- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there evidence of batters improving significantly under Jay Johnson?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 2:56 pm to im4LSU
Posted on 4/22/25 at 2:56 pm to im4LSU
quote:
Man, you really are dumb
What’s really impressive is that he is so dumb he manages to convince himself he is right. Feels like a new level of dumb.
99.9% chance every room he enters in real life, he is the dumbest individual in the room.
1
Posted on 4/22/25 at 3:01 pm to FredbullTN
He's magician 2 ....i would bet anything on that.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 5:08 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
Earlier you said Stanfield didn’t take a spot because Curiel was never playing center.
Not what I said
You’re forcing a dumb argument. It’s quite simple. Larson would be my 5th OF. I’d have Curiel at CF, Pearson or Stanny in LF pending pitcher/hot hand and Jake in RF.
Does that spell it out for you
quote:
Stanfield took an outfield spot from Larson
Since Larson would be my fifth OF, this is mathematically false. Larson would be a Lh DH for me. He’s a clumsy runner who will unlikely ever be an asset in the OF covering ground.
quote:
I’m not going to address the factually inaccurate statement that the .380 hitter who leads the conference in doubles offers little offensive upside.
Dead pull hitter with good hands but limited skill.
By this logic, you’re saying Jones, Milam et al are not good because they factually have horrible BAs in conference?
This post was edited on 4/22/25 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 4/22/25 at 5:09 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
It’s literally just posting data to prove you wrong, again.
How’s the data on Jones, Milam, Larson and the guys you declared to be “stars”?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 5:11 pm to lsu777
quote:
.i used to the burrow comparison
Posted on 4/22/25 at 6:38 pm to PurpleSingularity
So you’re just a casual fan huh?
Just stick to that pal.
Just stick to that pal.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 7:46 pm to burreauxxx
I’ll give it to you you have no care what people think about you lol. Cause I’m here to tell you you have the worst takes I’ve ever heard. You’re literally trying to say Stannys stats don’t mean nothing because he won’t have a mlb career and you’d play someone else that would bat with a lesser average that might make it in the league. Make it make sense pal
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:18 pm to burreauxxx
quote:No. For the sake of this argument, we were eliminating Stanfield from the argument, because I said Stanfield took an outfield spot from Larson. You said he didn't because Larson was never playing center (I never said he was). Stanfield took the spot because he pushed Curiel and Brown to the corner. This pushed Pearson out of the every day lineup and pushed Larson out of the lineup entirely.
You’re forcing a dumb argument. It’s quite simple. Larson would be my 5th OF. I’d have Curiel at CF, Pearson or Stanny in LF pending pitcher/hot hand and Jake in RF.
Does that spell it out for you
quote:Jesus Christ dude. Stanfield is not on the team in this scenario. Stanfield took the spot from Larson. That's the whole point of this exercise.
Since Larson would be my fifth OF, this is mathematically false. Larson would be a Lh DH for me. He’s a clumsy runner who will unlikely ever be an asset in the OF covering ground.
quote:You have changed your argument from "pop up hitter who shouldn't get at bats" to "Dead pull hitter with good hands but limited skill."
Dead pull hitter with good hands but limited skill.
It took you 2 months of him hitting the ball extremely well for you to come to that evaluation. This is why no one takes you seriously.
quote:No. They have all proven they can hit in conference. Milam has horrendous batted ball luck and Jones is slumping.
By this logic, you’re saying Jones, Milam et al are not good because they factually have horrible BAs in conference?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:19 pm to Geaux wylder
quote:I engage when I'm bored and have time. It's fun shoving him into a locker.
Cause I’m here to tell you you have the worst takes I’ve ever heard.
Best part is everyone on the board can see it except for him.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:23 pm to burreauxxx
quote:
How’s the data on Jones, Milam, Larson and the guys you declared to be “stars”?
Guys have hit a slump the past couple of weeks which happens all of the time. Pretty sure that has widely been acknowledged by everyone so not sure what you’re arguing about lol. With all of that we’re still 3rd in the SEC in batting average.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:26 pm to PP7 for heisman
If he’s not a troll he is clueless about baseball lol. You can’t make up some of the takes he has there so bad.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News