- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Honestly, the SEC really hasn’t felt the same since 2012 with the A&M and Mizzou additions
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:34 pm
Purely from a fan’s perspective. I get the logical reasoning of adding more teams but I really pulled for the conference and appreciated it more pre 2012.
I didn’t like the Texas and Oklahoma additions either. I get the money and television revenue from adding these universities but something about the conference just felt more authentic and organic before the expansion.
I didn’t like the Texas and Oklahoma additions either. I get the money and television revenue from adding these universities but something about the conference just felt more authentic and organic before the expansion.
7
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:35 pm to Paul Allen
LSU vs OSU every year sounds good to me. That would draw some viewers.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:39 pm to Paul Allen
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:39 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:43 pm to Paul Allen
Been saying this for awhile. Conference hasn’t felt the same since then. It felt more southern in the SEC prior to 2012. It was the souths Confrence. SEC felt like a southern club then now it’s just a league. That’s when SEC pride died.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:52 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
Purely from a fan’s perspective. I get the logical reasoning of adding more teams but I really pulled for the conference and appreciated it more pre 2012.
I didn’t like the Texas and Oklahoma additions either. I get the money and television revenue from adding these universities but something about the conference just felt more authentic and organic before the expansion.
We didn't need Arkansas and South Carolina, either. This conference was better when it was 10 teams and Roy Kramer was running things.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:53 pm to Paul Allen
SEC hasn't felt the same since allowing ARkansas admission much less South Carolina, OU, Missouri, utex, and 8&4
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:54 pm to Paul Allen
Agreed. When we didn’t play Miss State last year, Florida this year or Bama next year, I’ve already seen what this SEC has to offer.
Let Texas have it. We can find better a better way.
Let Texas have it. We can find better a better way.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:58 pm to wfallstiger
quote:
since allowing ARkansas admission much less South Carolina, OU, Missouri, utex, and 8&4
INdeed
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:32 pm to Domeskeller
quote:
We didn't need Arkansas and South Carolina, either.
Maybe didn’t need them but they were solid additions and done in the early 90’s. Kind of got used to them.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:36 pm to Paul Allen
Adding UT and OU was a horrible decision. Too hard to get through the conference with a good enough record to make the playoffs, when strength of schedule means less than the record. So what does Sankey do? Add a 9th conference game. Dumb.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News