- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justin McMillan
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:16 pm to TabasgeauxHD
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:16 pm to TabasgeauxHD
Why is he playing and still on our team with 2 freshman ahead of him?
1
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:19 pm to QJenk
quote:I was hoping they were getting there. I'm all for it, even if he turns out to not be the most efficient (just don't turn it over in the redzone!)
I'm ok with it. Many offenses bring in another qb at times to open up the playbook maybe and give different looks to the defense. As long as Mcmillan is proficient enough that the defense has to atleast respect him passing the ball. I'm for it.
Was something up with Etling? Why one play? Why that point in the game? It's the timing of it I couldn't figure out. I'm assuming I was missing something. I've always been for sending in the backup for 2-4 plays when you see something you need to plan with your starter QB. Better than calling a timeout and then 'surprising' somebody because you do it 2 times a year.
quote:yep. preferably series. At worst multiple play packages (with the first play... every fricking time... being a safe pass).
But if he will only be brought in just so he can run it everytime. That will not work and it will be stopped easily everytime.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:43 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
Canada’s gone rogue
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:45 pm to TabasgeauxHD
quote:
Initial thoughts when y'all saw him in the game for a play?
About time someone wised up.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:46 pm to dred24
To provide four years of depth at QB.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 6:48 pm to LSUstephen17
quote:
Why is he playing and still on our team with 2 freshman ahead of him?
Because Brennan isn't nearly ready yet and if I'm not mistaken, is still eligible to redshirt this year (though I'm not 100% sure how that rule works).
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:00 pm to TabasgeauxHD
I wish the package was for Narcisse. I understand them trying to let his injuries heal, though. Plenty to look forward to with Brennan and Narcisse. I really believe our future will be a 2 QB system until we can hit on a true dual threat.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:03 pm to AshLSU
quote:not sure either, but I think there was a rule change proposal that would allow a player to play in 4 games and still be able to redshirt but it either didn't pass or wasn't instituted.
Because Brennan isn't nearly ready yet and if I'm not mistaken, is still eligible to redshirt this year (though I'm not 100% sure how that rule works).
So barring a medical redshirt exemption (god forbid), Brennan's is burned.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:04 pm to bah humbug
Damarkus Lodge. Went to ole miss.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:07 pm to Petroleum Adam
McMillan is a stud. He's not being utilized effectively by the Tigers, and it scares me to contemplate why not.
I was hoping he would become our starting QB last year after Harris was benched. I see a LOT of upside in McMillan.
I was hoping he would become our starting QB last year after Harris was benched. I see a LOT of upside in McMillan.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:25 pm to semjase
Offered in June. Committed in June. Nice try
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:33 pm to DRock88
When O was the interim coach, he said he prefered a Pro Style QB. Right after he got the head coaching job he was asked the same question. This time he said he prefered a dual threat. This tells me that O's boss wants a dual threat QB. I made a post on the Eleventh which dealt with Brennan's future...I was clobbered for it. My thoughts were, if the Tigers struggle and a dual threat QB is put in, Brennan could become a situational QB, and he might look for a better fit elsewhere. Just so you know...I don't like dual threat qb's and I am a big fan of Brennan. I think there will be more plays for McMillan going forward.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 8:29 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News