- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "If USC wants an SEC grudge match, LSU is in the market..."
Posted on 7/10/10 at 11:47 am to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 7/10/10 at 11:47 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
He's certainly better than Kiffin.
if you say so.
He is though. That is pretty simple.
1
Posted on 7/10/10 at 12:56 pm to dukke v
This could be a terrible idea depending on USC's probation. If USC is not eligible for the Coaches poll, LSU would get no credit in the computer polls for playing USC. Why would we do that?
Posted on 7/10/10 at 1:00 pm to martiansgohome
quote:
LSU would get no credit in the computer polls for playing USC. Why would we do that?
I don't think this matters to some LSU fans. They have such a jealousy for USC its UNREAL.
Posted on 7/10/10 at 3:28 pm to dukke v
quote:
LSU would get no credit in the computer polls for playing USC. Why would we do that?
I don't think this matters to some LSU fans. They have such a jealousy for USC its UNREAL.
Dukke I have the pleasure of working with several USC alums/fans. Believe me, the jealousy goes both ways.
Posted on 7/10/10 at 4:11 pm to ffhouston
The hate really goes back to 1979 for me.
Another LSU win stolen by vindictive referees...
Another LSU win stolen by vindictive referees...
Posted on 7/10/10 at 4:21 pm to RushTigerLimbaugh
quote:
Another LSU win stolen by vindictive referees...
What are you talking about? The illegal procedure?
The missed offensive movement did not necessarily affect the game? SC would have had two downs to get the first. They had moved the ball well that night. They might have gotten it, they might not have.
This post was edited on 7/10/10 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 7/10/10 at 4:29 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I'm done with this thread.
- LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 7/10/10 at 4:34 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Oh yeah. Topics changed t one of my favorites. I was really done with Stephen and shoudl have made that clear.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 7/10/10 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:32 am to Rocket
I am sure Stanford is a tougher foe than Vanderbilt, Kentucky, Ole Miss, or Mississippi State for that matter.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:36 am to the LSUSaint
SC has always had the philosophy of playing anyone anywhere. Look at the last 10 years. They have traveled tens of thousands of miles more than LSU for games..
LSU has been west of the rockies once in 10 years.
SC has gone East of the Mississippi almost every year and played the likes of Auburn, Arkansas, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Notre Dame, Ohio State..
Doubt many teams can top that schedule.
LSU has been west of the rockies once in 10 years.
SC has gone East of the Mississippi almost every year and played the likes of Auburn, Arkansas, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Notre Dame, Ohio State..
Doubt many teams can top that schedule.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:37 am to RexWilde
Debatable
But, SC had no business getting the score run up on them by Stanford.
But, SC had no business getting the score run up on them by Stanford.
This post was edited on 7/15/10 at 12:40 am
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:39 am to RexWilde
quote:
Doubt many teams can top that schedule.
You need as many tough OOC games to make up for your conference schedule.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:41 am to geauxldeneye
Hate to blow your bubble but USC is 1 mile from the ESPN office in LA. Doubt they need much media exposure. They are mentioned on ESPN almost everyday and have been for almost 6 months.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:42 am to JJ27
He is lucky. And you are lucky to walk away with a win against Washington at Washington. Playing in the Pacific Northwest isn't so easy... The weather can really affect the game up there. something the TEAMS in the SEC don't deal with ever.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:46 am to JJ27
If the SEC is so tough. How do you explain
UCLA beating Tennessee at Tennessee and at UCLA..
USC beating AUBURN (with Ron Brown and Cadillac Williams) both at Auburn and at USC.
USC BLOWING OUT ARKANSAS 70-17. YES 70-17 and also blowing them out at home in California.
Hard for people to believe that the SEC is so tough when in head to head competition things like that happen.
UCLA beating Tennessee at Tennessee and at UCLA..
USC beating AUBURN (with Ron Brown and Cadillac Williams) both at Auburn and at USC.
USC BLOWING OUT ARKANSAS 70-17. YES 70-17 and also blowing them out at home in California.
Hard for people to believe that the SEC is so tough when in head to head competition things like that happen.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 12:55 am to Rocket
true. SC's defense was maligned that game and missing some key players on the corners and the defensive line. And STanford is a much better team than people give them credit for being.
I think John Elway went there. Oh and Jim Plunkett oh and John Lynch. I am sure there are others....
So they aren't always the "pushover" that people in the SEC think they are.
Harbaugh also has instilled a toughness to the program. We shall see if it has any momentum now that Gearhardt is not running the rock
I think John Elway went there. Oh and Jim Plunkett oh and John Lynch. I am sure there are others....
So they aren't always the "pushover" that people in the SEC think they are.
Harbaugh also has instilled a toughness to the program. We shall see if it has any momentum now that Gearhardt is not running the rock
Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:00 am to Rocket
well as I have stated before. I doubt the SEC schedule is as tough as you say.
I just don't think the following teams are any good
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
Ole Miss
Miss State
South Carolina and Auburn are very up and down.
Georgia can be up and down also.
Alabama was a door stop until Saban came back. So in my opinion, you have three good teams.
Florida
LSU
Alabama.
And you don't always play them every year..
Florida never leaves the state of Florida OOC???
Please.
If your teams travelled up to Minnesota or Oregon or Ohio State in November when it can sleet, Hail and SNOW and the weather and wind tanks your passing game plus any speed away.You would find yourself losing more games than you do.
But you don't. And your out of conference games are against patsies..
It doesn't hold water to me.
I just don't think the following teams are any good
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
Ole Miss
Miss State
South Carolina and Auburn are very up and down.
Georgia can be up and down also.
Alabama was a door stop until Saban came back. So in my opinion, you have three good teams.
Florida
LSU
Alabama.
And you don't always play them every year..
Florida never leaves the state of Florida OOC???
Please.
If your teams travelled up to Minnesota or Oregon or Ohio State in November when it can sleet, Hail and SNOW and the weather and wind tanks your passing game plus any speed away.You would find yourself losing more games than you do.
But you don't. And your out of conference games are against patsies..
It doesn't hold water to me.
Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:02 am to RexWilde
quote:
think John Elway went there. Oh and Jim Plunkett oh and John Lynch
But, across the board, they don't have the athletes SC does.
quote:
So they aren't always the "pushover" that people in the SEC think they are
Not always, but most of the time
Posted on 7/15/10 at 1:10 am to RexWilde
quote:
well as I have stated before. I doubt the SEC schedule is as tough as you say.
It's usually tougher than SC's. Why do you think that SC didn't make it in the NC game in 2003?
quote:
And you don't always play them every year
We play Florida and Bama annually
quote:
If your teams travelled up to Minnesota or Oregon or Ohio State in November when it can sleet, Hail and SNOW and the weather and wind tanks your passing game plus any speed away.You would find yourself losing more games than you do.
There's no need for us to do that. We can get in national title games with the schedules we have as long as we go undefeated or only lose 1. Hell, we can lose 2 games and still make it in the national title game. Do you not understand? Why take on tougher teams when you don't have to?
quote:
But you don't. And your out of conference games are against patsies..
Like I said, our conference schedule provides us enough competition where we can still make it into the national titles. SC probably wouldn't play the OOC teams if the conference schedule wasn't as soft as it is.
quote:
doesn't hold water to me.
What does or doesn't hold water for you is irrelevant.
This post was edited on 7/15/10 at 1:13 am
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News