- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:10 pm to radicalizedtigah
Six more wins and it'll be the best coached LSU team of all time
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:10 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:LOL.
You've claimed more than that though. You also used Bellichick as an example with hIs terrible record on Cleveland. So yes it must be the same
The point was obviously that, QUITE A LOT goes in to determining if a coach is good or not beyond being a fricking 4 year old and saying, "but but but....the won loss column!!!"
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:10 pm to radicalizedtigah
Including the saban error
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:11 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Oh yes. Because W/L is the entire metric for good coaching job!!
In this thread - shorty and powerman think 9-3 capitol one bowl losing season is better than winning the west.
Says the kindergartners
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:11 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The point was obviously that, QUITE A LOT goes in to determining if a coach is good or not beyond being a fricking 4 year old and saying, "but but but....the won loss column!!!"
I’ve said why 2005 was better. You still haven’t said why it wasn’t.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:12 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
LOL
That's how I felt after reading it.
quote:
The point was obviously that, QUITE A LOT goes in to determining if a coach is good or not beyond being a fricking 4 year old and saying, "but but but....the won loss column!!!"
And three point that you can't give up is that 2005 was coached better than 2004 looking at everything.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:12 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You've claimed more than that though. You also used Bellichick as an example with hIs terrible record on Cleveland. So yes it must be the same
Comparing something many years prior to something the year after one has already achieved greatness is just stupid
Were you better at math in 2nd grade or 8th grade?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:12 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
You still haven’t said why it wasn’t.
He will never actually answer it, because there is no answer.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:12 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It’s not one year. It’s a general reference over a period of years. You fricks are weird
Yeah. That's probably the funniest part.
The OP question referred to the ERA. So, even if you said he fricking shite the bed in 2004, you still have to ask...……"is this the best coached team since the Saban ERA...……..which...…...yeah...……..includes 2003
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:12 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
In this thread - shorty and powerman think 9-3 capitol one bowl losing season is better than winning the west.
No, he thinks Saban did a better job with what he had and the strength of opponents than Miles.
You can't quantify it.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:13 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And three point that you can't give up is that 2005 was coached better than 2004 looking at everything.
2005 team had a superior roster lead by an elite QB that wasn't ready in 2004
How do you not understand this?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:13 pm to Powerman
quote:
Comparing something many years prior to something the year after one has already achieved greatness is just stupid
Were you better at math in 2nd grade or 8th grade?
So O was great at ole Miss then. Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That season was shite. Saban had a foot out the door. The team played uninspiring football. How you can think that is better than 2005 ignores reality.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:14 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I’ve said why 2005 was better. You still haven’t said why it wasn’t.
Simple.
Because I know Saban didn't suddenly forget how to coach after 2003 and, I already know...…...and YOU have admitted...…….Saban IS a better coach than Miles.
Saban likely coached the 2004 team in a near identical manner to how he coached the 2003 team.
If you think otherwise, you're a fricking idiot.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, he thinks Saban did a better job with what he had and the strength of opponents than Miles.
You can't quantify it.
Because it's a load of crap
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Oh yes. Because W/L is the entire metric for good coaching job!!
Says the kindergartners
If we go that route, oregeron 2019 might end up better than Saban 2003
They wouldn't really believe it then..
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Saban likely coached the 2004 team in a near identical manner to how he coached the 2003 team.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Meanwhile, Beefense thinks that Saban coached the 2003 team using one approach...…..then, in 2004 said, "frick it, I'm changing how I do things">
No, he thinks Saban did a better job with what he had and the strength of opponents than Miles.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 10:16 pm to BeeFense5
The fact you laughed shows you really have no logical argument for why Saban would have somehow coached differently in 2004 than he did in 2003
Because. Well, that would be fricking weird.
Because. Well, that would be fricking weird.
Page 17 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News