Started By
Message

re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:38 pm to
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6222 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

You are recommended to follow at those distances because they allow you to stop in case of an emergency
I know I'm far behind but what happened doesn't constitute an emergency.

I'll ignore the fact that you said, "you are recommended", because that leaves a lot of grey.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25231 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

I'll ignore the fact that you said, "you are recommended", because that leaves a lot of grey.

There is a grey area but it is still the law.

Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 32:81 establishes the "following too closely" offense, requiring drivers to maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front, and creates a legal presumption that the driver who rear-ends another vehicle is at fault.
Posted by jmh5724
Member since Jan 2012
2649 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 32:81 establishes the "following too closely" offense, requiring drivers to maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front, and creates a legal presumption that the driver who rear-ends another vehicle is at fault.


But she didn’t rear end anyone, so what exactly is your argument? If anything, she swerved the wrong way.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7855 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:43 pm to
"A grand jury was set to hear the case on April 14, 2025."

That's all I could find. Did you see something that said all three charges were still pending?

Hard to believe the DA would seek indictment on those two charges when the DA's report said the evidence didn't support them.

Of course, that wouldn't effect the homicide charge.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45947 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:44 pm to
The lawyer looks bad for a few reasons... heavily cropped and edited videos, contradictions, playing it all out in the media, etc... Plus the locals all know he's slime.

Whatever you choose to believe about funyuns, its a losing game. She gets to say that she was taking evasive action and made the best split second judgement for her own survival that she could. Trying to "prove" that she was too close, when the law doesn't even define what "too close" is, is such a waste of time. Lacy doesn't get to hide behind evasive actions. He willfully violated the law. And all, I mean ALL, of the evidence points to him as the lynchpin of the accident.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45947 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:45 pm to
dont feed the retards.

thanks
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25231 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

But she didn’t rear end anyone, so what exactly is your argument? If anything, she swerved the wrong way.

Because she swerved into another lane to avoid rear ending the truck in her lane.

That does not mean she wasn't following too closely.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7201 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to
That stupid attorney that said the video actually exonerates Lacy insults the intelligence of everyone but him. What a fool.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50658 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

That's all I could find. Did you see something that said all three charges were still pending?

Hard to believe the DA would seek indictment on those two charges when the DA's report said the evidence didn't support them.

Of course, that wouldn't affect the homicide charge.


He was being charged with negligent homicide, hit and run and reckless endangerment.

Leaving the scene was not listed and is what the DA was referring to. It may have been on there originally and removed. I don’t know about that, but the other 3 charges were at least going to a grand jury.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7855 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm to
I first heard that the "no leaving the scene" language was on page 5 of the DA's investigation from Lacy's attorney's latest video.

Then I found it in the link which I posted, which someone else had already posted here.

This has no bearing on whether or not Lacy was culpable in the death.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6222 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Think of it like OSHA rules
Why would I want to think about it like OSHA rules when it's traffic rules that are important?

To fit your narrative?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78151 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

IT DOES NOT MATTER


it absolutely does

typing it like that doesn’t make it not matter
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
45947 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Because she swerved into another lane to avoid rear ending the truck in her lane.

That does not mean she wasn't following too closely.


It doesn't mean she was either. It just means she decided to swerve. Just like the guy in the gold truck... just like Lacy.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25231 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

To fit your narrative?

Im not the DA. It was in the DA's report that the Kia was following too closely/tailgating.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6222 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Guess who’s insurance had to pay for damages to 4 vehicles on top of their own?
Don't know if it's true but someone said Kyren's insurance already paid out to everyone involved.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25231 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:


It doesn't mean she was either. It just means she decided to swerve.

If she just decided to swerve into oncoming traffic and kill someone she is to blame for their death.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7855 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:54 pm to
Thanks. I think we have all invested too much time.

Ultimately, I think it boils down to what you wrote earlier (with which I agree completely):

quote:

I’ve posted this several times, it’s not either Lacy was at fault OR Funyuns was at fault. It’s Lacy was at fault AND Funyuns was at fault. Do whatever you have to to drive that point home to yourselves.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50658 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Don't know if it's true but someone said Kyren's insurance already paid out to everyone involved.


I saw that too. I don’t know if it’s true or not so I’m not going to comment.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25231 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Thanks. I think we have all invested too much time.

Ultimately, I think it boils down to what you wrote earlier (with which I agree completely):

quote:
I’ve posted this several times, it’s not either Lacy was at fault OR Funyuns was at fault. It’s Lacy was at fault AND Funyuns was at fault. Do whatever you have to to drive that point home to yourselves

Yep. There is only one person here that refuses to admit the funyon lady did anything wrong or shares any of the blame but 1% of people also believe the earth is flat so there's always gonna be somebody.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted by jmh5724
Member since Jan 2012
2649 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

If she just decided to swerve into oncoming traffic and kill someone she is to blame for their death


Careful, you are implying that she consciously chose to swerve into oncoming traffic and it wasn’t a reaction to events unfolding.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 3:00 pm
Jump to page
Page First 52 53 54 55 56 ... 60
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 54 of 60Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram