- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is LSU football in the 2000s considered a dynasty?
Posted on 4/12/10 at 2:55 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Posted on 4/12/10 at 2:55 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:No. It would've been if Les Miles hadn't crapped all over the last two years. But sadly, a decade is measured by all 10 years.
Is LSU football in the 2000s considered a dynasty?
0
Posted on 4/12/10 at 2:57 pm to Mayhawman
quote:Because Sammich appeared. He has a bot in his browser software that triggers him anytime that Saban's name is mentioned.
The thread was LSU Football and I'm not sure how this became about Tricky Nicky.
Posted on 4/12/10 at 5:02 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
I'm new but I read a post or two on this thread talking about how texsucks is close to being a 2000 decade dynasty. BULL SH$T!!! I maybe an OU SOONER HOMER but give me a freakin break. Here's the facts on texsucks for the decade the OP is refering to, 1 NC in 2 tries, 2 conference championships outa 10 at bats (haha), 4 wins over their foes (OU) on the field in the RRR = KRAP. Now my SOONERS are NO dynasty either BUT were a hellofalot closer than the whorns..... 1 NC in 4 tries, 6 conference championships outa 10, 6 wins over their foes on the field in the RRR = conference dynasty and a hellofalot more national importance than the freakin whorns produced throughout the decade. I like LSU and pull for them in the SEC but I can't let anyone think that ut has anything to offer nationally or in their own freakin conference in the decade the OP was refering to. tuck fexass!
The Dove
The Dove
Posted on 4/12/10 at 5:24 pm to The Dove
quote:
I'm new but I read a post or two on this thread talking about how texsucks is close to being a 2000 decade dynasty. BULL SH$T!!! I maybe an OU SOONER HOMER but give me a freakin break
No, you're Texas right, wasn't a dynasty. The lack of championships is proof enough. Though, to be fair, since 2000, his winning % is slightly better than Stoops (110-21 vs. 110-24). Brown has also finished ranked every year since 2000 and Stopps missed being ranked last year. Stoops's teams have averaged a finishing rank of 7.1 while Brown's teams have averaged 7.0 (slightly better). If you take away Brown's worst finish in the last 10 years (as I had to do with Stoops becuase he was unranked last year), Brown's teams have finished with an average ranking of 6.3. The only thing that seperates the two is conference titles, of which Oklahoma has 6 and Texas 2.
This post was edited on 4/12/10 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 4/12/10 at 7:37 pm to foshizzle
quote:
Is LSU football in the 2000s considered a dynasty?
Not a dynasty, but at a similar level as OSU, USC, Texas and OU.
These teams dont have 2 BCS trophys. Only Fla and LSU hold that tier
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News