- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gary Danielson with a few minutes left in game
Posted on 10/13/09 at 6:38 am to choupiquesushi
Posted on 10/13/09 at 6:38 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
jay barker
david greene
mauck
flynn
russell(has proven now - not to be all that)
leak
doug johnson
john parker wilson
and the list goes on and on.
you can't win with a bad quarterback
But what did they win? For ex: JPW didn't win anything, did he?
This post was edited on 10/13/09 at 6:39 am
1
Posted on 10/13/09 at 7:32 am to geauxtigers3
jay barker MNC, SEC
david greene SEC, Sugar
mauck BCS
flynn BCS
russell Sugar Bowl
leak BCS
doug johnson SEC
john parker wilson SEC west
david greene SEC, Sugar
mauck BCS
flynn BCS
russell Sugar Bowl
leak BCS
doug johnson SEC
john parker wilson SEC west
Posted on 10/13/09 at 7:32 am to RummelTiger
quote:
Tee Martin disagrees.
It is a different league than it was then.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 9:47 am to RummelTiger
quote:
Tee Martin disagrees.
The SEC is very different than when Tee Martin played. His coach found that out the hard way.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 10:32 am to seinfeldtiger
quote:I'd substitute maturity as a QB requirement to win in the SEC. That can come with time in the program (SR, sometimes a JR), experience at the position (SO who started as a FR), or very rarely it can be innate.
He made a comment that stuck with me for two days now..You cant win in this league without a great quarterback. I know a lot of people on here find him annoying, but i thought he was right on all night..Jefferson, is absolutely not ready for primetime...
Posted on 10/13/09 at 10:48 am to seinfeldtiger
That's BS. You can't win in this league without a great running game and defense.
Matt Mauck wasn't "great." Neither was Matt Flynn. They were efficient, smart and got the ball to people to make plays. Both teams had great defenses.
Matt Mauck wasn't "great." Neither was Matt Flynn. They were efficient, smart and got the ball to people to make plays. Both teams had great defenses.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 10:53 am to TigerBandAlumnus82
quote:
Yeah, I'd say that most LSU fans tend to like the guys that quarterbacked the Tigers to a National Championship over the ones that didn't. Imagine that.......
ok you're right. Flynn was better than Russell
What really makes me laugh are the people who don't know shite about football who say Russell didn't have it between the ears in college but Flynn did
Posted on 10/13/09 at 10:54 am to simmons2112
quote:
Both teams had great defenses.
2007 had a very "ok" defense during SEC play.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 11:08 am to Elleshoe
quote:
Flynn was better than Russell
He didn't say Flynn was better than Russell. He said people like those qb's who won championships, not that qb's who won championships were better.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 11:23 am to BhamTigah
Peyton could never beat UF, in 4 years. Not sure it's relevant but I like to throw that out there at every opportunity.
This post was edited on 10/13/09 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 10/13/09 at 12:00 pm to simmons2112
quote:Completely Agree!
Matt Mauck wasn't "great." Neither was Matt Flynn. They were efficient, smart and got the ball to people to make plays. Both teams had great defenses.
quote:
The starting QB should be the guy that has the most confidence and the one who has proven his ability to read the defense and get the ball into the hands of the play makers. We really don’t need a heisman grade QB, all we need is a smart confident QB that can get the ball to play makers with minimal mistakes.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 12:14 pm to seinfeldtiger
The key should be "an experienced quarterback". I want someone to name a NFL starting QB that won a National Championship in college.
The quarterback doesn't have to be great, but they need to be efficient and experienced. Bottom line. Junior-Senior quarterbacks win in college football.
The quarterback doesn't have to be great, but they need to be efficient and experienced. Bottom line. Junior-Senior quarterbacks win in college football.
Posted on 10/13/09 at 12:34 pm to LikeKnightsofOld
quote:
Danielson is the best in the business. And he's right about JJ. Jefferson is not as good as he was advertised.
Coaches led us to believe that he was a dynamic playmaker who just needed snaps. bullshite! He looks a minimum of another year away from being a legit playmaker, if at all. He hasn't gotten better, doesn't show leadership (or isn't being given the chance), and has been brainwashed to believe that all he has to do to win games and be a great qb is to not throw interceptions. AAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!
This post was edited on 10/13/09 at 12:36 pm
Page 4 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News