- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you had to give a grade on Zach M. performance...
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:03 pm to JBeam
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:03 pm to JBeam
I would say B-. Sadly I watched and thought a little more foot speed would be nice. Then I remembered JJ was gone. LOL
The most alarming things I saw was lack of protection and lack of separation from the WR's. Could be trouble against better teams.
The most alarming things I saw was lack of protection and lack of separation from the WR's. Could be trouble against better teams.
1
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:10 pm to JBeam
Zack did a good job. Being the first game of the season, and the first start for Zach, I give him top marks.
But grading under these circumstances is not really necessary. It was a warm-up game and things looked pretty good for the most part.
But grading under these circumstances is not really necessary. It was a warm-up game and things looked pretty good for the most part.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:29 pm to JBeam
C+, with lots more potential.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:42 pm to cattus
C+
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:43 pm to ShermanTxTiger
We will see when he goes on the road to auburn. 3 home games is perfect.
Last year was brutal.
Last year was brutal.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:48 pm to dreaux
Zach B. Offensive play calling C-
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:25 pm to Lithium
B, people saying he needs to pick up the cb blitz are crazy. The db disguised it perfectly. he showed man, once the snap he blitzed. no one would have picked that up
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:39 pm to JBeam
B
Our total O ranks at #27. I don't think it has ranked that high since 07.
I thought he played pretty good, all things considered.
Our total O ranks at #27. I don't think it has ranked that high since 07.
I thought he played pretty good, all things considered.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:41 pm to JBeam
sounds about right. He's an upgrade from last year, but room for improvement, which I expect.
Posted on 9/5/12 at 9:47 am to fightingtigers98
quote:I will admit the DB did a good job disguising it, but not *that* good. If you watch it again you'll see the WR point to him before the snap and yell something at Mett. If anything, Mett should have taken that as a clue that he has a hot route to that WR and unloaded it quickly. Mett didn't recognize.
B, people saying he needs to pick up the cb blitz are crazy. The db disguised it perfectly. he showed man, once the snap he blitzed. no one would have picked that up
Posted on 9/5/12 at 9:52 am to sunnydaze
quote:
sunnydaze
quote:
Mett is a solid qb like the uga posters said, but y'all were so caught up in the mettsiah bullshite. The hype and expectations, made by our fans, really wasn't fair to the kid IMHO
Spot on!
Posted on 9/5/12 at 9:56 am to JBeam
quote:
I'd have to say B- for his debut.
C+ to B-, probably leaning to your grade because it was his starting debut. He wasn't asked to do as much as he will be, but he also didn't get "A" grade protection, either. He held the ball too long a couple of times (theoretically coachable) and the bad force (easily correctable) and these are the main things keeping his NT grade lower.
This post was edited on 9/5/12 at 10:16 am
Posted on 9/5/12 at 9:56 am to JBeam
Looked like Jefferson/Lee offense to me. C. 
Posted on 9/5/12 at 9:58 am to Touchdowns4LSU
quote:
Looked like Jefferson/Lee offense to me. C.
You don't have a clue as to what you're talking about then
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:00 am to 2007lsuno1
holy shite, i didnt even watch the game and i can do better than some of you tards.
Mett - A.
Why? because i fricking said so. Lets see some of you pussies get your arse out there and lead a top team for the first time on the opening night in tiger stadium. For those of you who blind, Mile's plan was to put ZM in low risk situations and put him in a position to build his confidence, and allow the team to build confidence in him. frick that A shite. Mission accomplished. A+ i say.
Mett - A.
Why? because i fricking said so. Lets see some of you pussies get your arse out there and lead a top team for the first time on the opening night in tiger stadium. For those of you who blind, Mile's plan was to put ZM in low risk situations and put him in a position to build his confidence, and allow the team to build confidence in him. frick that A shite. Mission accomplished. A+ i say.
This post was edited on 9/5/12 at 10:08 am
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:10 am to JBeam
A+ /thread
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:15 am to sunnydaze
quote:
Yea, because mett called all those slants and screens
We ran those because we finally have someone who can execute them.
It was a pleasure watching our receivers catching balls while running.
That wideout screen is harder to throw than many realize.
Posted on 9/5/12 at 10:17 am to TheDoc
quote:
Looked like Jefferson/Lee offense to me. C.
quote:
You don't have a clue as to what you're talking about then
agree
Posted on 9/5/12 at 11:16 am to JBeam
I think the guy did awesome,he's going to be something special for this school! Factor in first game jitters,the pressure put on him to be a superstar right out the box,and finally getting to face a defense with the green light to lay him out (which did),he's going to be fine.
Posted on 9/5/12 at 11:27 am to JBeam
:beatdeadhorse:
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News