- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If any of my employees refused a meeting
Posted on 3/17/19 at 7:49 pm to beauxroux
Posted on 3/17/19 at 7:49 pm to beauxroux
quote:
If you read his contract...
Don't have to read it...
All I have to know is that with wiretaps and FBI investigations that he is caught up in.. no contract anywhere at anytime requires him to surrender his rights...
Posted on 3/17/19 at 7:58 pm to klrstix
quote:
Don't have to read it... All I have to know is that with wiretaps and FBI investigations that he is caught up in.. no contract anywhere at anytime requires him to surrender his rights...
No offense, but you’re misinformed on the law. The contract is the law between the parties. In this case the contract explicitly requires WW to fully cooperate with any possible LSU or NCAA investigation.
If your legal position is that WW is under criminal investigation (which he is not) and therefore he is not required to comply with his contractual obligations by asserting some constitutional privilege (like the right to not incriminate himself) — you’d be completely wrong.
For example— an employer suspects an employee has stolen from him. The employer wants to meet with the employee and police. The employee refuses asserting his 5th amendment right to avoid self incrimination. Even without contractual language requiring the employee to fully cooperate, the employee can be fired.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 8:34 pm to Likeadog
You idiot you fire him the ncaa will still drop the hammer on your school dummy
Posted on 3/17/19 at 8:41 pm to Likeadog
You smell...........Likeadog.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 8:46 pm to Likeadog
I’m retired but was in the energy business for 35 years and retired a senior VP and will say NOT ONCE did I ever do anything remotely close to what this administration has with the mishandling of a sensitive matter. Everything is privileged between Wade and his attorney. If LSU were paying for the attorney then they would have a right to interview him. If they were remotely smart, they wouldn’t have started this without consulting a decent attorney and strategist/PR firm.
They KNOW he can’t do what they are asking, so that’s why they are able to do what they are doing. Complete spin job in my opinion.
My Opinion only
This issue is not on Wade.
This is all about OLOL and INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL.
Wade is a scapegoat. To save their own asses and much bigger fish. Don’t be shocked if Alleva isn’t caught up in this as well.
They KNOW he can’t do what they are asking, so that’s why they are able to do what they are doing. Complete spin job in my opinion.
My Opinion only
This issue is not on Wade.
This is all about OLOL and INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL.
Wade is a scapegoat. To save their own asses and much bigger fish. Don’t be shocked if Alleva isn’t caught up in this as well.
This post was edited on 3/17/19 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 3/17/19 at 9:04 pm to klrstix
quote:
Don't have to read it... All I have to know is that with wiretaps and FBI investigations that he is caught up in.. no contract anywhere at anytime requires him to surrender his rights...
Remain ignorant, or read the contract, your choice.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 9:10 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
If they were remotely smart, they wouldn’t have started this without consulting a decent attorney and strategist/PR firm.
They are able to do what they are doing because Wade agreed to this type of action in the event of a situation like this when he signed the contract with LSU. A contract which was almost certainly drafted by some decent attorneys.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 9:49 pm to EA6B
quote:Doesn’t matter. It’s still protected by privilege. He could have showed up and said nothing.
They are able to do what they are doing because Wade agreed to this type of action in the event of a situation like this when he signed the contract with LSU. A contract which was almost certainly drafted by some decent attorneys.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 10:28 pm to beauxroux
Nice to have an intelligent person enter the conversation. Thanks, beauxroux
Posted on 3/17/19 at 10:33 pm to beauxroux
Lol, grammar police man, its called auto correct on your iphone bud. Sometimes it changes your words. Its funny that you need to resort grammar attacks - its because you cant validate your argument with anything else!!
The fact is that WW is far from done in college coaching, he may be reinstated at LSU, but more likely he will be coaching somewhere else later, just like Calipari and others before. Rantards insisting he’s “ruined” etc are just plain ignorant.
And yes, LSU’s administration has mishandled this. We will likely lose the best thing that’s happened to LSU basketball in decades. Other colleges were already going to steal WW from us with big bucks. Now its guaranteed he’ll likely move on.
You can argue that LSU was within its rights to suspend WW, no one disputes that. BUT it was clearly a stupid move and everyone knows it. And yeh, if Alleva and co coukd fire WW they already would have. This is a STALEMATE at this point for a reason. Beauxro, its a shame that youre a lawyer and more folks have this figured correctly on this thread than you do.
The fact is that WW is far from done in college coaching, he may be reinstated at LSU, but more likely he will be coaching somewhere else later, just like Calipari and others before. Rantards insisting he’s “ruined” etc are just plain ignorant.
And yes, LSU’s administration has mishandled this. We will likely lose the best thing that’s happened to LSU basketball in decades. Other colleges were already going to steal WW from us with big bucks. Now its guaranteed he’ll likely move on.
You can argue that LSU was within its rights to suspend WW, no one disputes that. BUT it was clearly a stupid move and everyone knows it. And yeh, if Alleva and co coukd fire WW they already would have. This is a STALEMATE at this point for a reason. Beauxro, its a shame that youre a lawyer and more folks have this figured correctly on this thread than you do.
This post was edited on 3/17/19 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 3/17/19 at 10:35 pm to Tiger1988
Agreed with Tiger 1988. This is a full on LSU shite show. Not a WW debacle.
This post was edited on 3/17/19 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 3/18/19 at 8:19 am to beauxroux
quote:
No offense, but you’re misinformed on the law. The contract is the law between the parties.
And the contract is subject to our nations constitution...
This fact has been established quite thoroughly.
Posted on 3/18/19 at 9:19 am to Likeadog
What if that employee brought your company from the bottom of the barrel, a laughing stock, to the top of the field in you your region?
Posted on 3/18/19 at 5:44 pm to klrstix
quote:
And the contract is subject to our nations constitution... This fact has been established quite thoroughly.
Tell me the constitutional right of which WW would be deprived if he met with LSU?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News