- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

How about a new head coaches contract to chew on.....
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:12 pm
Wins against any conference: +$1MIL/game
Losses against power 4 conference: minus $500,000/game
Losses against subpar conference: minus $1MIL/game
Lowest salary possible: $2MIL/year
Example:
9-4 season = $7MIL
15-0 season = $15MIL
2-10 season = $2MIL
6-6 season = $3MIL
10MIL guaranteed contracts for 10 years is not sustainable, IMO.
Losses against power 4 conference: minus $500,000/game
Losses against subpar conference: minus $1MIL/game
Lowest salary possible: $2MIL/year
Example:
9-4 season = $7MIL
15-0 season = $15MIL
2-10 season = $2MIL
6-6 season = $3MIL
10MIL guaranteed contracts for 10 years is not sustainable, IMO.
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:13 pm to oldskule
There’s going to be a change at some point. Massive guarantees for coaches will not be around forever.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:19 pm to burdman
There has got to be real accountability. It is not fair to the university or the donors to dish out huge sums of cash even when they crash and burn.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:35 pm to oldskule
It’s a supply and demand situation. Huge surplus in fan base interest and desire to win a nattie & not enough championship caliber coaches on the market. They hold all the cards so they have no reason to raise accountability. I do like your scenario, just can’t imagine that ever coming to fruition.
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:41 pm to livnthehighlife
I do not ever expect this to happen, at least not in my lifetime....but over time, something needs to happen.
I would love to see these coaches on tight games when $1MIL bucks are on the line!
I would love to see these coaches on tight games when $1MIL bucks are on the line!
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:50 pm to oldskule
I don’t think it’ll ever be what you’re proposing, but there should absolutely be less base salary with higher incentives and bonuses for performance. And have requirements to meet or the buyout is reduced (ie. buyout being reduced by 50% if you finish unranked one year or outside of the top 15 for 2 seasons in a row)
Posted on 11/10/24 at 6:57 pm to oldskule
How about loss = no pay for that game.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:00 pm to Jd75189
Versus BK getting some 800k for yesterday’s coaching performance!
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:01 pm to Jd75189
A loss = negative pay, take another look....
You lose 500,000 against a power 4 conference
You lose 1MIL against a subpar conference teams....
You lose 500,000 against a power 4 conference
You lose 1MIL against a subpar conference teams....
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:04 pm to oldskule
As long as football floats Athletic departments, this won’t happen. Eventually you’ll just see programs fold because they can’t compete financially.
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:07 pm to oldskule
I had a similar idea recently. My proposal is much simpler, something like this:
1 mil for every conference win
700k for power 4 non conf win
500k for other win
Bonus 1 mil for making playoffs
Bonus 1 mil for every playoff win
Bonus 2 mil for natty
Potential total compensation is +/-16 mil if you win it all.
Something like that. Pay per win is the only way forward in my opinion. Basically a commission based pay for head coaches. The better you perform, the more you get paid.
1 mil for every conference win
700k for power 4 non conf win
500k for other win
Bonus 1 mil for making playoffs
Bonus 1 mil for every playoff win
Bonus 2 mil for natty
Potential total compensation is +/-16 mil if you win it all.
Something like that. Pay per win is the only way forward in my opinion. Basically a commission based pay for head coaches. The better you perform, the more you get paid.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:25 pm to oldskule
Okay let's flip that bone and chew on this scenario: Explain how this flexible non guaranteed contract works when your Athletics Dept is knee deep in national Title IX investigations that LSU found itself in 2022. If no top tier coach wants to touch you with a 10-foot pole because you're being heavily investigated for a slew of sexual and female civil rights shite across multiple sports, how does your year-to-year incentives deal work then?
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:33 pm to Jd75189
quote:
How about loss = no pay for that game.
Coach A calls up Coach B and proposes let's you and me split our salary down the middle no matter the outcome.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:38 pm to oldskule
Told a buddy today that this is what is needed.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 7:52 pm to burdman
quote:
There’s going to be a change at some point. Massive guarantees for coaches will not be around forever
College football is just a minor league football league now and has little to do with the actual university.
It will turn into the NFL. You will have constant firings and reshuffling of the same coaches in the SEC and Big Ten.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:07 pm to burdman
Well, it should have never started and I have been thinking colleges would get themselves better contracts like a performance contract. Every season salary is based how how much you get paid. You win all Big you loose each one reduces your payout and too many in 4-5 year no more contract buyout
Posted on 11/10/24 at 9:41 pm to oldskule
I've been saying for years the payment for these guys ain't worth it. I've been getting down-voted every time. I hope that college powers that be get their act together and stop putting a choke hold on us with these salaries. We are still paying Coach O if I remember correctly, then people wanna fire BK and pay him, and then hire a new guy. This comes to big wigs putting us money, and driving up all costs associated with prices involving going to a game one way or another. Say what you want, it's not sustainable bc not the players want some money to, a piece of the the pie.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:00 pm to oldskule
Losing home night game -$500K
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:09 pm to Vincenzo Pantangelli
quote:
[quote]Losing home night game -$500K[/quote
Losing season opener- $750K
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:19 pm to oldskule
how do you propose getting anybody to accept that offer?
Popular
Back to top
