- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's see what the rant thinks about this QB comparison...
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:56 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:56 pm to Antonio Moss
I don't think JJ is a QB that can get it done against the elite D's we will face in our conference such as UF and Bama
I hope I'm wrong
and if I am I'm going to celebrate it just as much as the JJ supporters
I hope I'm wrong
and if I am I'm going to celebrate it just as much as the JJ supporters
2
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:57 pm to deuce985
quote:
Newton threw some decent balls last night. JJ has absolutely HORRIBLE mechanics, especially his release/accuracy.
so style points are included in the stats now?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:58 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
TigerFan55555
Mr. 6-0-5 defensive coordinator himself. Exactly how did MSU execute that defense so finely last night that they were able to contain Mr. All world QB?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:59 pm to Ford Frenzy
quote:
I don't think JJ is a QB that can get it done against the elite D's we will face in our conference such as UF and Bama
You may be completely right. He just our best option by far.
And, on the list of problems with the offense, I don't think he breaks the top two.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 1:59 pm to deuce985
quote:
I'm just saying you have no basis to make a argument MSU has a better D than UNC after one game where they played as a complete unit.
See what I did there? Dude chemistry is fine and all but you need athletes regardless and that is what UNC has. You are beyond stupid for thinking MSU has a better D than UNC 2nd team simply because of chemistry.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:01 pm to Chicot
I love how yall are honestly calling one another an idiot for claiming one D (MSU or UNC-2nd team) is better......there has been one game and there is no way to tell.
I would like to think that MSU D would be better in week 1, but UNC might be the better D in week 4 or so even if they are still playing their backups......Time will tell
I would like to think that MSU D would be better in week 1, but UNC might be the better D in week 4 or so even if they are still playing their backups......Time will tell
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:03 pm to More beer please
Really? Then why hasn't LSU been ranked so highly with all our athletes the past two years?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:03 pm to Roaad
quote:
I like JJ and all. . .but Newton>>>JJ
Based on?
#s <JJ. He threw for 58% vs some semblance of competition. Just the rushing upside?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:05 pm to deuce985
quote:
Really? Then why hasn't LSU been ranked so highly with all our athletes the past two years?
WTF are you talking about? LSU's previous defensive ranking has nothing to do with this arguement?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:07 pm to More beer please
According to you, you need athletes. LSU has athletes so why have been so low in most categories on defense? What is LSU's problem?
I'm making a point, chemistry is more important than you think it is, not just athletes/talent. That is why you can't say UNC has a better defense than MSU after one game. Not that hard to comprehend.
I'm making a point, chemistry is more important than you think it is, not just athletes/talent. That is why you can't say UNC has a better defense than MSU after one game. Not that hard to comprehend.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:07 pm to More beer please
It was brought up in the SEC Rant that only 6 of Cam's last 20 passes were completed past the line of scrimmage.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:08 pm to MightyYat
quote:MSU has some talent. But to think that UNC's 2nd teamers are better than MSU's starting defense is beyond laughable.
UNC's defense had talent all over the place. Davis has recruited his arse off over there.
Come on guys. . .don't embarrass yourselves here.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:08 pm to deuce985
quote:
What is LSU's problem?
Uhhh idk maybe it was having 2 D coordinators???
quote:
That is why you can't say UNC has a better defense than MSU after one game. Not that hard to comprehend.
So your only reason for saying MSU has a better D than UNC is chemsitry...after one game?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:10 pm to deuce985
quote:
Really? Then why hasn't LSU been ranked so highly with all our athletes the past two years?
we were pretty good last year. 2008 was the scheme.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:11 pm to More beer please
Show me where I said MSU's defense was better than UNC... 
Dude, get some fricking reading comprehension skills, jesus christ.
Dude, get some fricking reading comprehension skills, jesus christ.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:15 pm to deuce985
quote:
Doesn't mean they're better than MSU's defense yet.
quote:
all of a sudden they have a better defense than a team like MSU?
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:16 pm to More beer please
Where in those two quotes did I say MSU was better? Did you lose all your brain cells? Maybe you do need some more beer.
I was making the original point, you have no basis after one game, to make a argument they have a better defense than MSU. But nowhere in there, did I say MSU had a better defense than UNC. Like I said, get some reading comprehension skills.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:19 pm to deuce985
quote:
I was making the original point, you have no basis after one game, to make a argument they have a better defense than MSU
Then how the frick can you make the opposite of that arguement?
quote:
But nowhere in there, did I say MSU had a better defense than UNC
Read the fricking question you said. You are asking if we seriously thought the 2nd team of UNC was better than MSU and then arguing for MSU. That is you stating MSU has a better D whether you actually typed it or not.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:22 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Cam's stats: 11-19 136yds 2TDs 1 INT and Auburn thinks they have one of the best QBs in the world and was named player of the game.
If their belief is based solely on that game, then it's a silly one. My understanding is that they are going on more than just that game, but then I don't know what's in their heads.
quote:
Jefferson's stats: 15-21 151yds 2TDs 1 INT and the LSU fan base has been losing their shite over the "poor" play of the QB.
LSU fans' concerns about Jefferson are not based on that one game, and if you are claiming that there's this huge outcry among LSU fans about how horrible he was in that game, then I'll just leave you to argue with your straw man. He made some mistakes, he made some good plays and the offense was, overall, not impressive against a 2nd string ACC defense.
Posted on 9/10/10 at 2:25 pm to Nuts4LSU
Again, only 6 of Cam's last 20 completions over two games were beyond the line of scrimmage.
And even so, JJ had a higher completion percentage.
Sometime the facts don't lie.
And even so, JJ had a higher completion percentage.
Sometime the facts don't lie.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News