traffic rules that are important?
Think of it like OSHA rules
To fit your narrative?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
IT DOES NOT MATTER
it absolutely does
typing it like that doesn’t make it not matter
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Because she swerved into another lane to avoid rear ending the truck in her lane.
That does not mean she wasn't following too closely.
It doesn't mean she was either. It just means she decided to swerve. Just like the guy in the gold truck... just like Lacy.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
To fit your narrative?
Im not the DA. It was in the DA's report that the Kia was following too closely/tailgating.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:53 pm to RB10
quote:Don't know if it's true but someone said Kyren's insurance already paid out to everyone involved.
Guess who’s insurance had to pay for damages to 4 vehicles on top of their own?
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:53 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
It doesn't mean she was either. It just means she decided to swerve.
If she just decided to swerve into oncoming traffic and kill someone she is to blame for their death.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:54 pm to RB10
Thanks. I think we have all invested too much time.
Ultimately, I think it boils down to what you wrote earlier (with which I agree completely):
Ultimately, I think it boils down to what you wrote earlier (with which I agree completely):
quote:
I’ve posted this several times, it’s not either Lacy was at fault OR Funyuns was at fault. It’s Lacy was at fault AND Funyuns was at fault. Do whatever you have to to drive that point home to yourselves.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:55 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
Don't know if it's true but someone said Kyren's insurance already paid out to everyone involved.
I saw that too. I don’t know if it’s true or not so I’m not going to comment.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Thanks. I think we have all invested too much time.
Ultimately, I think it boils down to what you wrote earlier (with which I agree completely):
quote:
I’ve posted this several times, it’s not either Lacy was at fault OR Funyuns was at fault. It’s Lacy was at fault AND Funyuns was at fault. Do whatever you have to to drive that point home to yourselves
Yep. There is only one person here that refuses to admit the funyon lady did anything wrong or shares any of the blame but 1% of people also believe the earth is flat so there's always gonna be somebody.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:58 pm to sgallo3
quote:
If she just decided to swerve into oncoming traffic and kill someone she is to blame for their death
Careful, you are implying that she consciously chose to swerve into oncoming traffic and it wasn’t a reaction to events unfolding.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 3:00 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





