- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/30/11 at 10:03 am to fightingsaint3
for the love of Christ, JJ does NOT have an understanding of the offense
it hasn't even been our offense in the past, how can he have an understanding of it?
it hasn't even been our offense in the past, how can he have an understanding of it?
Posted on 3/30/11 at 10:28 am to Ford Frenzy
Could you imagine the look on mett's face when JJ is trying to teach mett the offense?
Posted on 3/30/11 at 5:05 pm to Ford Frenzy
quote:
it hasn't even been our offense in the past, how can he have an understanding of it?
It's the same offense. Luckily, because we had way too many plays and way too many formations, Krags can take our old offense and cut off all the fat into something he likes without having to install a whole new offense. He's streamlining it.
Posted on 3/30/11 at 6:38 pm to Nearl
quote:
It's the same offense. Luckily, because we had way too many plays and way too many formations, Krags can take our old offense and cut off all the fat into something he likes without having to install a whole new offense. He's streamlining it.
I think this is in the best interest of the team to use the same terminology and most of the formations. Just having someone who thinks 3 plays ahead by setting up one play off of another play that we had previously run is a big part of what this offense needed.
Posted on 3/30/11 at 7:10 pm to ironsides
quote:
Not just the playbook; think about the timing and chemistry developed with these players. He threw 2 Td's in practice. Let's not give him the heisman just yet
Yeah seriously.. and isn't the next paragraph about how JJ had as many TD's?? 2 is not > 2.. I don't see how anyone could fault Les for starting JJ at this point. They are pretty equal.. Just cause you have a yearning for 50 yard TD passes does not mean Mett is the better option..
Posted on 3/31/11 at 4:06 am to Hot Carl
quote:
If we get into a situation like last year though, where we need someone to bail us out, I'd imagine that would be Mett.
Thats quite an imagination you have. I think you meant to say that you hope that it's Mett. Don't confuse what you would like to see with what is most likely to happen. Lee has been in a lot of tight situations in his career and last year, he delivered in clutch situations. Why would you turn to Mett, who is unproven over a guy like Lee in a tight situation?? I just dont get it.
Posted on 3/31/11 at 9:13 am to fightingsaint3
quote:And 90% of it is
Good God I never thought this thread would go on for so long..
a) gibberish
b) false information
c) Rantards arguing with themselves.
Bottom line, JJ IS the starting QB whether you like it or not. Until someone comes along and unseats him, he's it. And there will still be 500 threads over the summer arguing who the starting QB will be...all useless, all a colossal waste of time.
Mett has the opportunity to unseat him, IF he can learn the offense and gel with his teammates. What's so hard to understand about this? J Lee will NOT and will never be LSU's starting QB. He will get to play some but that's about it.
Page 14 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News