- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lees INT in the endzone
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:21 am to OldIowaTiger
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:21 am to OldIowaTiger
but why in the frick is this our best option in that situation?
why even call the play to begin with?
why even call the play to begin with?
This post was edited on 10/4/10 at 10:22 am
1
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:23 am to MJM
Nobody was open on that play at all. Tennessee had it covered completely.
The throw wasn't a very good throw.
The Tennessee linebacker made a GREAT play in coverage.
That's football.
The throw wasn't a very good throw.
The Tennessee linebacker made a GREAT play in coverage.
That's football.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:23 am to RelientAA
Without Lee we wouldnt have been in the game. If he had been playing or at least practicing with the starters and got his timing down I believe we wouldnt have had this ending to talk about.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:24 am to Geaux2Hell
JJ's response if he had thrown the INT: " Yeah I thought my performance on that play was pretty good. I threw the ball pretty good. It just went to the wrong guy... I will be surprised if I don't start next week... I'm pretty good."
At least JL can admit to mistakes.
At least JL can admit to mistakes.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:25 am to Geaux2Hell
quote:
this on Lee or the coaching staff for poor play design??
J. Lee:
Lee has to throw the ball to the outside of his receiver, no matter who it is. It was a bad pass.
Coaches:
Fades should usually go to your bigger receivers to take advantage of their height. (See Justin Hunter over Matheiu) However, we had succesfully run that play with Ridley and Ware other times, however this time it didn't work. Not the best design, but not a terrible call.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:27 am to Geaux2Hell
it was a good call and if you watch the play closely you will see ridely did not do what he was taught to do and that was when the lber/db was beat he should have gotten right behind him cutting off the db's path and going to the ball not fading away from it letting the db regain ground....ball should have been high pointed...personally i think ridley blew it....sheppard would have been the better choice
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:27 am to Suntiger
It doesn't matter, LSU coaches get blased no matter what.
The play calling is vanilla
Why the frick would you throw that to a RB
Why do we run all the time in the redzone
Why the frick do you throw in that instance and risk an INT, just run it
It doesn't matter what you do, if it works its brilliant, if it doesn't you should have done the opposite.
The play calling is vanilla
Why the frick would you throw that to a RB
Why do we run all the time in the redzone
Why the frick do you throw in that instance and risk an INT, just run it
It doesn't matter what you do, if it works its brilliant, if it doesn't you should have done the opposite.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:28 am to GeauxTigersLee
quote:thats what leaders do, they take the blame, however the play was ridleys fault
Lee on the interception:
"On that interception I threw in the end zone, it was all my fault. I was going to Stevan (Ridley) and I threw it short, and the linebacker made a great play."
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:28 am to Pirateship
It would have been a good call if we actually ran the belly flip once in a while. The 1st option should have been randle over the middle
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:29 am to Suntiger
quote:that was not a fade...it was a rail route...when done right the rec runs toward middle of field clearing the area....a lber will cover and take a bad angle...rb runs a rail route
Coaches:
Fades should usually go to your bigger receivers to take advantage of their height. (See Justin Hunter over Matheiu) However, we had succesfully run that play with Ridley and Ware other times, however this time it didn't work. Not the best design, but not a terrible call.
This post was edited on 10/4/10 at 10:30 am
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:29 am to Geaux2Hell
The pass needed to be between Ridley and the sidelines. Ridley catches it or no one does.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:29 am to TigerBait1127
It was a bad throw. Like the first time he had tried it all year in a game...... nevermind
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:30 am to Suntiger
Seriously, I thought the same thing about the height advantage, but I think that the coaches were hoping that the play would be more open. The linebacker made a heck of a play. Jarrett should have thrown it away. Pass was at least on target. Ridley should have broken it up.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:30 am to josh336
quote:
Good playcall, kind of a trick play. Lee should've just thrown it away when it wasn't open.
dis.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:34 am to barry
quote:
Why the frick would you throw that to a RB
B/c wheel routes are thrown to RB's. That play is called in hopes of a defensive breakdown. But, if the LB reads it, then you have to throw the ball where only the RB can make the catch.....outside shoulder. It's actually a pretty conservative play b/c the RB will usually be wide open. But, the QB has to know when to throw it away if the defense reads it. With that said, we don't win the game without Lee.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 10:34 am to clamdip
It didn't lose the game for us, thats what I liked about it. It could have, but it didn't.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News