Started By
Message

re: Jordy Culotta bringing info

Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:02 am to
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9070 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Again, if LSU denied him the ability to have his lawyer there, that is unfair & unethical.

If the meeting didn’t happen because Wade wouldn’t show up without knowing what they were going to ask, that is a separate issue that is on the Wade camp.


It is reported LSU denied both.

I would have a problem with either not being accepted based on the circumstances of the subpoena if I were Wade.

Posted by Leon the pro
318
Member since Jul 2014
616 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:03 am to
We need a bunch of guys to dress up like purple and gold clowns with t-shirts that read “Member- LSU board of supervisors” and show up at the games in the sec tournament.??
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66678 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:03 am to
The board wanted a quick ambush and execution because they knew once the info came out they’d look worse.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288553 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Agreed. However, ambushing an otherwise stellar employee is not a procedure.




I wouldnt consider not disclosing the questions an ambush, but that is just how I see it.

Wade has already lied to them once about the matter after the first leak came out. Then got caught again on the wiretap, talking to the same dude from the first time. Stellar coach who's done a great job, but not exactly a stellar employee. They have reason to be upset with him. Wade has every reason to be defensive. I get it, I understand it. I do.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:07 am to
The fact the our BOS, which has practicing attorneys as members, requested a formal meeting WITH their own legal representation present before WW’s testimony in a federal trial is stunning.

1) They knew he couldn’t address the wiretapped calls in any way.
2) They knew he would require an attorney present for the meeting to prevent legal issues with his testimony
3) Information provided to them during this meeting could constitute a risk for LSU, the BOS and/or individual members of the BOS

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66678 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:11 am to
Is there really any truth to this rumor that Wade lied to anybody after the first tapes were released? It isn’t keeping with the fact that he isn’t supposed to be discussing the case and I’ve never seen any hard evidence that this happened only post from Rant people.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 11:11 am
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288553 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:13 am to
quote:

1) They knew he couldn’t address the wiretapped calls in any way.



Will Wade doesn't even know what is on the wiretapped calls.


Considering what LSU has to lose, to say he couldnt discuss Javonte Smart's recruitment and possible recruiting violation, an LSU basketball player, with LSU admins, is silly. It's already public knowledge and is not what is being investigated to begin with.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9070 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Wade has already lied to them once about the matter after the first leak came out.


What was the lie? Link to this info please.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9070 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

to say he couldnt discuss Javonte Smart's recruitment and possible recruiting violation


More assumptions on your part.

Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288553 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

School officials were somewhat blindsided by the Yahoo! report, multiple sources say. University leaders spoke to Wade about the matter earlier this year following initial reports linking him to the FBI probe, and he assured them that what had already been made public represented the full extent of his involvement.



LINK
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:


Considering what LSU has to lose, to say he couldnt discuss Javonte Smart's recruitment and possible recruiting violation, an LSU basketball player, with LSU admins, is silly. It's already public knowledge and is not what is being investigated to begin with.




I’m sorry, but I’ve got substantial 1st hand experience in these types of situations. Do you?

When legal proceedings are involved, typical Human Resource, Risk Management, Performance Plans, etc can no longer proceed in typical order.

LSU Admins absolutely should have questioned the recruitment of Smart. How do you know that’s all they were going to ask? How did WW know this is all they were going to ask? They wouldn’t provide a list of questions. That list could have helped WW and his attorney determine how to provide that info without jeopardizing the ongoing legal process or his future testimony.

Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27398 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:20 am to
quote:

1) They knew he couldn’t address the wiretapped calls in any way.
2) They knew he would require an attorney present for the meeting to prevent legal issues with his testimony
3) Information provided to them during this meeting could constitute a risk for LSU, the BOS and/or individual members of the BOS




And this is the brain trust in charge at LSU (I assume because I really don't know who is charge of all this shite anymore).
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26327 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:21 am to
Can we get a ban on lester earl at the same time we fire king! His continued pressing on a issue that is black and white is ridiculous!

The fact that CWW can't discuss certain things and would be irresponsible of him to me without his lawyer is obvious to anyone with a working brain. You don't risk jail time just to give a couple of clowns a heads up on a couple of questions they have.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66678 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:22 am to
So he did tell them the wiretaps were the only thing going on. That’s not lying to them it’s the opposite. It’s also a yahoo report so you have to be extra careful about believing it and really pick apart the exact words they’re using. I don’t see anything about Wade lying in there.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 11:22 am
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288553 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

How do you know that’s all they were going to ask? How did WW know this is all they were going to ask? They wouldn’t provide a list of questions.


because LSU has no interest in anything related to the case other than LSU. Why would they?

If you dont like the question, dont answer it


quote:

and his attorney determine how to provide that info without jeopardizing the ongoing legal process or his future testimony.



please give me an example of something Will Wade as a witness who doesnt even know whats on the wiretap, could say that would jeopardize his future testimony.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288553 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:28 am to
quote:

So he did tell them the wiretaps were the only thing going on



the 1st taps only became public knowledge because they were leaked too. Wade was not forthcoming with that information.

He told LSU that was the extent of it. Regardless of how Yahoo writes it, it is clear that there was indeed more shady business between Wade and Dawkins.


Did Wade gamble and tell them nothing else would come out in hopes that didn't have other conversations on tape? Yeah, probably. He lost that one.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66678 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:32 am to
But did he tell them the wiretaps were the extent of it or that the singular leaked quote was the extent of it? Why would he say an amended quote was the end of it? I think he meant the wiretaps the FBI had come to LSU to discuss with Wade was the only thing there which was true. Nobody from LSU has said Wade lied that’s an assumption people are making to justify what happened on Friday.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 11:36 am
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66678 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:34 am to
“Did Wade gamble and tell them nothing else would come out in hopes that didn't have other conversations on tape? Yeah, probably. He lost that one.”

I would think that after today you’d stop making assumptions like this.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 11:35 am
Posted by lsutiger2010
Member since Aug 2008
14790 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:34 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9070 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 11:34 am to
Still no evidence of a lie. Just reporters trying to paint it that way.
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16 17 18 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram