- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:43 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
100% goal tending
No, I just watched it in slow motion. Ball hit the rim and whoever it was that was in your words "100 goal tending" hit it to the glass and it bounced off there into the net for the 2 points.
Even Dickie and friend said it wasn't goal tending after they watched the replay.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:43 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
I'm interpreting "to vibrate when" to mean: the goal was still vibrating when the ball got to the goal.
I interpret it to be causing the vibration after the ball touches the backboard or is on the cylinder.
How many times have we see guys whiff on reverse layups only to catch the backboard? And how many times do they call goaltending?
ETA - which goes back to my point about Kentucky fans bitching - arguing the letter of the rule is asinine when the spirit of the rule and how it's interpreted in real games is completely different.
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:44 pm to slackster
quote:
Oh, the rule that requires the ball to be on the backboard or within the cylinder to be a violation? That rule?
Yes. The rule that was violated on that shot. That one.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:49 pm to slackster
So just to clarify, you’re interpreting the rule as the goal has to begin to vibrate simultaneously with the ball touching the backboard/rim, but if it the vibration was caused before the ball hit the backboard/rim, it’s legal?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:50 pm to slackster
quote:
Tell me which rule was violated?
quote:
5. Causes the basket or backboard to vibrate when the ball is on or within the basket or the backboard and/or is on or in the cylinder.
pass the popcorn bitch.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:53 pm to geauxjo
quote:
Yes. The rule that was violated on that shot. That one.
It's like everyone just ignores the second part of that rule...
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:55 pm to Rebel
quote:
5. Causes the basket or backboard to vibrate when the ball is on or within the basket or the backboard and/or is on or in the cylinder.
If you cause it to vibrate before the ball hits the backboard, no violation occurred. Thats the way it's officiated every day across all leagues.
I'm all for rubbing it in Kentucky's face, but this whole thread is dumb.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:58 pm to TabledTiger
It was a questionable call but not reviewable. I'll take it.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:58 pm to slackster
quote:
If you cause it to vibrate before the ball hits the backboard, no violation occurred. Thats the way it's officiated every day across all leagues.
So you hit the rim and backboard while the ball is on the way to the goal and the backboard and goal are still moving when the ball contacts the backboard and rim and you're position is it is not interference?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:58 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
was a questionable call but not reviewable. I'll take it.
Damn right. LSU was the better team, that's undeniable.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:00 pm to TabledTiger
Post of the year...
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:01 pm to slackster
quote:
If you cause it to vibrate before the ball hits the backboard, no violation occurred. Thats the way it's officiated every day across all leagues.
Dude. Are you even watching the video? He hit the backboard as the ball came in contact with the board. Simultaneous. I’m not sure why you refuse to admit this was the case. It’s very clear from the replay.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:02 pm to slackster
I think you’ll find the reason everyone is arguing about interference is the same reason you’re contending we don’t argue about it. I agree the spirit of the rule isn’t broken, but when the letter of the rule is being argued all over social media and ESPN, people respond in kind. That’s why LSU is dissecting the letter of the interference rule, just as ESPN is dissecting the letter of the goaltending rule.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:05 pm to slackster
quote:How is this goaltending or interference? (Asking for a friend). Replay: LINK
Just to Clarify.....THIS IS GOALTENDING
"Violations- Goaltending. (Rule 9-17.5). When the ball contacts the backboard and any part of the ball is above the rim on a field goal attempt, it is considered to be on its downward flight. In such case, it is goaltending when the ball is touched by a player as long as it has a possibility of entering the basket."
"In basketball, basket interference is the violation of (a) touching the ball or any part of the basket while the ball is on the rim of the basket, (b) touching the ball when it is within the cylinder extending upwards from the rim, (c) reaching up through the basket from below and touching the ball, whether it is inside or outside the cylinder, or (d) pulling down on the rim of the basket so that it contacts the ball before returning to its original position."
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:09 pm to tigerpawl
When Bigby-Williams tipped the ball in, it had hit the rim and was going up, not into the net.
Not goaltending.
Not goaltending.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:09 pm to geauxjo
quote:
Dude. Are you even watching the video? He hit the backboard as the ball came in contact with the board. Simultaneous. I’m not sure why you refuse to admit this was the case. It’s very clear from the replay.
I saw the video. I thought the slap was slightly before the ball hits the backboard.
I'd like someone to link to a goaltending call resulting from slapping the backboard before the ball hits the backboard. Hell, I'd like to see a goaltending call from slapping the backboard after the ball hits the backboard. I seriously can't recall it happening unless the ball or rim are hit.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:11 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:It never left the cylinder. We got lucky. It happens.
When Bigby-Williams tipped the ball in, it had hit the rim and was going up, not into the net.
Not goaltending.
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:14 pm to slackster
quote:
I'd like someone to link to a goaltending call resulting from slapping the backboard before the ball hits the backboard. Hell, I'd like to see a goaltending call from slapping the backboard after the ball hits the backboard. I seriously can't recall it happening unless the ball or rim are hit.
I’m glad no calls were made. Let em play. Ball game Tigers.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 10:15 pm to tigerpawl
Unfortunately you don’t show the side view where the ball is actually partially below the rim and falling away.
Page 6 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News