Started By
Message

re: Is Aaron Nola the greatest LSU pitcher of all time?

Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:43 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

The first bbcor bats were probably equivalent or even worse than wood


I've never swung a BBCOR, but a good wooden bat has a ton of pop in the barrel.

From what I saw those early BBCORs did not.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 1:44 pm
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Your right
My right what?
quote:

Velocity isn’t a barometer on pitching ability at all. Solid call.
Hey strawman, is that what I said?
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12353 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:47 pm to
Ben McDonald.
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21318 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I've never swung a BBCOR, but a good wooden bat has a ton of pop in the barrel.

From what I saw those early BBCORs did not.


They were like swinging something made out of lead. Absolutely no pop or give to them. They switched while I was in high school so we went from having the second best era of juiced bats of all time to possibly the worst.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72671 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:48 pm to
THIS THREAD IS AN EPIC FAIL
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Ben had better “stuff”



Ben had a big, flat fastball and thats it. Number 1 pick based on potential and the belief he could be taught to throw a curve for strikes, never really happened. On a bad day Nola has 4 pitches he can throw for strikes.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:49 pm to
Solo Cam doesn’t know what “stuff” means in terms of pitching. That much is obvious.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32637 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 2:56 pm to
You guys are totally right. Ben McDonalds “stuff” was garabage.

Fuching morons.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41915 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Ben had a big, flat fastball and thats it. Number 1 pick based on potential and the belief he could be taught to throw a curve for strikes, never really happened. On a bad day Nola has 4 pitches he can throw for strikes.



So, you think Ben was drafted #1 in MLB draft, won gold for Team USA, Career SO leader at LSU and pitched 7+ seasons, in MLB, with ONE pitch?



I don't even
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 3:03 pm
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

You guys are totally right. Ben McDonalds “stuff” was garabage.

You argue like a liberal. No one has said this.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32637 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

You argue like a liberal. No one has said this
Are you shitting me?

I said Ben McDonald, the #1 overall pick, golden spikes winner, who was called The greatest professional pitching prospect of all time, had great “stuff” aka pitches. And you responded “nope”.

You can go fuch yourself.
Posted by panama city tigerfan
panama city florida
Member since Sep 2003
1259 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:30 pm to
I know not the greatest but always liked Lane Mestepey. Reminded me of Jacob Hester gutsy player
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Are you shitting me?
Nope. I never called him or his stuff garbage. We are having an argument comparing two pitchers. “Stuff” in baseball terms means velocity with movement. Throwing hard, Ben’s MO, does not equate stuff by itself. And in the late 80s, triple digit velocity alone was worth a top 10 pick and Ben could control that fastball. He couldn’t control much else; he admits this. That was his downfall.
quote:

You can go fuch yourself.
Relax, Francis.

All I’m saying is that in terms of “stuff”, Nola is the one who had it. 94 mph with elite control over his fastball and plus curve. His changeup was so so in college but he could show it and it was effective enough.

Ben was great. I’ll never say anything differently. But in a head to head comparison, I’m going with Nola for the reasons above and my first post: I need one win, I’m going with Aaron.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 3:41 pm
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32637 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

And in the late 80s, triple digit velocity alone was worth a top 10 pick
Yeah it is today too. Kevin Gausman says hi.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:42 pm to
Does he? He never hit triple digits at LSU. And that’s certainly not the sole reason he was drafted. Not that Ben was.

ETA: His scouting report “...easy delivery with a fastball that usually sits in the low to mid 90s range; his fastball has been clocked at nearly 100 mph.”
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 3:46 pm
Posted by LSUstephen17
Houston
Member since Aug 2010
13112 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:42 pm to
I’d say Ben
Posted by jgriffith
Paradise Valley, Arizona
Member since Sep 2005
5316 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Ben had better “stuff”


At LSU, yes, Ben had great stuff, and his fastball was mid to upper 90s, so he is 1 and Aaron 1a, again AT LSU..

Ben will tell you he had "command" issues in the pros. Aaron thus far is having a better pro career.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32637 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Does he?
He does.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28401 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:49 pm to
Clay Dirks, hands down. Nobody has ever pitched that well with a a BA level of 0.24 on the mound.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85040 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:49 pm to


That’s not at LSU you moron.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram