- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I never really understand the “I don’t know how good the opposition is” thing in a win
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:30 pm
When my team is knowingly playing a weaker team, I look for two things. First are we executing as a team and are we winning individual battles.
Second, if it’s an obviously weaker team, did we blow them out.
I get that Clemson is a question mark and they appear to be weaker than expected. When we play La Tech and especially McNeese, the two areas I focus on come into play.
So, blow out the weak teams, have decisive wins against the good but not great teams and compete and execute against everybody.
Second, if it’s an obviously weaker team, did we blow them out.
I get that Clemson is a question mark and they appear to be weaker than expected. When we play La Tech and especially McNeese, the two areas I focus on come into play.
So, blow out the weak teams, have decisive wins against the good but not great teams and compete and execute against everybody.
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:33 pm to NorthTiger
I agree with you, I just think it’s people trying to acknowledge that LSU will play much better teams than Clemson this year. What we did is still very impressive nonetheless
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:38 pm to NorthTiger
Absolutely correct. If nothing else we "know" more than many teams in the SEC.
51-10 against Clemson is better than:
54-14 against Arkansas Pine Bluff
51-0 against UTEP
63-3 against Tennessee State
59-7 against Texas State
50-0 against Missouri State
48-10 against ECU
56-9 against Furman
57-0 against Kent State
45-13 against Youngstown State
31-14 against North Alabama
28-9 against Austin Peay
62-13 against UL Monroe
66-21 against Florida Atlantic
Only Auburn (beat Baylor) and Ole Miss (playing Louisville) are playing teams with a pulse in Week 1.
51-10 against Clemson is better than:
54-14 against Arkansas Pine Bluff
51-0 against UTEP
63-3 against Tennessee State
59-7 against Texas State
50-0 against Missouri State
48-10 against ECU
56-9 against Furman
57-0 against Kent State
45-13 against Youngstown State
31-14 against North Alabama
28-9 against Austin Peay
62-13 against UL Monroe
66-21 against Florida Atlantic
Only Auburn (beat Baylor) and Ole Miss (playing Louisville) are playing teams with a pulse in Week 1.
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:42 pm to NorthTiger
The fact that we executed is the known factor. And that has no ambiguity. To me it means good coaching. What is fair to ponder is whether that kind of execution would transfer to other teams that might appear to execute well.
That was absolute and total dominance. Especially on defense. An obvious question would be "is this team THAT good"?
That was absolute and total dominance. Especially on defense. An obvious question would be "is this team THAT good"?
Posted on 9/6/26 at 1:51 pm to NorthTiger
quote:
First are we executing as a team and are we winning individual battles.
Which are directly and closely related to the strength of the opponent who’s trying to prevent us from executing as a team and winning individual battles.
Posted on 9/6/26 at 2:00 pm to McLemore
quote:
First are we executing as a team and are we winning individual battles. Which are directly and closely related to the strength of the opponent who’s trying to prevent us from executing as a team and winning individual battles.
We’ve all sat through LSU games in just the past decade where we played a clearly inferior opponent and we didn’t win individual battles. The game was boring and the outcome was a win but it wasn’t a blowout
2021 LSU 27 ULM 14
2024 LSU 44 Nichols 21
Even the great 2019 trailed NSU 7-3 at the end of the first quarter but like a great team is able to do they went on to win 65-14
Posted on 9/6/26 at 2:01 pm to NorthTiger
It was one of the most solid opening performances I’ve seen from a team in a long time regardless of the opponent. Penalties were damn near non existent. The execution was there. Yeah we had a hiccup or two but you expect a little of that in first games.
It was a solid “A” performance that minus a dropped pass or two and a late game half assed effort to stop them on their only scoring “drive” would have been a perfect game.
It was a solid “A” performance that minus a dropped pass or two and a late game half assed effort to stop them on their only scoring “drive” would have been a perfect game.
Posted on 9/6/26 at 2:20 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
agree with you, I just think it’s people trying to acknowledge that LSU will play much better teams than Clemson this year. What we did is still very impressive nonetheless
This. We have a tendency to play down to programs instead of stepping on them on the way to try and win it all. These games should be just data for us to process and we did that last night
Popular
Back to top
5







