- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I can see the writing on the wall with these suspensions
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:26 pm to CantonTiger128
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:26 pm to CantonTiger128
This isn't the first thing that came to mind. First thing that comes to mind is we'll need to open the passing game up more to make Ford more effective.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:27 pm to CptBengal
quote:
CantonTiger128
you are my favorite poser
FIFY
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:27 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
For us in the middle who really do not give a shite, its just getting old and tired tbh.
I understand that.
But I think the difference is JL has led our offense to levels we haven't seen in a long time, and let's face it, JJ led us to an abortion of an offense. I am simply debating and defending a very high performing offense/ compared to a very poor performing offense. IT is that simple.
If the roles were reversed, and JJ was the one performing highly, and JL was the one who had underperformed for two years.....I'd be saying the same thing in defense of JJ.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:27 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
My terrible outlook is on a qb I have watched for 2 years, with a qb rating of 100's
quote:
yep, i'm a fricktard for not wanting a qb that has averaged a triple digit quarterback rating the past 2 years.
I'm not sure you know what quarterback rating is.
Jefferson will likely get 40% of the snaps last week, pretty much like what happened last week. He's the backup quarterback, they are supposed to get more snaps late, in blowout, games. (Right, he "started" the second half in a ten point game.)
Also, you seem to go from being concerned with the number of snaps to the number of minutes... Obviously when you are playing ball control offense, running the ball in the second half, the QB will get less snaps with more minutes.
Step back from the edge, people. Or leap off, that will make us happier.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:28 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
I don't have to explain the bottom line between the offense ran by JL, and the offense ran by JJ. Most successful executives do the same thing....if they want to remain successful.
Isn't the botom line WINS?
So what does it matter of the offense lights the board up or not if the bottom line is achieved?
What you are saying is that you are placing your "want" first. We won't go into exactly what your "want" is right now.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:28 pm to CantonTiger128
If anything, I see us passing a little bit more. JL is the better passer.
See where I'm going?
See where I'm going?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:32 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Why do you think people have to be friends with JJ if they don't hate him? Guess what, I like some people and I don't like others. That says absolutely nothing about everyone in between.
because you cannot objectively compare their performances and believe that JJ should be starting, or playing a lot....if you have any intelligence at all. The difference in performance is not just a minor improvement. It is a HUGE difference.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:33 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
because you cannot objectively compare their performances and believe that JJ should be starting, or playing a lot
No one said this.
quote:
....if you have any intelligence at all.
Yes, clearly, we are the ones who are stupid.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:36 pm to Uncommon Cents
quote:
Isn't the botom line WINS?
So what does it matter of the offense lights the board up or not if the bottom line is achieved?
What you are saying is that you are placing your "want" first. We won't go into exactly what your "want" is right now.
you got it...exactly. LSU is extremely talented, probably most talented in the country the last few years. They are going to win a lot of games no matter who is QB. They won a lot of games despite JJ being ranked 107th efficiency, and a very poor scoring offense, and high level of 3 and outs, which wears out the defense.
The difference is being able to win 9 or 10 games or 12 games. Most teams lsu can beat with talent alone. A few teams, lsu cannot beat without a good offense....thus 4 losses in 2009 and 2 losses last year.
You could say the same thing about crowton too right? I mean he won a lot of games. Remember last year virtually every single game was a single digit nail biter? How much have you seen that this year with JL leading the way. Our D is better, but not that much better. they just got worn down last year by constant inept offense.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:37 pm to Uncommon Cents
nm
This post was edited on 10/19/11 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:39 pm to CantonTiger128
Unlike you, MANY on here could give a rats arse who plays QB as long as we come out the game 8-0!!!
Good to see even you ain't putting up with this guys lame act.
quote:
TIGERLEE
Good to see even you ain't putting up with this guys lame act.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:40 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
Your wrong again. The bottom line is if you are supposed to win by 30 then win by 30. That is the difference this year compared to years past that you do not get.
NOT BARELY WINNING EVERY GAME AND HAVING A HEART ATTACK AT THE SAME TIME WHEN YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE BLOWING TEAMS OUT
I am done in here because you will never "get it".
Could you please direct me to the nail-biter(s) we had this year?
Fact is, you and Canton are chicken little's who apparently expect (possibly want) everything to come crashing down. It's not our fault you can't enjoy the season, especially when you have absolutely no control over anything to do with it.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:42 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
okay...you don't believe me....wait. I'm saying right now JJ gets 65%-70% of the snaps Saturday.
I bookmarked this post.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:42 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
I bookmarked this post.
I liked your post. Can you send out the bat-signal on Sunday in case I forget?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:43 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
crowton
The absence of him is a WAY bigger component in the offense's success so far this season than you'd probably likely admit. Just looking to pin it on Jefferson.
After 2008, many on this board didn't want to see Lee set foot on the field again. Now, he's the best thing ever.
People seem to forget that Jefferson had a decent year in 2009. Granted he had some struggles with taking sacks, but I'm willing to bet that was a product of the previous season.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:46 pm to CantonTiger128
I swear, it's like someone flipped on the lights and now cockroaches are pouring out of everywhere.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:46 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
With ware out, I can see miles playing JJ an extremely large amount of the time
Another shitty thread where you go Chicken Little about JJ.
quote:
Hope I'm wrong, but wouldn't bet on it.
I hope I'm wrong, but I wouldn't bet against you starting more shitty threads just like this one until you get banned.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:49 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Could you please direct me to the nail-biter(s) we had this year?
quote:
That is the difference this year compared to years past that you do not get.
You need this to help you read! Dumbass.
Read what I said, then read your reply.
This post was edited on 10/19/11 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:51 pm to CantonTiger128
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/11 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:55 pm to CantonTiger128
quote:
for all of you who are estatic with our offense with JL leading the way......bad news. With ware out, I can see miles playing JJ an extremely large amount of the time, saying "we needed a spark in the running game without ware". Hope I'm wrong, but wouldn't bet on it.
That Miles is an evil genius not only is the OP correct but no doubt Miles spiked the drug tests of TM7 and Simon in addition to Ware to throw us all off the track of his real goal of benching JL in favor of JJ.
Popular
Back to top


0






