- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hitting problems at catcher
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:29 am to TigerFan2211
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:29 am to TigerFan2211
So if our SS AND Second baseman are great on Def. but hit 200 should they stay in the lineup.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:29 am to madcap
You sacrifice the offense at this point in the year. Ross is more than capable of getting hot at tourney time, he had some big hits in regional play last year. Ross is a SEC catcher and the best option you have at this point.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:30 am to bbap
quote:
n which case there would be no DH. you cannot DH and play a position as the same time. that's what you call impossible.
I think you misunderstood the comment. I think he meant DH FOR Ross. Not put Ross in the DH spot.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:30 am to BIG CAT
quote:
this is the first year he has thrown runners out last year was not good
2012
Stolen Base Attempts: 29
Caught Stolen: 16
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:30 am to Specktator
quote:
And bat the pitcher??
Just to keep this going...besides Eades, who was a hell of a hitter in high school, what other pitchers would even have a .000001% chance of getting an at-bat?
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:31 am to BIG CAT
quote:
So if our SS AND Second baseman are great on Def. but hit 200 should they stay in the lineup.
Dude, seriously? Do you not understand the difference between a catcher and a middle infielder? A catcher is the most important defensive position on the field. The ability to handle a pitching staff is priority number one with a catcher.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:31 am to PurpleAndGold86
yeah that probably is what he meant. still hilarious.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:31 am to BIG CAT
quote:
So if our SS AND Second baseman are great on Def. but hit 200 should they stay in the lineup.
This is where you slink out of the thread and stop posting, not add fuel to the flames.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:31 am to BIG CAT
quote:
So if our SS AND Second baseman are great on Def. but hit 200 should they stay in the lineup.
"JONES" and YES when the team is 22-2 dont change a thing!!!
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:32 am to BIG CAT
quote:
So if our SS AND Second baseman are great on Def. but hit 200 should they stay in the lineup.
Well Nola didn't hit for crap his freshman season.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:32 am to liquid rabbit
can anyone name a top notch catcher in the mlb that hits over 300 consistently?
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:32 am to bbap
quote:
yeah that probably is what he meant. still hilarious
you do notice that he has not been back in this thread right?
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:32 am to liquid rabbit
quote:
I guess he figures any pitcher could easily hit above .200.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:33 am to redfieldk717
quote:
can anyone name a top notch catcher in the mlb that hits over 300 consistently?
Mauer...and that's about it
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:33 am to BIG CAT
quote:
When is it time to make a change at catcher.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:33 am to redfieldk717
quote:
can anyone name a top notch catcher in the mlb that hits over 300 consistently?
Sure, Buster Posey.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:33 am to sportsfan
quote:
can anyone name a top notch catcher in the mlb that hits over 300 consistently?
Mauer...and that's about it
or um the NL MVP.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 9:34 am to TigerBait2008
Must be a full moon this morning.
Back to top


4





