- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:27 pm to Sasquatch Smash
My favorite stat of all is LSU is 6-0 in CWS finals and Florida is 0-2.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:28 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Game 1 winners wind up winning the series over 70% of the time.
And Game 1 losers win the series 30% of the time.
Relevance to tonight's game?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:30 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I find the guys slinging insults at others by appealing to the "authority" of their glory days to be simultaneously funny and pathetic
I would guess if the conversation was about law, you would feel like you were much more intellectually superior when arguing with someone who hasnt studied law. (I dont know if you're a lawyer but you seem like one)
Its the same with baseball. Someone who played at a high level for 12 years is going to get frustrated arguing with someone who never played past age 12.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:33 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
It's a message board, man. I have a feeling you'd be be shocked who some of the people on hear actually are. I'm damn certain there are quite a few former players from multiple sports on here. Slinging dirt just makes you look like a never was.
That's great. So, if I happen to be a "never was", I'm apparently unable to comment on, or otherwise have an opinion in respect of, whatever sport it may be that we're discussing in which you may have played?
Again. Appealing to the "authority" of your glory days can be pathetic.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:35 pm to Godfather1
quote:Game 2 winners win the series 78% of the time. That's the big game.
quote:
Game 1 winners wind up winning the series over 70% of the time.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:36 pm to canyon
quote:
71% actually. But then you knew that after the 1,274 times they said it last night.
What they didn't mention or show was the breakdown of how many of those 1st game winners that won the championship went thru their bracket undefeated and had a full/rested pitching staff versus teams that had to fight back from the losers bracket.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:38 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
That's great. So, if I happen to be a "never was", I'm apparently unable to comment on, or otherwise have an opinion in respect of, whatever sport it may be that we're discussing in which you may have played?
Sure, you can have opinion. But when your go to argument revolves around a stat that has nothing to do with actually playing the game, you tip your hand that you have no clue what you're talking about.
This post was edited on 6/27/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:39 pm to chitiger91
quote:
Odds are if you have to dig yourself out of holes vs good competition ur toast. We're toast haha
LSU would be in a hole if they had pitched Poche and lost. They are not in a hole, currently, they are where they need to be: 2 best pitchers rested and needing to win 2.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:43 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
So losing game one in a best of 3 isn't a hole?!?!?!?!
some of you ppl.....
some of you ppl.....Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:49 pm to ibleedprplngld
Think about it. In a similar scenario, OSU laid 13 on our bullpen to our lone homer. We came back to decisively beat them in the second two games and that included dispatching FSU along the way.
I'm not saying that the transitive property applies, but you have to at least like our chances.
I'm not saying that the transitive property applies, but you have to at least like our chances.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 12:55 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
Sure, you can have opinion. But when your go to argument revolves around a stat that has nothing to do with actually playing the game, you tip your hand that you have no clue what you're talking about.
My "go to argument"? If anything, you "experience" guys are just lending credence to the "dumb jock" stereotype. 
Posted on 6/27/17 at 1:14 pm to Scoob
Going through it, it's hard to state one definitive thing although generally it looks like the sweepers had an easier path, less games, etc. 2005, 2007, 2011, 2012, 2013.
2010 USC and 2004 CSF being pretty big exceptions.
There's a million variables but looks like most teams that have swept played a lot less ball than UF has leading up to the final series.
2010 USC and 2004 CSF being pretty big exceptions.
There's a million variables but looks like most teams that have swept played a lot less ball than UF has leading up to the final series.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 1:31 pm to rt3
One game at a time, let's win this one then look to the next game. Odds, pffft.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 3:05 pm to Sir Fury
quote:
Screw statistics.
I think the 71% figure is meaningful, but most of those teams did not start their 5th-6th string pitcher in that first game.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:55 pm to ibleedprplngld
fricking trash thread
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News