- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you don’t think the scheduling is biased, check out next years
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:13 pm to sta4ever
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:13 pm to sta4ever
Little to no bias NOW....in the past ? HELL YES ! And just who is the SEC schedule maker/manipulator....I'll give you one guess who this bias individual leans toward/is an alum of...LOL
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:19 pm to OppositeMan
quote:
OppositeMan

quote:
1. LSU plays a tougher schedule than bama
In one year. What about from 2012-2017? You're factually correct but your fact is pointless and serves no purpose.
quote:
. LSU should reevaluate its scheduling strategy based on this.
Based on one year where we had a higher s.o.s. than Bama we should re evaluate all of our scheduling parameters. Thank God you don't work for the AD.
quote:
Hey...what's your point?
My point is looking at one year of scheduling and saying that we need to re think all of our scheduling is just dumb. We have zero control over us playing UF and Bama playing UT. We then rotate out an East opponent which we also don't really control. So all we can do is control some of our cupcakes/ooc games, which won't matter all that much tbh.
But please continue your yelling at me. This is comical.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:24 pm to OppositeMan
quote:ah, you conveniently cut it off at 2018. If you'd have gone back from 2017 to 2007, you'd see the following Bama regular season OOC opponents:
Look again...swallow your pride... 2018... BAMA
Louisville
Arkansas State
Cajuns
Missouri
Tennessee
Citadel
2019... BAMA
Duke
New Mexico State
South Carolina
Southern Miss
Tennessee
Western Carolina
Florida State
USC
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Va Tech
Michigan
Penn State
Penn State
Va Tech
Clemson
Florida State
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:24 pm to OppositeMan
quote:
Final downvote...no point in doing this with you anymore, man...you're not being honest.
show me where I'm being "dishonest." Sorry I don't fall in to the radical conspiracies like you and others do every year.
quote:
Sometimes you just need to admit when you're wrong. Hopefully you'll learn this one day.
And sometimes you need to look in the mirror when you make comments like this. You should have already learned this.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:25 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
you're sad dude
And you're a coward. Enjoy the fake laughs, coward.
I'm done with you...sorry if I hurt your feelings, you little bitch.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:25 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
ah, you conveniently cut it off at 2018.
Glad you're not arguing. LSU played and plays a tougher schedule than bama in both 2018 and 2019.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:28 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Sometimes you just need to admit when you're wrong. Hopefully you'll learn this one day.
quote:
And sometimes you need to look in the mirror when you make comments like this. You should have already learned this.
You're a little bitch, too, man.
I didn't type a single thing that isn't correct.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:28 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
When the decision was made to make UF LSU's perm and UTenn bama's perm, UTenn's program was far superior to UF's and had been for 75 years. I understand that has changed in the 21st century, but it is schools like Ole Miss, State, UK, Vandy, Carolina, A&M, Mizzou, and Arkansas that like the schedules this way, i.e. with crossdivision perms. It's not because of Bama, Tenn, and UGA that that won't change.
Yes, it's quite hilarious that no one ever complains that Ole Miss' permanent East team is Vanderbilt


Wanna know why no one complains about Ole Miss and the others? Because those programs don't win anything of consequence. But when all logic fails, let's just claim conspiracy in the SEC office
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:31 pm to OppositeMan
quote:
They obviously do. I've been having trouble getting a couple people here to admit that plain as day fact...and it's aggravating seeing these baws be so dishonest.
I won't explain why it matters...this should be plain as day obvious, too. Really, man?
I would say all of this tells us that we probably need to reevaluate our scheduling strategy.
The problem is you are focusing on two seasons. Why only two? What about 2017? How is that any less relevant? Why was it fair that LSU got to play the worst team in the SEC in the rotation and 4-7 Florida as their permanent? Unless you are claiming this bias started this year, you have no argument. The fact that a couple of times Alabama had a weaker schedule does not equate to there being a scheduling conspiracy, sorry.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:31 pm to OppositeMan
quote:
And you're a coward. Enjoy the fake laughs, coward.
I'm done with you...sorry if I hurt your feelings, you little bitch.
quote:
by OppositeMan

Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:33 pm to lsufball19
quote:
The fact that a couple of times Alabama had a weaker schedule does not equate to their being a scheduling conspiracy, sorry.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:34 pm to madddoggydawg
quote:
That doesn't mean he doesn't make sure the permanent opponent format never changes.
LSU is the only program complaining about the permanent cross-division games and it makes us look like losers looking for an easy road. If we had a long standing rivalry like Auburn/UGA and UT/Alabama, you can bet your arse we wouldn't want to change them. I don't see any UT fans complaining about having to play Alabama every year, and they're the most detrimented by the whole thing.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:41 pm to OppositeMan
quote:
LSU played and plays a tougher schedule than bama in both 2018 and 2019.
So you know how strong the teams on our 2019 schedules will be?
Did you predict Miami to go 7-6 and Richt to retire? What about Auburn at 8-5? Did anyone expect Florida to go 10-3? Did anyone expect Louisville to go 2-10 and fire their coach? So are you saying you can tell me right now that our schedule will be harder next year? For all we know Texas and Florida take a nose dive and don't end up being strong opponents.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:49 pm to lsufball19
quote:
So are you saying you can tell me right now that our schedule will be harder next year?
He has no clue. I don't even think he fully understands what point he is trying to make here. Apparently LSU needs to re work its entire scheduling parameters because we were #1 s.o.s. in 2018 and Bama was "only" #5. You just need to ignore that Bama had a higher sos from 2012-2017 for his point to make even a little sense.

Posted on 1/15/19 at 3:50 pm to lsufball19
quote:
LSU is the only program complaining about the permanent cross-division games and it makes us look like losers looking for an easy road.
Another great point.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 4:03 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
He has no clue. I don't even think he fully understands what point he is trying to make here. Apparently LSU needs to re work its entire scheduling parameters because we were #1 s.o.s. in 2018 and Bama was "only" #5. You just need to ignore that Bama had a higher sos from 2012-2017 for his point to make even a little sense
I honestly don't even think he knows what he's arguing anymore. He's tried to move the goal posts of the entire thread that the entire premise is whether or not Alabama had a harder schedule this year, as if there is some way to go back in time each year and change the schedules so we have an easier schedule than them. Also completely discounting the fact that they had a top 5 SOS this year

If we are to follow the argument in the OP that there is a bias in the SEC regarding scheduling, then he has failed to provide any rational reason as to why. Showing that one year we had a harder schedule does not accomplish that goal. If this argument were made when we were still doing bridge scheduling, then I could see that argument because the SEC was making schedules on a year-to-year basis regarding rotating cross-division games and Alabama played all the weak teams in the East during that time period. But that isn't what he's doing at all.
Posted on 1/15/19 at 4:06 pm to Run DMC
quote:
Bama gets a bye before A&M and before LSU. You can’t tell me that wasn’t planned well in advance
Smart planning IMO..................
Popular
Back to top
