re: If Miles wins the last two, does he deserve at least one more year?

quote:

---

In 2010, LSU was a win against Auburn from winning the division until Cam Newton single handedly beat us by rushing for 200 yards and 2 TDs.

---

Your point? LSU still lost, and lost another game that season anyways if you recall. LSU also looked like the worst-coached, most-talented team that year. If you want to go with LSU could've won the division that year, they also could've lost to Tennessee, UF, West Virginia, and Bama and been 5-7. They needed the other teams to eff up or trick plays to survive those games.

quote:

---

Think about it this way using arbitrary numbers and assuming Alabama is the preeminent program in the country since 2005:

Alabama - 1.000
Ohio St - .990
Oregon - .970
TCU - .950
LSU - .940
Florida - .940
Georgia - .910
Mizzou - .880
Auburn - .850
S Carolina - .800
etc. etc.

---

And how are you getting these numbers? That's clearly not winning percentages. Are they made up to try and make a point?

quote:

---

So you think that Miles can bring us back to championship caliber play??? If so, what leads you to believe that?

---

Because I've already seen this show. 34-6 from 2005-07... followed it up with a 17-9 record. People were talking about Saban's recruits and making the Larry Coker comparisons.

Then from 2010-12, we went 34-6 again. After two lackluster seasons in 2014-15, we're poised for a strong year this year and the '14, '15, and '16 recruiting classes are shaping up to be the best of Miles's career.

Whoever is coaching the team for the next five years is walking into a gold mine.

quote:

---

So you think that Miles can bring us back to championship caliber play???

---

yes

quote:

---

If so, what leads you to believe that?

---

because he's done it before. more than once actually

it's amazing how most you idiots were no where to be found the first 8 weeks of the season

quote:

---

hen from 2010-12, we went 34-6 again. After two lackluster seasons in 2014-15

---

So your goal is to ignore 2013?

you ignore that in 2008,2009, and 2010, LSU's record improved each year based on the regular season: 7-5, 9-3, 10-2.

Since 2011, LSU has been 10-2, 9-3, and 8-4, so your trend doesn't work, but according to it, we are going the wrong direction.

quote:

---

it's amazing how most you idiots were no where to be found the first 8 weeks of the season

---

I found it much more entertaining to read the Rant, than watch the last two games.

quote:

---

This is fricking moronic. I'm talking about one game that could have changed a #2 division ranking to #1. You're talking about four games that could have changed a 10-3 record to 5-7.

---

And anyone of those games if went the other way puts LSU tied for 3rd. Technically LSU was 3rd anyway as Arkansas was 10-2 and owned the tiebreaker on us.

quote:

---

Do you know what the term arbitrary means?

---

Yes, you are just making up numbers to suit your argument that seem to be quite precise. It's called sarcasm buddy. Look that up.

quote:

---

Whoever is coaching the team for the next five years is walking into a goldmine

---

Kinda like Miles did, amirite?

Sorry, couldn't help myself.

quote:

---

So your goal is to ignore 2013?

---

Not my goal. I mean to say that 2013-14 were lackluster seasons. If we end this season at 10-2 that's just fine by me.

quote:

---

Since 2011, LSU has been 10-2, 9-3, and 8-4, so your trend doesn't work, but according to it, we are going the wrong direction.

---

My "trend" groups together 2010, 2011, and 2012. We went 9-3 in 2013 and 8-4 in 2014 amid heavy personnel losses and have rebounded nicely this year.

quote:

---

It's a fricking scale based on the W/L record of programs over the last 11 years. Don't get mad just because you can't understand simple concepts.

---

Um when anyone presents data or stats to back their argument, they should explain how the data/stats was determined. Your the moron stating numbers with absolutely nothing, not even reasoning, supporting them.