Started By
Message

re: Lee is fine for the title game

Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29323 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

patience would be to stay in the pocket and go through a progression of reads
Are you certain he has several reads to make? Maybe the plays call for one or two reads. Several times, he's made a read, and if the receiver was covered, he'd pull it down instead of trying to force something that isn't there.

Regardless of whether you agree or disagree, Miles believes JJ gives us the best chance at winning. That's all that matters.
Posted by Larry
Collierville, TN
Member since Jul 2004
5479 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:37 pm to
A few questions then I'll hang up: What would Lee have done differently during GA? Keep in mind he was dependent on the run all year as well.

Can we just not agree that we have 2 mediocre/average quarterbacks and one can run the ball and one can't?

If roles were reversed, where JJ got the early season slate putting up exactly the same number, and was pulled for a returning Lee, would we be having this debate?

Why do we not bitch as much about Ware losing his position despite being undefeated when he lost it, and him doing nothing "wrong"?

And the ULTIMATE QUESTION....why does JL "deserve it" more than JJ?
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 2:39 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Does Lee do anything wrong?


Commenting about jj's faults =! saying Lee has none.

You fanbois have to give this schtick up, it's getting really really old.

Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8883 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:40 pm to
It is amazing how the morons who think JJ hung the moon try to pretend like JL played the first 8 games like he played in 08. It is funny how over the last four games (and all of last year) the overwhelming theme is "LSU wins despite QB play," don't recall hearing that through the first eight games.

I think JL was the better QB last year following the UT and UF games, and I think, as a full body of work, he has shown to be the better QB this year. Les doesn't like to throw the ball, so he is going to play the guy that is a stronger runner; however, based on production this year, I think it is a mistake to exclusively play JJ. I'm a fan, I'm entitled to an opinion, I know that upsets some of you, but get over it.
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27925 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:41 pm to
Finebaum is asking Danny Sheridan about it right now.

Apparently he ran with the story.
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8883 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

What would Lee have done differently during GA? Keep in mind he was dependent on the run all year as well.

Can we just not agree that we have 2 mediocre/average quarterbacks and one can run the ball and one can't?

If roles were reversed, where JJ got the early season slate putting up exactly the same number, and was pulled for a returning Lee, would we be having this debate?

Why do we not bitch as much about Ware losing his position despite being undefeated when he lost it, and him doing nothing "wrong"?

And the ULTIMATE QUESTION....why does JL "deserve it" more than JJ?


1. JL gets the ball out faster and opens up the slip screen and quick slants, which will help slow down a blitz.

2. Agree both should be playing, but putting all the marbles behind JJ scares me to death. Just because he doesn't throw picks doesn't mean he doesn't make poor decisions.

3. We had this debate last year when in at least two games JL came in and cleaned up JJ's mess (UF and UT), so yes.

4. Ware has lost time to players that are CLEARLY out performing him. 5/15 for 30 yds by JJ is not out performing JL.

5. JL earned the opportunity to be on the field through the first 8 games. JJ threw 9 picks last season and he never lost substantial playing time. JL has earned the right to get snaps.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 2:45 pm
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6881 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

I was being sarcastic


I sensed that. But I think to Miles it is obvious (in his eyes) who the best player is. Otherwise, I'm not sure why Lee wouldn't play, at all.

Point being- I'm not sure I think its as obvious as Miles thinks it is. I know I'm a hack and he's a $4 million a year coach- just my opinion.

I don't think one QB is clearly better than the other.
Posted by Larry
Collierville, TN
Member since Jul 2004
5479 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

You fanbois have to give this schtick up, it's getting really really old




I am not a "fanboi" of anything but LSU football and WHOEVER is the starting QB. Why do we have to choose QBs and please answer the question about "deserving it more" i would love to hear your response.
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6881 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

It is amazing how the morons who think JJ hung the moon try to pretend like JL played the first 8 games like he played in 08. It is funny how over the last four games (and all of last year) the overwhelming theme is "LSU wins despite QB play," don't recall hearing that through the first eight games.

I think JL was the better QB last year following the UT and UF games, and I think, as a full body of work, he has shown to be the better QB this year. Les doesn't like to throw the ball, so he is going to play the guy that is a stronger runner; however, based on production this year, I think it is a mistake to exclusively play JJ. I'm a fan, I'm entitled to an opinion, I know that upsets some of you, but get over it.


Pretty well said.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Larry


bad reference first off.

Secondly, the poster you responded to was commenting about JJ's faults.

You then say....

"Well I guess Lee is perfect then" or something equally inane.


It's pathetic. Discussing JJ doesn't have anything to do with Lee, until you made it so. That's sad, but it's even more pathetic you cant even grasp the absurdity of your comment.
Posted by Tyger1919
Pineville
Member since Sep 2009
1020 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Can we just not agree that we have 2 mediocre/average quarterbacks and one can run the ball and one can't?


This i agree with, and one can pass and one cant. Im not for one QB over the other. I think the 2 QB systems is best for this team.

quote:

Why do we not bitch as much about Ware losing his position despite being undefeated when he lost it, and him doing nothing "wrong"?


Completely different. His "backups" have played extremely well. You can say the same for JJ or JL for that matter.
Posted by MandevilleLSUTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
6881 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Why do we not bitch as much about Ware losing his position despite being undefeated when he lost it, and him doing nothing "wrong"?


Because you don't see a change in performance at that position, while some see a change in the performance at the QB position.
Posted by msully
Nashville
Member since Aug 2011
1078 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:45 pm to
and for what ? Leading the gang to the parking Lot !
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
60874 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:46 pm to
I love these threads.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14647 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Can we just not agree that we have 2 mediocre/average quarterbacks and one can run the ball and one can't?




This i agree with, and one can pass and one cant. Im not for one QB over the other. I think the 2 QB systems is best for this team.
I'll also agree - and add that against a defense like Bama's, we're better off with a running quarterback than a passing one. Isn't the entire point of this to beat Bama again? Or would y'all rather worry about who gets the most pats on the back?
Posted by Tyger1919
Pineville
Member since Sep 2009
1020 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

I'll also agree - and add that against a defense like Bama's, we're better off with a running quarterback than a passing one. Isn't the entire point of this to beat Bama again? Or would y'all rather worry about who gets the most pats on the back?


Im with you on this. JJ needs to be the QB against bama, I think Lee should have came in against GA and gotten more pt against WKU.
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36486 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:55 pm to
You are such a cocksucker

If there is anyone in this thread that is a fanboy it's your bitch arse
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
16490 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I am not a "fanboi" of anything but LSU football and WHOEVER is the starting QB. Why do we have to choose QBs and please answer the question about "deserving it more" i would love to hear your response.


This describes most rational fans. There are two guys on this site who have taken their "fanboiness" to a level that is ridiculous. That clown is one of the two.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

That clown is one of the two.


all who do not agree with your worthless opinion are clowns?

odd....wanna bump some of your other JL's gonna be ineligible threads?
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
16490 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

all who do not agree with your worthless opinion are clowns?

odd....wanna bump some of your other JL's gonna be ineligible threads?


No you are a clown because of the constant drumbeat of posts about Lee and Jefferson. Over and Over and Over.

I don't have a clue what Lee's status is gonna be. I never once said Lee was gonna be ineligible.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram