- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is there any reason to go power I w/o Scott at fullback?
Posted on 9/14/09 at 9:27 am
Posted on 9/14/09 at 9:27 am
Dugas is horrible. I don't know what the coaches saw from him in fall camp. A career tailback in Charles Scott is 10x the better blocker. Scott also gives you a potent offensive threat out of the FB position.
KW and CS should be permanent fixtures in the power I.
KW and CS should be permanent fixtures in the power I.
1
Posted on 9/14/09 at 9:39 am to skullhawk
I agree with the CS/KW Power I!
Posted on 9/14/09 at 9:48 am to tcantrelle42
Figured we would see It this season. I'm loving it. KW looks like he has it on his mind this season
Posted on 9/14/09 at 11:32 am to Guava Jelly
I love the Scott/KW backfield. Scott hasn't been utilized in the passing game that much, but has decent hands. He had an awesome middle screen in the 2007 BCS NC Game. I would love to see the coaches put him in that Hester role catching flares and the occasional go route up the sideline. He and KW would both be nightmares for an LB to cover. Put Toliver, Lafell, and Dickson out there at the WR and TE spots and there is a LOT of firepower and options for the offense. Then put RS back there in place of KW in spots. I know it was Jimbo running the show then, but this was a very effective formation for us in 2006. I would love to see more of it with our current lineup.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News