- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many quarters would it take for LSU to score 60 points
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
You need to have a want to score 60 points on a team in a blowout. Our coaches seem fine sleeping through easy games or building a lead and sitting on it.
0
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Yeah, but I also think Au is much more physical on offense than UO.
Maybe it was just me, but I thought the Ducks looked kind of small.
I think they are much more like WVA than AU. UO is also not a one man show, they might not be as physical as AU, but they have more guys who can make a play.
I think LSUs combo of size and speed may be too much for Orgeon.
Plus I think Newton is>>>>>better than anyone on UO, even james.
Maybe it was just me, but I thought the Ducks looked kind of small.
I think they are much more like WVA than AU. UO is also not a one man show, they might not be as physical as AU, but they have more guys who can make a play.
I think LSUs combo of size and speed may be too much for Orgeon.
Plus I think Newton is>>>>>better than anyone on UO, even james.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
UTenn-UO: 48-13
UTenn-LSU: 16-14
for reference
That makes about as much since as this:
LSU 29 MSU 7
Au 17 MSU 14.
That doesn't mean LSU is 2 touchdowns better than AU any more than it means OU is 5 touchdowns better than LSU.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yay for popularity contests!
last night was big for UO in terms of national popularity
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:51 am to RANDY44
I agree. Those types of "references" are all but meaningless.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
Thomas would be average here, it's OU system that makes them great (see Masoli)
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:56 am to Y.A. Tittle
it was in response to how UO couldn't handle the "physical" SEC. i should have left the LSU game off
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:57 am to Gmorgan4982
quote:
Yay for popularity contests
i didn't even mean that for rankings
popularity = recruits and money, which is what builds your program
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:00 am to CajunFootball
quote:
UTenn-UO: 48-13 UTenn-LSU: 16-14 for reference
That's just genius. Individual player match ups have nothing to do with football. If this made any sense Vegas would have us beating Auburn in a landslide. beacause of our week 3 game! haha
LSU-MSU 29-7
AU-MSU 17-14
I'm not arguing that Oregon doesn't have a great offense but come on after going through the SEC they would have 2 loses just like most of the teams usually do. We have pretty fast defenses in the SEC if you have not heard. Clown.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:01 am to TallTex
outside of LSU, who has a great D in the SEC this year?
Bama? no
AU? hell no
UGA? hell no
Arky? hell no
UF? no
maybe USC or MSU?
this is a DOWN year for SEC Ds
Bama? no
AU? hell no
UGA? hell no
Arky? hell no
UF? no
maybe USC or MSU?
this is a DOWN year for SEC Ds
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 11:02 am
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it was in response to how UO couldn't handle the "physical" SEC.
I don't think they'd be putting up 60 every week.
If I said OU 48 Tenn 13
UGA 41 Tenn 14
And tried to argue UGA is obviously a fairly comparable team to OU, I'd look pretty ridiculous, no?
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
LSU blowouts are always in the 40's, you never see them completely destroy a team like other schools!
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:06 am to CajunFootball
Oregon seems like they always collapse at the end of the year. They're the opposite of VT.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 11:07 am
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sorry for assuming that.
i didn't even mean that for rankings
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:10 am to tubucoco
Oregon's lowest offensive output in terms of points this season is 42. You can talk about how they don't play SEC defenses all you want, but what did LSU do against teams such as Vandy and McNeese? Very unimpressive outputs. The 32 points we put up against McNeese should have been our output from the first half alone. It shouldn't have taken us the entire game to do so.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:38 am to OFWHAP
that's what I'm talkin about when I say LSU blowouts are in the 40's or so because of the coaching, they have all these talented, skilled players they use wrong, and keep makin dumb mistake after dumb mistake to keep teams in the game. They should have run away from Florida, but let them back in it, any other SEC team would have put it's foot on Florida's neck and crushed it.
and the McNeese score should have been at least 62-14 or something like that!
and the McNeese score should have been at least 62-14 or something like that!
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:43 am to TallTex
quote:
That's just genius. Individual player match ups have nothing to do with football. If this made any sense Vegas would have us beating Auburn in a landslide. beacause of our week 3 game! haha
LSU-MSU 29-7
AU-MSU 17-14
If Auburn throws it to us 5 times, I'm pretty sure we'll beat them by a couple of scores too.
Pretty absurd for anyone to defend that LSU-Tenn game from an "individual player match ups" perspective. If Oregon matches up that better with Tenn than we do, then Oregon has a lot better players than we do (which they don't).
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
likely UO/OU title with what i'd guess is a 33% shot at LSu/AU getting in over OU
Doubtful.
If Auburn or LSU keep winning, OU is shite out of luck.
Theyd easily drop to 4 in the human polls if LSU/AU goes unbeaten
Theyd also be crushed in the computers.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 11:50 am
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i don't know why you'd ever choose not to put up as many points as you could
It's called running the ball and killing the clock. Plenty of teams do it.
You don't get more than one W no matter how many points you score. What you do get is hacks thinking it actually means something.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:55 am to Jaydeaux
the hacks you refer to are on the offensive coaching side of the ball because you don't keep calling dumb arse plays like they do that causes TO's or other things to keep inferior teams in games.
but you'll probably pull something else out your arse, you always do when it comes to defending Crowton or Les!
but you'll probably pull something else out your arse, you always do when it comes to defending Crowton or Les!
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 11:57 am
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News