Started By
Message

Help me understand why a conference champ game loss matters

Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:47 pm
Posted by Keeper (LSU)
Member since Aug 2005
757 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:47 pm
in certain scenarios. Take Georgia and Alabama for example, or any other similar example. If Georgia wins out, but loses the SEC Championship game, I keep seeing Georgia is out of the playoffs and Bama may be in. I don't understand that. The moment before the SECCG kickoff, Georgia is #4 and they did everything they had to do to win the East. Because of that they have to play in the SECCG and risk a loss and potentially the CFP while a team like Alabama doesn't have to risk another loss, but may get in before UGA. I don't get it.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:48 pm to
Not making it to a conference championship gets you a bye week before the playoffs.

That's fricked up.
Posted by r2d2
Member since Dec 2006
6842 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:49 pm to
Yeah fair point. Why reward the team that didn’t make that game by punishing the one that did. It should only help you but not hurt you.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:49 pm to
It really doesn't make sense

Alabama doesn't have the opportunity to lose in that game

BTW they're not the first to benefit from such a scenario

When Nebraska played Miami in the 2001 season BCS championship they got destroyed by Colorado and did not play in the Big 12 Championship
Posted by r2d2
Member since Dec 2006
6842 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:49 pm to
Except if that would be UGA’s 3rd L.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

Except if that would be UGA’s 3rd L.



If they have 2 losses going in they're already out of the picture most likely unless they would beat us and a lot of chaos occurred
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

If they have 2 losses going in they're already out of the picture most likely unless they would beat us and a lot of chaos occurred


Still, in that case Alabama gets a bye week before the playoffs.

fricked up.
Posted by GEAUXTIGER23
Member since Apr 2008
4893 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:54 pm to
UGA second loss

Posted by SouthdownsTiger4178
Member since Jun 2018
1951 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

Yeah fair point. Why reward the team that didn’t make that game by punishing the one that did. It should only help you but not hurt you.


Yep, is should be an unwritten rule that no back door entry is allowed.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:55 pm to
There should be a rule that a team that did not win its conference championship cannot participate in the playoffs.

It would then be up to each conference's member schools to determine how it's best for their conferences to determine their champion.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8826 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 10:58 pm to
It’s exactly the reason why teams should not get rewarded for getting into championship games or the playoffs. We should not have played Bama in 2011. Same as this year.

And it’s a competitive disadvantage. They get rewarded basically a bye week to rest up and prevent any players from getting injured and play against a team that had to play that extra week against a team that is usually one of the best in its conference. Total BS.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 11:00 pm to
Two words- EYE TEST

By the committee not coming out with any standard or solid criteria it’s basically leaving potential for the same flaws we saw with the BCS just in a different format.
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
11451 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 11:03 pm to
Saban said if a team doesnt win their conference championship they shouldn’t be in cfp then the next yr he said it should be about the body of work of the team to determine if in cfp. You are right but each coach, depending on their position, will say what benefits them. Saban, or any coach for that matter, will say what benefits them at that point in time.

Bama should be out if lsu osu clemson oregon win out
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13085 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 11:03 pm to
If UGA wins out then loses to us, they will be 11-2. Bama, if they win out, will be 11-1. Bama will have both the better record and will be ranked higher than UGA.

For the folks who firmly believe LSU will get a cfp bid at 12-1 with that one loss to UGA, think again. We will be in a pool of other 12-1 teams who are conference champions. It is NOT a given that we'll get that 4th spot as UGA will certainly get the SEC champs spot.

We need to win the SEC title. That is our guarantee of a bid. And our only concern should be getting LSU into the cfp.
This post was edited on 11/14/19 at 11:05 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 11:04 pm to
quote:


Still, in that case Alabama gets a bye week before the playoffs.

fricked up.



Perhaps the solution is as simple as this: if conference championships don't matter to the selection committee then they should pick the final 4 before championship weekend

That way no one benefits or is hurt by the championship game
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
23311 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 11:06 pm to
But Bama plays the juggernaut Western Carolina. You can’t tell me that’s not the same thing as playing an extra game against a top opponent.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:14 am to
quote:

By the committee not coming out with any standard or solid criteria it’s basically leaving potential for the same flaws we saw with the BCS just in a different format.


the committee HUMANS is why the BCS was born in the first place.
HUMANS have an agenda an biases ...I do not care how many times they say they do not. Look at all the talk to get Bama back into the finals.....
It should be about fairness, not the eye test.

Can you imagine that if in the BIG DANCE a #1 team got upset and it would then be brought back into the Final Four


The BCS got it right (after a couple of years) the NCAA got it wrong by keeping the playoffs to 2 teams.
Put the BCS back in, go to 6 teams where #1 and #2 get a bye, since now
#1 and #2 equal 3 and 4.

This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 9:36 am
Posted by warlock1974
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2015
1701 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Not making it to a conference championship gets you a bye week before the playoffs.


If there is just one thing to change about the current system it would address that.

In every other sport, the better team(s) gets the BYE and the lesser team(s) has to play the extra game.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:49 am to
Conference championship games should serve as a de facto round 1 of the playoff.
Posted by CalRipkenJr
Denham Springs
Member since Jan 2007
1577 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Help me understand why a conference champ game loss matters


Beacuse the loser of the SECCG has NEVER made the playoff!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram