- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kam Williams to Kentucky
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:25 pm to LSUTIGGERS22
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:25 pm to LSUTIGGERS22
quote:
Wade offered him a $100,000 to go to McNeese. Check your sources. Mine is the basketball Coach at LCA
Mine was the list of offers extended to him as listed by ON3. I could ask his dad but I try not to ask people I know about that sort of thing and I don't know his dad well enough to feel comfortable asking that anyway.
You know Jacob? I wonder if we might know each other or more likely you may know one of my two younger kids, they both graduated from LCA and LSU.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:25 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Where would you encourage your son to go play?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:26 pm to jamarr
quote:quote:
It is rarely solely about the money
players say that and then go where the money is, most of the time.
If there is a big enough difference. The key in what I said is solely. Kids want to win and they want exposure if they have professional aspirations.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:29 pm to drizztiger
Look guys, I wanna believe like you guys do that increases NIL is gonna help, and I get that losing out to Unc , Duke or Kentucky is nothing to be ashamed of, but explain to me how we are suppose to get competitive players when the only high caliber ones are going to better schools? It’s no different from last year. The problem seems to be identifying players that fit the system rather than the money. I’d rather us hire an assistant or consultant to help identify what we need rather gamble on a guy that ya hope fits, if that’s even a thing lmao. Convince me how a big NIL is gonna change the caliber of player we get plz, I’m just not seeing it, but I wanna believe
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:39 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Again, it was speculating on a hypothetical
correct. you said
quote:
I'd say with a certain degree of belief that if LSU offered 10-15% more in NIL than Kentucky, he still would have chosen UK.
what "certain level of belief"? somewhere around totally clueless to baseless speculation? what does that mean?
you don't know this person. you don't know the priorities. I read the same article you did, he wanted to sign with KY before someone else took that spot.
for the foreseeable future LSU will lose players to blue bloods. they have more money and prestige. but I dunno if they are gonna pass up an extra 100K to do so. I don't have "a certain level of belief" about it, whatever that means.
this whole thread is stupid. you are trying to be critical of McMahon for losing a player to Kentucky. everyone loses players to Kentucky.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:50 pm to jamarr
quote:
I'd say with a certain degree of belief that if LSU offered 10-15% more in NIL than Kentucky, he still would have chosen UK.
quote:Jesus dude.
what "certain level of belief"? somewhere around totally clueless to baseless speculation? what does that mean?
you don't know this person. you don't know the priorities. I read the same article you did, he wanted to sign with KY before someone else took that spot.
for the foreseeable future LSU will lose players to blue bloods. they have more money and prestige. but I dunno if they are gonna pass up an extra 100K to do so. I don't have "a certain level of belief" about it, whatever that means.
this whole thread is stupid. you are trying to be critical of McMahon for losing a player to Kentucky. everyone loses players to Kentucky.
I didn't say we offered more. I said if the hypothetical scenario existed that we offered more, that I believe he still would have chosen Kentucky due to other factors more important than 10-15% more in NIL.
It's not that difficult to comprehend. Or shouldn't be.
And I am not being critical of CoachMc for losing out on a potential transfer. I am critical over CoachMc due to his coaching and the state of the program.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:56 pm to drizztiger
Funny watching the same people who said more money is going to get the best recruits now say “oh well we’re not gonna get the best players because the blue bloods will” after they argued against that very idea for weeks.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:57 pm to Madking
quote:
people who said more money is going to get the best recruits
nobody said that
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:00 pm to Madking
Yup, money has incentive but the root of the problem is identifying players when ya don’t have a system.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:05 pm to Madking
quote:
Funny watching the same people who said more money is going to get the best recruits now say “oh well we’re not gonna get the best players because the blue bloods will” after they argued against that very idea for weeks.
(1) LSU needs to spend more on basketball, specifically NIL for basketball
(2) Money alone is never going to get you the kind of talent you need to make a deep run in the tournament.
Both are true.
This recruiting class and next year's basketball season will likely solidify whether this coach has what it takes to produce a winning program despite the current evidence (overwhelming, some would say) to the contrary. I am not particularly hopeful but at least other coaches will see LSU has addressed at least one of the things that may cause hesitation for high-quality coaches coming to LSU.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:08 pm to Madking
quote:
The people who would’ve bitched are ignorant. The basketball people wouldn’t have
I mean, you've continuously cited how highly ranked LSU's recruiting classes were as proof for the level of talent on the roster. Yet McMahon should've signed a dude who was ranked 179 and who's best offers consisted of Seton Hall, Tulane, and ULL? Based off of rankings, Williams would have been the worst recruit McMahon signed out of high school in his 3.5 years at LSU. Acting like not getting this kid out of high school is some slight on McMahon is just dumb
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:11 pm to The Shaqtus
I’ve talked about building a foundation to your roster with local players ad nauseam on this board for years.
This post was edited on 3/28/25 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:11 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
This thread is like Mississippi State football complaining Alabama got a transfer from another school over them. It's stupid.
Terrible take by the pirate king….arent Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee, and Florida all more talented than Kentucky? How did that happen? I thought that wasn’t allowed since Kentucky is a better program historically?
All the McLosers have really beta takes…
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:16 pm to Madking
quote:
I’ve talked about building a foundation to your roster with local players
there is not enough talent in this state
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:17 pm to Madking
quote:
I’ve talked about building a foundation to your roster with local players ad nauseam on this board for years.
That's all fine and good, but what does geography have to do with any of this?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:29 pm to The Shaqtus
What do you mean? Are you just going to keep moving the goal post and jumping around every time one of your accusations is proven false?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:31 pm to The Shaqtus
My thoughts on the foundation theory, First off, many on here say that ya only need 8-9 players to compete, so offering the top two players can’t hurt right? If they happen to hit iits lagniappe. Second, at least it gives some push back to the teams like Baylor, Houston, A and M who often times grab one out of Louisiana, granite they are niche players who fit their system. Third, there are a few schools that put out a really good player every few years, so maybe it opens up the possibility of building a connection with those coaches who could possibly steer them our way. This theory only holds true if ya believe that ya only need 7-8 good players to be competitive on a 14 man roster. Btw, it’s just a theory
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:33 pm to LSUTIGGERS22
Until this team is a contender, we aren’t getting top prospects if the money is even close. We will have to severely overpay
Popular
Back to top



1



